Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

marbles/hfc bank and moneytalk scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5738 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all! First off, in mess of debt! Worst problem is marbles c/c, with balance of £14.5k. Anyone who has this c/c will probably be aware that repayments went up by 1/2% in January, and they are now also putting up the interest rate again, this is crippling our finances to the tune of £360 per month -if we didn't have it, we could just about break even each month. I am now waiting to receive a phonecall from Moneytalk scotland and wondered if anyone knows anything about this company or have used them at all? Have been robbing peter to pay paul for so long, and now all credit applications are being refused ( tried to transfer balance of marbles onto a fixed payment loan) Basically a complete financial mess, and unsure of best way to deal with it all. Have no late payments on any of our finances, but push is coming to shove and I would appreciate it if anyone could tell me what would happen if we simply stopped paying the marcles c/c? Does it go to a debt collector? Thanks in advance for any help received .

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long have you had the card?

 

Are you paying the min each month?

 

 

idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

have had card maybe 7-8 years, and yes we are paying the minimum every month.We have transferred balances from it before, at various/numerous times since we've had it. Thankyou for your reply, if there is anything else please let me know:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Identical problem some years ago, which involved Marbles/HFC account. Because I kept refinancing to keep up minimum repayments, and also robbed Pete to pay Paul, I practically quadrupled my unsecured debt in a very short period. It all blew up in my face ,in the end I bit the bullet and started a Debt Management Plan with Consumer Credit Counselling Services. Wish I'd done it sooner, would have saved thousands in debt.

 

If you stop paying, Marbles will initially make a lot of noise down your phone chasing payment, this can be dealt with and you can ask for them to deal with you only in writing. There's template letters you can use to contact creditors explaining that you are having problems. I used CCCS as a free DMP, there is also Payplan and you can get free advice on the National Debt Line to do a DMP yourself.

 

HFC wouldn't stop interest or charges on the account until the DMP started with CCCS and they received budget details showing income and expenditure, other creditors etc from CCCS. But they did accept a reduced repayment amount once the plan was set up. Same with Barclaycard. Think only a couple of creditors stopped interest and charges before CCCS involvement.

 

Because I always paid the reduced DMP repayment , eventually HFC wrote and offered a 40% reduction on the overall balance, to be repaid interest free over 10 years. Not sure if small print would have shown they wanted new deal secured on the house. Didn't take their offer as it involved paying a very slight increase compared to what they got on the DMP.

 

They then asked if a voluntary charge would be allowed on the house and when that was refused they sold the account to a very aggressive DCA who's given a lot of harassment, and is threatening court action to gain a charge .Everyone else has been reasonable up till now. HFC from what I've read in other threads do seem to want to secure bad debt on property by way of charge orders. That doesn't mean that they always get them however.

 

No 2 people's circumstances are ever the same. Balance on HFC account mentioned was considerably less than yours, but combined debt figure was huge. IMHO and personal experience, I'd never recommend refinance to pay off unsecured debt, but other people argue it worked for them.

 

Is this the only unsecured debt you have? Are you a homeowner with equity in your house. Is your credit rating important to you or your job?

Edited by veryweary
info removed, didn't sound the way intended.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks so much for all your advice. Our total c/c's comes to about £45k (all unsecured) and we have an unsecured loan currently approx£12. There is no equity left in the house, as we used it earlier on this year to pay off 1st plus:mad: ( 20K debt, paid £10 into it over 5 years and had to repay balance of just over £20k, so annoying, but was secured debt and we didn't appreciate what we had done, when we did it, so to speak) We have both got to the stage where credit rating is no longer important, and must admit the Trust deed looks like a credible answer to our problems. If we did this, and it was all signed and sealed etc. at least we can say that 3 years down the line we can start again ( ps don't mean rack up any more debts!) I'd like to think we have learnt our lesson. Again, many thanks for your encouraging reply and hope all is good with you and yours:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our total debt was larger than yours:( Had a lot of different creditors so with being disorganised, it was easier to make 1 payment to CCCS to distribute. Due to all the recent price hikes our monthly repayment figure is considerably less than what we started the DMP with. But at least it's reducing at a rate we can afford.

 

Looked at Trust Deed, but didn't suit due to equity release requirement in year 3. Have read on threads here that they don't seem to suit most people, also some people are being misled into them .Also didn't want to pay heavy managment fees to company who oversee it. Been charged enough interest/fees on debt for the whole of Scotland, or it sometimes feels that way:eek:

 

Hope you get things sorted out

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...