Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
    • who gave you the NTH? who was it sent to? thread title updated dx  
    • blimey CAG gave all that FREE help over +6mts and +100 posts and they never even bothered to comeback...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCCS and CCA


tracy1975
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5699 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have already posted this on another board on this forum, so sorry for the double posting but thought I'd try over here as it seems to be busier.

 

I am currently on a DMP with CCCS.

 

I have sent a request for copies of credit agreements to all my creditors. 3 have not replied within the time limit and 2 have replied stating that they don't have copies of the credit agreement.

 

I have just phoned CCCS and told them that none of the creditors have been able to produce an agreement and they have told me that since a new law was passed in 2006 not having a credit agreement does not make a debt unenforcable and creditors are still able to chase the debt!

 

All of my debts were acquired prior to 2006. I did point this out to CCCS but was told it makes no difference and that the changes in law mean that creditors are able to enforce debts without a signed credit agreement even if the debt existed prior to the law being passed. Can anyone please clarify on this?

 

Also my brother has said that he may soon be in position to be able to help with £1000 towards the debts. I was planning on offering this money as a full and final settlement between all my creditors. I have told CCCS about this and they have said I have no chance of clearing the total amount of the debts (£13433) with it. They have said the least I should offer is 30% and I would be better off spliting the total pro rata between the smaller debts. The smaller debts total £3068 and if I do this I will still be left with the largest debt of £10364.

 

Is it worth me offering them any less than the 30% and using their failure to supply me with a copy of the credit agreement as a bartering tool? If so does anyone have template letter for this which I could use please?

 

Thanks,

Tracy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have already posted this on another board on this forum, so sorry for the double posting but thought I'd try over here as it seems to be busier.

 

I am currently on a DMP with CCCS.

 

I have sent a request for copies of credit agreements to all my creditors. 3 have not replied within the time limit and 2 have replied stating that they don't have copies of the credit agreement.

 

I have just phoned CCCS and told them that none of the creditors have been able to produce an agreement and they have told me that since a new law was passed in 2006 not having a credit agreement does not make a debt unenforcable and creditors are still able to chase the debt!

 

The amendments to CCA made in 2006 are not retrospective so CCCS talking rubbish. For the two accounts that have admitted no agreement then a court cannot enforce the agreement. The creditor can still ask for payment but have no legal right to demand payment and you can tell them to bugger off. If the other three creditors have not supplied you with any agreement and the 12+2 working days have elapsed then you can stop payment, I would normally wait for the calendar month to elapse (though this has been removed in 2008 Consumer protection from unfair trading regs) Please remember that if any of the three creditors subsequently supply an enforceable agreement they can demand payment again.

 

All of my debts were acquired prior to 2006. I did point this out to CCCS but was told it makes no difference and that the changes in law mean that creditors are able to enforce debts without a signed credit agreement even if the debt existed prior to the law being passed. Can anyone please clarify on this?

 

As above rubbish

 

Also my brother has said that he may soon be in position to be able to help with £1000 towards the debts. I was planning on offering this money as a full and final settlement between all my creditors. I have told CCCS about this and they have said I have no chance of clearing the total amount of the debts (£13433) with it. They have said the least I should offer is 30% and I would be better off spliting the total pro rata between the smaller debts. The smaller debts total £3068 and if I do this I will still be left with the largest debt of £10364.

 

This is wrong you would be favouring one creditor above another that's a No NO for them to say that, it's the same as a creditor demanding precedence above all other creditors.

 

Is it worth me offering them any less than the 30% and using their failure to supply me with a copy of the credit agreement as a bartering tool? If so does anyone have template letter for this which I could use please?

 

My own view is if creditor has treated me with respect then I treat them the same. Interesting point out of 7 creditors I am only paying two debts.

 

Thanks,

Tracy.

 

All the best dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply dpick and for confirming what I was already thinking!

 

I'm unsure where to go from here. Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best course of action?

 

Thanks,

Tracy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have written a draft letter to send. I just wanted to check if it looks O.K to you wise folk before sending it to creditors.

