Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   I assume this is a Gas Boiler and is so the first thing I would do is ask Your Repair for the Gas Safety Register Number of the 2 individuals they sent to your property to carry out that repair as they should be Gas Safety Registered.   Once you get that then check those numbers on the Gas Safety Register:   Find or check a Gas Safe registered business - Find or check a Gas Safe registered engineer in your area who can fit, fix and service your gas appliances. WWW.GASSAFEREGISTER.CO.UK Find or check a Gas Safe registered engineer in your area who can fit, fix and service your gas appliances.   What I would also do is send Your Repair a Subject Access Request (SAR) asking for 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase cover whatever format they hold your data in whether it be phone calls, emails, written etc. They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond and that time limit only starts once they acknowledge receipt of your SAR request
    • Hi . I also been motability customer for many years but this is my 1st diesel .  And I have to say motability staff are the cream of the cream  best of the best  100% amazing staff  but this time in particular when I said what happend  just like I said     The reply was  they must been a mistake I'll send them an email to remind them   Then I said I want to make a complaint about them as they was rude  dismissive and I dont really want to go back to them .  Then she said  this is a complaint  I'm doing it now and I'll send them an email to remind them  And I had nothing  off them since .  Also I left it on there feedback on there Webb site review.  (the dealer )  Which they replied in a bog standard click and paste reply  saying they  contact me and deal with  they never did  even left follow up feeback to the review.    I was shocked by the lack of response from motability  of the potential fraud  that could be going.on ..  As far as I'm concerned it is fraud  they know it's free to motability customers  but still try and charge  even argue with customers in middle of the show room  and that was there manager   david /dav .  
    • Hi   I myself am a Motability Customer and have been for some years with numerous cars.   What I will say is you won't have been palmed off by Motability as your complaint will be noted on their system with that specific dealership and they will have asked that dealership to respond to your complaint.   With Motability it will take more than one complaint against that specific dealership unless very serious for them to take corrective action on that specific dealership.   When you contacted Motability did you make it clear that you were complaining about that dealership and the adblue charge?   What exactly did Motability state to you after they had carried out their investigation? (Motability would have contacted that dealership for a response)   Did Motability offer to change you to another local dealership for servicing of your car? (they can do this if you are unhappy with that specific dealership)   I note you state your sister husband who is disabled took his car and was charged £30 for adblue for their car but could you clarify:   a) Was this at the same Dealership you went to?   b) Was this car a Motability Scheme Car?  
    • Thanks for the reply DX100uk   The lady said hard copy asap. I recall a previous letter with guidelines stating 14 days. i'll certainly submit an email version also as courtesy.   If its 7 or 2 days, then fantastic   but i also found this 'Accordingly, in the absence of a specific direction, witness evidence should be filed with the court at least 14 days before the final hearing date. statements. As per CPR 32.4(2), the court will order a party to serve witness statements on the other parties.'   https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/in-relation-to-witness-evidence-under-the-civil-procedure-rules-what-are-the-time-limits-for-filing-a   i have however found this: 1 Oct 2020 — 17.1 The witness statement should be headed with the title of the ... that the claimant must file the trial bundle not more than 7 days and ...   https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32/pd_part32#witness   but i cannot find that tect in the actual web page, i have found though: AGREED BUNDLES FOR HEARINGS 27.4 Rule 39.5 provides that the claimant must file the trial bundle not more than 7 days and not less than 3 days before the start of the trial.   so slightly confusing  
    • Nobby_v   Just to clarify for you yes you can post that link you have provide in your post.   Here is the full link: (Remember to got to 5.2.3. Tyres)   5. Axles, wheels, tyres and suspension - MOT inspection manual: cars and passenger vehicles - Guidance - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Inspection processes and rules for car, private bus and light commercial vehicle (class 3, 4, 5 and 7 vehicle) MOT tests.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4028 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Or did your banking exams not require you to actually count to nine in greek?

G

 

Okay nine for greek and I will spell it phonetically is en-a-ah. You want 1 to 8 and ten as well? LOL:)) I could teach you 1 to 10 in Japenses as well if you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay nine for greek and I will spell it phonetically is en-a-ah. You want 1 to 8 and ten as well? LOL:)) I could teach you 1 to 10 in Japenses as well if you want.

Thank you kindly BG I do need educating in the event that one day I may learn enough to become a banker.

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahhhhhhh!!!!!!!

There I was starting to believe and be drawn in to TIE.................he seemed to have me taken in.....then what happens.......he starts "slagging" Sparkie off again!!!!!!! Why surely he's...a banker !!!!! why should I have believed him....after all we should remember.....TCF..... Treating Caggers Fairly!!!!!

Jaws seems to see what is going on though ...they seem to see the light!!!.....every ioda......or is that IOTA???? perhaps my greek isn't as good as it used to be???????

