Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Clever people - bank sent barrister


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

Clever people to calculate.

 

PPI was 720

Additional Charges - not sure what for - 250

 

Total loan 11,900

 

Credit agreement for PPI - in their view they laid it out nicely and I only paid £15 - which in my opinion is not true

 

It is an front end loaded single premium policy - how do I work out the true cost though as the bank are not supplying me this.

 

Usual stuff was told it was part of the loan - I had to take it out.

 

 

They sent a city london barrister when amending my case to court to try and throw it out. The bank have now withdraw the document from their regular solicitors and decided to deal with it in-house with their legal department and have set out a four page defence, denying everything.

 

Any help with the charges would be appreciated and the misrepresentations act - what angle laidens the burden of proof on the defendant and to force them to show me the true costs. The denial is simply unbelievable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

Clever people to calculate.

 

PPI was 720

Additional Charges - not sure what for - 250

 

Total loan 11,900

 

Credit agreement for PPI - in their view they laid it out nicely and I only paid £15 - which in my opinion is not true

 

It is an front end loaded single premium policy - how do I work out the true cost though as the bank are not supplying me this.

 

Usual stuff was told it was part of the loan - I had to take it out.

 

 

They sent a city london barrister when amending my case to court to try and throw it out. The bank have now withdraw the document from their regular solicitors and decided to deal with it in-house with their legal department and have set out a four page defence, denying everything.

 

Any help with the charges would be appreciated and the misrepresentations act - what angle laidens the burden of proof on the defendant and to force them to show me the true costs. The denial is simply unbelievable

 

 

Hi there.

I would sent them a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request, there is a template on this site for this, you pay £10 say in Cheque payment, they have 40 days to comply to this, where they must send you EVERYTHING they have on you/Account, with a bit of luck the figures etc should also be provided in with this request.

 

I would give it a shot and see what comes back, this way you can also check any breakdowns and calculations and so.

 

We recommend you send this by recorded delivery - this can then be checked on the royal mail website - (Track and Trace), they cannot deny receiving your request.

 

If you require further info on this, shout back and someone will get back to you as soon as they can.;)

 

Di.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

I would sent them a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request, there is a template on this site for this, you pay £10 say in Cheque payment, they have 40 days to comply to this, where they must send you EVERYTHING they have on you/Account, with a bit of luck the figures etc should also be provided in with this request.

 

I would give it a shot and see what comes back, this way you can also check any breakdowns and calculations and so.

 

We recommend you send this by recorded delivery - this can then be checked on the royal mail website - (Track and Trace), they cannot deny receiving your request.

 

If you require further info on this, shout back and someone will get back to you as soon as they can.;)

 

Di.

 

I wouldn't send a cheque my love - never, ever give them a signature! Send a postal order instead - it's amazing what these SAR's turn up. :)

"Never annoy a redhead - especially when she's a member of CAG!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't send a cheque my love - never, ever give them a signature! Send a postal order instead - it's amazing what these S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'s turn up. :)

 

 

Hi there,:)

Yes I see your point lol, and I will take your tip on this one (postal order)...:D, the only reason why I always send a cheque is because I check my bank account daily so I know this payment has been debited.....:wink:, but yes I do see your point in this and will do the postal order on my next task.:)

 

I am in fact waiting for a SAR myself from e-loan, they only have until the 16th of this month to comply, but up to now although I know they have received the request by checking this out on the royal mail, they have not even attempted to debit the cheque payment out of my account yet.:???:.

I have early this week sent them a reminder, so with a bit of luck I should hear something soon, maybe they are sort of last minute sort of thing.

 

Yes a postal order seems to be another good option with no signature.;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like to send cheques because you know when it has been cashed. A tip I picked up is to slightly amend your signature (so that only you would notice) then you would know if you saw it again. An extra dot or dash usually does the trick for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...