Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am hoping for some help. I noticed some readers state they have successfully challenged leaseholder charges. I am now being charged in excess of £2000 leasholder service charges on a garage in Kent. It is a simple garage. As it is a  non-residential the normal tribunal routes to appeal  the garage charges are unavailable. I requested an explanation of the charges. All the service company have provided is a list of charges nothing to say how these charges relate to my garage which has never been visited or maintained. I am charged management fees, account preparation fees, audit fees. The leaseholder forwarded my account to SLC solicitors three years ago. Three years ago I sent SLC a cheque to avoid legal action. SLC did not bank the cheque as they agreed that the charges are unreasonable. However the management company continued to issue charges on the garage. SLC have issued legal action again. I would love to hear from readers who have successfully challenged unreasonable leasehold service charges.
    • i can't find a lost scottish court claim for a speculative invoice... likewise i haven't seen any gauge of an increase in PPC's issuing court claims in scotland since the much trumpeted POFA changes in Scotland - if they even happened or changed anything   it pers concerns mea bit  more as you say you've read up....focussing on POFA.. that you still appear not to have understood the very 1st basic principle of PPC things ..they are not FINES.   if they did get sheriff officers to issue a claim, and again there is no data to indicate any increase at all in them doing so, bar a handful of cases you can count on one hand in the years before, there would be plenty of chances to fold .
    • Hi This is the email i sent in December.     Hi  I do apologise but I must say going by your list of varying case studies upon your website i think you are wrong. There are various examples there of let us say loans that have have recently completed, whereby resolutions have been found, they were not deemed out of time just because the policy was entered into at the start of the loan, some +10yrs earlier. What concerned me more was the DMP and thus the CMP & CML membership were only recently concluded.. The comment you have made that PayPlan sold me the two plans I've complained about in October 2007 is somewhat mute as policies were still live within the last 6yrs with regard to payments toward them , even within the last 3yrs , if fact. I would also like to mention. "letters in 2015 from Payplan should have alerted me there was an issue," is again pretty mute as I was not aware then I could complain of mis-selling, there is no evidence I can find before 2017 anywhere that CMP & CML were even reclaimable.! I would also like to point out there is a diff between CMP & CML, they state they are both membership schemes, they are NOT. I also believe the above further answers his exceptional circumstance question...there are none as I believe I don't need any as I am NOT out of time! For the reasons above I don't agree with your decision and would like to have this looked at by an ombudsman as stated in your previous email. Kind Regards.     I will post the attachment shortly.   
    • Ah I see, I did kind of give them a notice to pay up in 7 days before taking things further but they refused and instead asked for the next instalments through a solicitor letter. I was thinking whether it would be better and more cost saving if I instead take this to a small claims court as oppose to the big courts, I know that is what you suggested at the begining. I was just not sure if I had a case since I unfortunately signed the new variation agreement.   
    • Yes, I expect that the mutual agreement was based on "we'll give you this amount of money but part of the deal is that you agree not to talk about what happened during this mediation". I suppose that either party can insert any demands they want in the mediation process and it's up to the other party to accept it or to walk away and then to go on to court
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3719 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A call to all Swift Account holders for information:

 

Can you please tell us which bank account you pay your Swift payments into?

 

To protect the site we ONLY want the last 4 digits of the sort code and the last 4 digits of the account number

 

Which Bank:

 

sort code: xx 1234

 

Account : xxxxx1234

 

Please find out from your direct debit payments or your bank statements and post them here....tick tock....:D

 

Thanks

 

 

Yes you can pm Sparkie1723, pkelly or me but if you can just post it up here on the thread as nothing is confidential and pm boxes get filled.There's no point pm'ing sparkle72 with it as he already knows :p I need to know as many of these as I can from as many of you who can tell me too. Not everyone has these details as they pay by direct debit, but you can find out from your bank - they will tell you the recipient account. It is quite important -Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You're being very polite s/m/c have you had a good day or something?;)