 

Doc (as in Doctor)

 

 

TIE...please PM me I'd love to know which "Bank" you work for ....I'm just very surprised at the way you come across as a banker.....I'm intrigued.....or perhaps I'm just "gullible"!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to the facts, not the personalities, that way we get to the issues, not the differences of personalities. We all come from different backgrounds, professionally and otherwise, many of us had to learn from scratch, others may have the benefit of a job which has given a different and better insight. Collectively, we can come up with questions and answers. Acknowledge people's differences and beg to differ, just try not get personal, it achieves nothing and everyone is trying for the same result - the truth, the action we can take, the resolutions.

 

 

'Synergy' - the power of many added together to become a bigger force as one.

 

 

A1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest takeiteasy

That is the common sense way to approach this, focus on some misspelled words and nothing else. I agree, it did stand out amongst all of the grammatically correct sentences and the analytical and reflective writing spread out across this board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TIE You keeping schooling me into getting my facts right when you say things as this

"Also, it did not take the FSA 3 years to get GMAC and that was for TCF issues not the things you're on about."

I did not say the FSA because it was not the FSA I actually said the aithorities...it was actually the OFT and it was about extortionate penalty fees and charges...it was a short time after this big fine and the forcing of the pay back of over £7million in charges and fees that Swift Advances plc reduced some of their charges.

On another subject could JAWS 2010 be J ohn A lfred W ebster S wift.......no can't be I'm delusional again:rolleyes:

It's just a coincidence more than likely anyway its a good laugh ...to me anyway but I've got a scouse sense of humour

John Alfred

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest takeiteasy
Ahhhhhhh!!!!!!!

There I was starting to believe and be drawn in to TIE.................he seemed to have me taken in.....then what happens.......he starts "slagging" Sparkie off again!!!!!!! Why surely he's...a banker !!!!! why should I have believed him....after all we should remember.....TCF..... Treating Caggers Fairly!!!!!

Jaws seems to see what is going on though ...they seem to see the light!!!.....every ioda......or is that IOTA???? perhaps my greek isn't as good as it used to be???????

 

Doc (as in Doctor)

 

 

TIE...please PM me I'd love to know which "Bank" you work for ....I'm just very surprised at the way you come across as a banker.....I'm intrigued.....or perhaps I'm just "gullible"!!!!!

 

 

I will check my "banker" hand book to see how I should come across in a CAGER forum. But I will tell you now that there are some big meetings taking place in the the super special society of bankers in Dublin this week, and trust me, these guys don't mess around. There will be some big news coming out of there any day now. I have it from a reliable source. Dont be surprised if my spelling improves and I start using obscure bird references and underlining words and adjusting fonts to get my point across. Just you wait and see...I can say no more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will check my "banker" hand book to see how I should come across in a CAGER forum. But I will tell you now that there are some big meetings taking place in the the super special society of bankers in Dublin this week, and trust me, these guys don't mess around. There will be some big news coming out of there any day now. I have it from a reliable source. Dont be surprised if my spelling improves and I start using obscure bird references and underlining words and adjusting fonts to get my point across. Just you wait and see...I can say no more.

 

 

Oh Blooming hell this is getting scary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest takeiteasy
TIE You keeping schooling me into getting my facts right when you say things as this

"Also, it did not take the FSA 3 years to get GMAC and that was for TCF issues not the things you're on about."

I did not say the FSA because it was not the FSA I actually said the aithorities...it was actually the OFT and it was about extortionate penalty fees and charges...it was a short time after this big fine and the forcing of the pay back of over £7million in charges and fees that Swift Advances plc reduced some of their charges.

On another subject could JAWS 2010 be J ohn A lfred W ebster S wift.......no can't be I'm delusional again:rolleyes:

It's just a coincidence more than likely anyway its a good laugh ...to me anyway but I've got a scouse sense of humour

John Alfred

 

This looks a lot tlike the FSA to me Sparkie? And I stand by my belief that this is where you and the rest of the CAGERS have your best opportunity to be whole or partially whole. Whether through the FSA, OFT or another regulator.

 

FSA/PN/147/2009

29 October 2009

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has today announced it has fined GMAC‑RFC Limited (GMAC-RFC) £2.8million for failing to treat customers fairly and secured redress of up to £7.7million (plus interest) for over 46,000 mortgage customers.

Between 31 October 2004 and 30 November 2008, a number of serious failings by GMAC-RFC were identified in relation to its dealings with customers experiencing arrears and repossessions. These include:

  1. excessive and unfair charges for customers that did not reflect administration costs;
  2. proposing repayment plans that did not always consider a customer’s individual circumstances;
  3. inadequate training of mortgage servicing staff in handling of arrears and repossessions; and
  4. issuing repossession proceedings before fully considering all the alternatives.

The case sets a precedent, with the FSA concluding this investigation in a matter of weeks, and the firm working with the FSA to agree a process to enable customers to receive redress as quickly as possible.

As a result of early settlement, the firm qualified for a 30% discount under the FSA’s settlement discount scheme. Without the discount the fine would have been £4million.

