Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st Credit and old HFC debt - Statutory Demand


Mr Bear 79
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5681 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Send by recorded

 

Dear sir/madam

 

Further to your recent letter dated XXXX I wish to inform you that I have applied to the courts to get the statutory demand set aside due various disputes including your non compliance with my request for a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement which your company signed for on. I will be attending the court hearing where I will be claiming all my costs.

 

yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/149110-1st-credit-stat-demand.html

 

Have a look at my thread. I am a couple of steps ahead of the Connaughts strategy you are currently entangled with. This should give you some clarity and peace of mind. Many items are covered, cross questioned and established in depth. You can guess what to expect almost.

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I haven't posted for a couple of weeks as there haven't really been any developments on this.

 

Since their letter of 12th August, I haven't received anything at all from Connaught. (no letters, no CCA).

 

I have had notification that my hearing to have the SD set aside will take place in the first week of October.

 

Three quick questions if I may.....

 

1) Connaught have not provided me with a CCA as yet and it is over 12 working days since they received my request. Is it a case of they have to respond within 12 working days, or they have to ensure that I have received it within 12 working days?

 

2) If they don't provide a CCA by the time of my hearing will it still go ahead?

 

3) The court have sent me only the most basic information about the hearing (just date and time). Is there anything they expect me to prepare or take with me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make sure you firmly dispute the debt....their non compliance is a full defence....(make sure you know as much as possible about the relevant acts)

 

If they haven't withdrawn the stat demand or given you notification then the hearing will go ahead....you must attend...

 

Take all the letters you have sent and the recorded delivery slips too....

 

Write down all your costs on a separate piece of paper, head it COSTS - LITIGANT IN PERSON and then work out how much time it has taken you for example...

 

10 hours to study the Consumer Credit Act and Case Law (£9.25 per hour is the most you can claim unless you are represented by a solicitor)....

 

Postage

 

Parking

 

I don't know what your personal circumstances are but you might like to mention this too which was quoted by a high court judge...your personal circumstances may not be the same....

 

As a lone parent with limited finances I approached a solicitor by phone and asked for an estimate on how much it would cost. I was given an estimate of 3 to 6 hours at £170 per hour to prepare the Application (£510-£1020) plus extra for attending the court.

 

I respectfully request that the court give consideration to awarding these costs on the indemnity basis or, in the alternative, on the standard basis as I believe, in any case, that they have been proportionately and reasonably incurred and/or are of a proportionate and reasonable amount.

 

In support of this request, I would also like to refer the court’s attention to the authority of the High Court in the case of:-

 

Hammonds (a firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd [2007] EWHC 1998 (Ch)

 

In this case, Mr Justice Warren confirmed that it was usual for an indemnity award to be made:-

 

27 So far as disputed debts are concerned, the practice of the court is not to allow the insolvency regime to be used as a method of debt collection where there is a bona fide and substantial dispute as to the debt. Save in exceptional cases, the court will dismiss a petition based on such a debt (usually with an indemnity costs order against the petitioner).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Connaughts are a bag of wind where bankrupcy is concerned. It costs them far too much money. Google your local trading standards address. They will soon put a stop to this abuse of process.

If my post helped you feel better, click my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Connaughts are a bag of wind where bankrupcy is concerned. It costs them far too much money. Google your local trading standards address. They will soon put a stop to this abuse of process.

 

I think that is perfectly summed up by the letter I have just received from Connaughts.

 

We write further to your application to set aside a Statutory Demand dated ******.

 

I confirm that we have written to the Court comfirming that we are willing to set aside the Statutory Demand, and would advise you that it is not our intention to attend the hearing of the ****** (date).

 

We would also confirm to you that our files have been closed and returned to 1st Credit......

 

We would request that all future correspondence in relation to this matter is forwarded to their offices.

 

It should also be noted that after over 30 working days they failed to provide a CCA.

 

In a way I'm quite disappointed at this, but at the same time relieved. It would have been a rather perverse pleasure seeing them go to the trouble and expense of making me bankrupt and then getting nothing out of it :D

 

I suppose I should still attend the Court as I have not had confirmation of this from them, but at least now I have no reason to be concerned when I do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that is perfectly summed up by the letter I have just received from Connaughts.

 

 

 

It should also be noted that after over 30 working days they failed to provide a CCA.

 

In a way I'm quite disappointed at this, but at the same time relieved. It would have been a rather perverse pleasure seeing them go to the trouble and expense of making me bankrupt and then getting nothing out of it :D

 

I suppose I should still attend the Court as I have not had confirmation of this from them, but at least now I have no reason to be concerned when I do.

 

 

I got exactly the same letter from Connaught regarding my SD, they also wrote to the court and said that both parties should bear their own costs! Suffice it to say the judge didnt agree with them and awarded me costs.

 

I rang the court and asked if I still had to attend, and the clerk told me that unless I wanted to withdraw the request for the hearing I should still attend, he added that if I withdrew the request for the hearing and the DCA didnt write to the court, they could petition for bankcruptcy for upto four months from the "served date".

 

I would definately attend the hearing and make sure that you request costs. The judges are getting really miffed with all these SD's being issued and then the DCA's not turning up! There has been five successes on this site this week (albeit with various DCA's).

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to 1st Credit and old HFC debt - Statutory Demand
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...