 

I'm glad that Pkelly isn't on tonight maybe I can get to bed early

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites
You're being very polite s/m/c have you had a good or something?;)

 

I'm glad that Pkelly isn't on tonight maybe I can get to bed early

 

sparkie

 

...and we might get some sensible posts too...;)

Cabot and the Cabot Fan Club Threads:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/73598-dealing-cabot-101-cabot.html

 

Legal Actions Explained for Businesses:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20492-legal-actions-explained-company.html

 

Payplan CCCS Advice:

http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/getting-out-debt/128587-info-cccs-payplan-experiences.html?highlight=Payplan

 

How to use the Forum

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

A click on the scales below is appreciated if my posts were helpful

Do not regard my postings or suggestions as professional advice. If in doubt seek a professional opinion.

 

PLEASE DONATE IF SUCCESSFUL - Every little helps :)

 

PLEASE, Do not Private Message me with basic questions, start your own thread and PM a link if you wish, but I will not be able to respond to all individual questions as I am very busy on numerous other things and anyway, others cannot learn from PM's. It also stifles contributions from the vast talent base this site offers from it's contributors and I'm not all that clever really! :D Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

guess whos just flew in:D got myself one of these rasberry things so now I can logg on anywhere :D especially when my ears are warm lol

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

a) You're being very polite s/m/c have you had a good day or something?;)

 

b) I'm glad that Pkelly isn't on tonight maybe I can get to bed early

 

sparkie

 

a) I am always polite sparkie - so naff off!

 

b) He's back, so bang goes the beauty sleep :grin:

 

Sunray, thanks...keep them coming folks..

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant work this rasberry ting worse tahn mobile am in arport so be flying soon oh smc you are worse than a magnet at least it has a possive side lol

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a sensible post ...........I am on the track of the fact that Kestrel No1 are involved in mezzanine borrowing that in my understanding is the involvement of SPV's which in turn leads to securitization which Mr Webster has denied takes place in their group activities??? more investigating is continuing, using various means at our disposal..

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites
what med.... borrowng boss borrowing someones cough bottle:confused: has johnny da dose of the skitter

 

 

Don't know about cough bottle you must be on that wasssaammarrra or whats it called "marriedinhavana"

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Sparkie,

 

Mezzanine finance, is cheaper than equity financing and does not require the company to give up equity.

 

 

Can you enlarge upon that sunray...can you explain the difference and sparkie, where did you get that mezzanine word at this time of night?

 

Sorry, trying to be serious for once...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Sparkie,

 

Mezzanine finance, is cheaper than equity financing and does not require the company to give up equity.

 

 

Not on what I have just read on the debenture they undertook they handed over every thing from the time they signed the debenture ...but they hadnt got anything

Link to post
Share on other sites
Can you enlarge upon that sunray...can you explain the difference and sparkie, where did you get that mezzanine word at this time of night?

 

Sorry, trying to be serious for once...

 

 

Off the 395 Kestrel filed at Companies House 13th July 2004

Funder Bank Barclays ...security agent Indigo Capital ..... Presentor Solicitors DLA LLP

Noble Street London

 

This also has some strange wording on it ...Time critical application....seems as if this company was incorporated to borrow money in a bloody hurry..just my view

 

sparlie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie,

 

 

Its been a while since I covered this stuff, not one of my strong points,and as you know I don't have a lot of time at the moment to spend on it, but what was their debenture secured on then?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Sparkie,

 

 

Its been a while since I covered this stuff, not one of my strong points,and as you know I don't have a lot of time at the moment to spend on it, but what was their debenture secured on then?

 

 

That the question .they had only been in business 23 days what could they have as security?

 

 

I know even less than anyone but you can't get a mortgage if you haven't got a house UNLESS ???????? left to peoples imagination......that's how the yanks did it getting millions on a waste bit of land that belonged to the city councils

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3719 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...