 

Without Prejudice

Dear Sir/Madam,

Re: ************

I write concerning the balance outstanding on the above account.

I am unable to continue to make payments on this account because as you are aware my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default.

 

However, I can raise £*** and I offer this amount in Full and Final Settlement of the account.

This offer is made on the understanding that if accepted, neither you nor any associated company will take any further action to enforce or pursue this debt in any way whatsoever and that I will be released from any liability.

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

I also request that you mark any entry on any credit reference agency regarding this account as ‘satisfied in full’.

Payment can be made within 14 days of receiving your written agreement to this offer.

I look forward to your reply.

Yours faithfully,

*********

Enc: List of offers to creditors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a good idea Tracy, and a good letter.....

 

As for the 2006 regs Dpick is spot on along with your thoughts....

 

If you get the chance write to them saying that as your agreements are pre 2006 then it DOES still apply....

 

Then quote them this....

 

The Consumer Credit Act 2006 (Commencement No. 2 and Transitional Provisions and Savings) Order 2007 (No. 123 (C. 6))

 

Citation

1. This Order may be cited as the Consumer Credit Act 2006 (Commencement No.2 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2007.

Interpretation

2. In this Order the 2006 Act means the Consumer Credit Act 2006.

Commencement

3. (1) The provisions of the 2006 Act specified in Schedule 1 shall come into force on 31st January 2007.

(2) The provisions of the 2006 Act specified in Schedule 2 shall come into force on 6th April 2007.

Transitional Provisions

4. Subject to article 5, section 1 of the 2006 Act shall have no effect for the purposes of the 1974 Act, in relation to agreements made before 6th April 2007.

5. Section 1 of the 2006 Act shall have effect for the purposes of the definitions of debtor and hirer in section 189(1) of the 1974 Act wherever those expressions are used in

(a)

sections 77A, 78(4A), 86A, 86B, 86C, 86D, 86E, 86F, 129(1)(ba) 129A, 130A and 187A of the 1974 Act;

(b)

section 143(b) of the 1974 Act in respect of an application under section 129(1)(ba) of that Act; and

©

section 185(2) to (2C) of the 1974 Act insofar as it relates to a dispensing notice from a debtor authorising a creditor not to comply in the debtor's case with section 77A of that Act,

in relation to agreements made before 6 April 2007.

Ian McCartney

Minister for Trade, Investment and Foreign Affairs

Department of Trade and Industry

23rd January 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya tracey

 

your thread is what ive been searching for so just wanted to wish you luck and also have you pro rata offered the 1000.00 over all your debts then now,

as im in process of requesting all my cca some have come but cannot read, another said cannot supply, and another not responded after 15 days and a few am going to request today and post tomorrow

 

im thinking i could do a similar letter like yours but will have to wait until either 1 - i get a valid cca

2 - dont get a valid cca

3 - get nothing after the 12 working days

 

before i put a full and final letter to them?

 

just my thoughts at the moment, anyone assist pls

 

ta very much ciao maz

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maz,

 

Yes, I have offered the £1000 pro rata between them all. They have all either said they don't have CCA or simply failed to supply one within the time limit.

 

You can make a full and final settlement offer at any time but I decided to wait until they were in default of my CCA requests. I did this so that I could point this out to them in the letter and I am hoping that this will make them more likely to accept the offers.

 

I have also addressed the letters to my husbands creditors from me and vice versa (luckily none of the accounts are in joint names) as I was told by CCCS that if the offer letters are addressed from a friend or relative then they are more likely to be legally binding.

 

Have you claimed back any unlawful charges on the accounts?

 

Good luck.

Tracy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya Tracey

 

i have not claimed back any unlawful charges yet, im tackling mbna at the mo and they have sent me 2 illegible paperwork though i can see my signature , and the 3rd one i think i may have done via online and only they have sent terms and conditions info, and said sorry not been able to send a copy of the cca.

 

So not really sure where i stand on the charges reclaim only about 200.00 max on each card im guessing

 

good luck, ive subscribed to your thread to see how you get on ciao for now maz

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...