Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jemn v SPML


Jemn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5563 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just sent my LBA (letter before action) off to SPML asking for return of just over £400 in only arrears management fee and early repayment statement fee. At this stage I have not asked for interest, arrears councillor fee, repayment charge, or early repayment charge. The account is closed.

This was started in April with a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and followed up in late 2007 with the first letter asking for repayment, they replied with the usual their charges are fair; “We are sorry but as a result of our findings, we are not able to uphold your complaint against SPPL. We realise that this may not be the response you were seeking; should you remain dissatisfied with our response you have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service within 6 months of this letter.”

So I then took the complaint to the Financial Ombudsman who took some time to come to the decision that they could not help.

“I am sorry to disappoint you, but your complaint does not appear to be one we are able to deal with. Although Southern Pacific Personal Loans became covered by us on 6 April 2007 for certain lending matters, our power to deal with complaints only extends to complaints about regulated consumer credit agreements. A regulated agreement is one where the credit provided is no more than £25,000.

From the information available to me it appears your loan was for £*******, plus a £250 arrangement fee. As this is more than £25,000 the agreement is not regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. In addition, the credit agreement shows that it is an unregulated credit agreement. This means we are not able to consider your complaint about the charges applied to your account.

I realise that this is not the letter you were hoping to receive. I. should stress that it relates only to our powers to deal with the complaint -not the merits. I would also like to apologise for the delay in our informing you that we are unable to look at the complaint. Unfortunately, the relevant issues have only recently come to light. (My bold)

This letter does not affect any rights you may have to take other action against Southern Pacific Personal Loans, for example, through the courts. Therefore, you may wish to consider your legal options.”

 

I take it that the OFT are saying that they cannot help but they are advising me to sue. Will this help my case in court?

Edited by Jemn
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Have sent my LBA (letter before action) to SPPL and they are "unable to uphold my complaint......(the fees) have been applied in accordance with Tariff of charges and sundry fees booklet etc etc.."

So have now taken my N1 to the court, I think this will go the whole way. If anyone can give me some pointers; I assume I am still proceeding on the understanding that their fees are not fair?

I am still not sure about the FOS statement above "the relevant issues have only recently come to light." Is this something I should be concerned about?

Edited by Jemn
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I have two mortgage claims on the go at the moment the other is with the FOS they have been dealing with it since May 08, I have tried to contact them recently and keep getting an answer phone.

I think it's time to go it alone with that one as well.

Edited by Jemn
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi

SPPL's solicitors contacted me before we reached the court, I have accepted their offer and I received the money before Xmas (much needed)

It seems that SPPL do not want to go to court, so others should follow through with claims against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Jemn

 

Well done! Great result.

My complaint with the FOS is now being looked at. The wwoman that phoned me said they would be looking at whether they had treated me fairly. So we will have to see.

 

I have issues with SPML at the moment they have suddenly discovered 2 missed payments 1 form Sept 07 and 1 from Dec 06. Long battle ahead methinks!

 

Well done again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...