Margaret Cole, director of Enforcement and Financial Crime, said:

“This case shows credible deterrence in action. It is an excellent example of what the FSA’s more intrusive approach can achieve for consumers, and it reflects what we said in our Mortgage Market Review last week about unfair mortgage arrears charges. Mortgage lenders and third party administrators should read this final notice and the Mortgage Market Review and take action in the interests of their customers.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question does the

 

Pre contract information: Disclosure of information by the creditor or lender

 

apply to unregulated agreements too?

 

hi

Sorry to but in just stumbled across this , no one seem to have answered yet so.

 

No the Pre contractural oblligations that are required by a regulated agreement si1481 do not apply to unregulated ones

 

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question does the

 

Pre contract information: Disclosure of information by the creditor or lender

 

apply to unregulated agreements too?

 

hi

Sorry to but in just stumbled across this , no one seem to have answered yet so.

 

No the Pre contractural oblligations that are required by a regulated agreement si1481 do not apply to unregulated ones

 

Peter

 

 

Thanks peter,

 

Well that is one mystery solved for me [where the smileys gone on this site?]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick question does the

 

Pre contract information: Disclosure of information by the creditor or lender

 

apply to unregulated agreements too?

 

hi

Sorry to but in just stumbled across this , no one seem to have answered yet so.

 

No the Pre contractural oblligations that are required by a regulated agreement si1481 do not apply to unregulated ones

 

Peter

 

 

I thank you too Peter:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my delusional thoughts again... but a laugh and a joke anyway........JAWS ...John Alfred Webster.SWIFT....no can't be!!?? That' just a coincidence most probably.

sparkie

 

 

:D:D:D:idea:

 

:cool::cool::razz:

 

You worked it out, Smart guy!!!!:oops::oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest takeiteasy

Gallahad - Once again fantastic logic. I misspelled a word, you signed up for a mortgage with Swift presumably without getting legal advice before you signed? That seems a far worse infraction. If proper spelling is what you seek you should find another board beacuse this one is riddled with typos and misspelled words. Doctors, bankers and even CAGERS do it all the time. The truth of the matter is most people don't care one ioda.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still await answer or a view as to how a company ...any company can state it lends money to the domestic market and state that .......it is regulated by certain Acts and Authorities hold these loans on their books....class them as asetts when it is clear and proven that these statements are completely and irrevocably false....no-one as yet has answered me. So I await.

By the way JAWS2010.....does the word "GROUP" hold any meaning to you ...if it doesn't it certainly will VERY shortly...it will come as a little bit of shock to you I think?

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gallahad - Once again fantastic logic. I misspelled a word, you signed up for a mortgage with Swift presumably without getting legal advice before you signed? That seems a far worse infraction. If proper spelling is what you seek you should find another board beacuse this one is riddled with typos and misspelled words. Doctors, bankers and even CAGERS do it all the time. The truth of the matter is most people don't care one ioda.

 

 

How many people sought legal advice before signing their loan/mortgage agreements? The majority of people place their trust and believe that this ground work which covers the legal side to of agreements will/would/should be covered by the brokers appointed to carry out this work.

 

It has only been a short while since the skeletons in the closet have started to come out and the consumer/borrower has found that what their trust has been not only fiddled about with by the broker and lender but also that they are up against many challenges to prove what they believe is right.

 

If we can get back to the subject of this thread and forget about the occasional spelling mistakes made then that will be great!

 

TIE, a question for you please if you don't mind?

 

Q. What help is available for people who have an unregulated secured loan and they are not happy with the terms and conditions that they signed?

 

I believe that my agreement contains many flaws and would like to know what to do about this please. I look forward to your response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest takeiteasy
I still await answer or a view as to how a company ...any company can state it lends money to the domestic market and state that .......it is regulated by certain Acts and Authorities hold these loans on their books....class them as asetts when it is clear and proven that these statements are completely and irrevocably false....no-one as yet has answered me. So I await.

By the way JAWS2010.....does the word "GROUP" hold any meaning to you ...if it doesn't it certainly will VERY shortly...it will come as a little bit of shock to you I think?

 

sparkie

 

How was it proven? If your claim has proven to be true, what's wrong with it? Who other than you, says it's wrong or illegal? What exactly are you saying is wrong or illegal? That may help to understand what you think they have dome wrong in this instance. Your question cannot be answered in the context you have written it. You need to provide more information because without it the question doesnt make sense. You state what they did - which is not illegal then say how can they do it when it's irrevocably false. Again, what are you claiming and what expert agrees with you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that there are certain individuals on the thread who are questioning Sparkies integrity.....Sparkie was involved in exposing the RBS [problem] below.

 

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5299156.ece

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well reading what Sparkie put on about the search just above they AINT ALLOWED TO DEBT COLLECT MONIES ?

Debt collecting Removed

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by patrickq1 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pointless telling a TROLLEY DOLLEY PAUL huh

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by patrickq1 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4028 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...