Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Beneficial Finance PPI help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I need help reclaiming my PPI from Beneficial Finance

 

I took out a loan in 2000 and I believe the PPI was mis-sold to me and I have a good chance of reclaiming because

 

1) The sales staff did not once mention I was getting PPI as part of the loan package

2) You can’t claim if you work part time (which I do)

3) The option to take out the PPI is electronically ticked on the credit agreement

 

Now I have written to Beneficial twice about this each time asking for them to cancel the PPI and to give me a full refund each time they respond with the same letter saying they are looking into it and will get back to more shortly its now been 7 months since and still no response and I’ve even tried ringing them and sending more letters but had no luck there.

 

I tried the ombudsman route but they keep saying I need to give them more time to respond but it’s been 7+ months so I guess they are no help either

 

my only option is court action now

can anyone help me draft a final letter to beneficial to let them know I am planning court action?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello sem and welcome to the PPI forum,

 

PPI reclaiming relatively new all cases differ unlike the bank charges issue.

 

Hello I need help reclaiming my PPI from Beneficial Finance

 

I took out a loan in 2000 (The Financial Services Authority only started regulating PPI on 14 Jan 2005 and if Beneficial were not regulated by the FSA then you will probably have to take your case to court rather than the FOS) and I believe the PPI was mis-sold to me and I have a good chance of reclaiming because

 

1) The sales staff did not once mention I was getting PPI as part of the loan package. (This is fine if you have the documentation or transcripts of telephone conversations from them)

2) You can’t claim if you work part time (which I do) (I would say valid if you worked part time at the time you took out the loan)

3) The option to take out the PPI is electronically ticked on the credit agreement (Not sure here as a lot of claimants are using this as a way to reclaim and a lot depends on whether it was on their premises, by post, over the phone or internet etc)

Now I have written to Beneficial twice about this each time asking for them to cancel the PPI and to give me a full refund each time they respond with the same letter saying they are looking into it and will get back to more shortly its now been 7 months ( Have you sent a Subject Access Request?) since and still no response and I’ve even tried ringing them and sending more letters but had no luck there. ( I would suggest a strongly worded letter insisting on cancellation with immediate effect mention the dates of the earlier letters just as a case on reclaiming the premiums and interest later. Send the letter special delivery! the cost is up but you have a full track and trace with signatures of receipt so no denial on the letter getting to them)

 

I tried the ombudsman route but they keep saying I need to give them more time to respond but it’s been 7+ months so I guess they are no help either. ( I am going down the FOS route for starters and am not yet familiar with the Court route ---others on the PPI forum will be and if you have to go down that route you will get assistance from those with experience)

my only option is court action now

can anyone help me draft a final letter to beneficial to let them know I am planning court action?

 

Not sure I can answer all you points but here goes My comment will be bracketed to help as you read through.

 

 

Hope this helps keep posting

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tried the ombudsman route but they keep saying I need to give them more time to respond but it’s been 7+ months so I guess they are no help either.

 

The FOS are 8-9 months behind so 7 months is no surprise have they not written to you explaining the delay? have you had no communication from the FOS?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...