Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   I could be wrong here so could @namedisplay please clarify if I am correct or completely wrong?   In your post#1 you mention that due to your health issues and your mental state at the time you rang the Training Room and was told it would cost and initial £200 and then £15 per month until you finished the course.   Then further in post#1 The Training Room told you you were not eligible for an extension because you hadn't completed enough of the course.   With the above I now refer Post#12 which mentions your circumstances are covered by 13 in the TTR Terms and Conditions.   What is mentioned above seems conflicting from TTR for the following:   1. IMO that money of £200 and then £15 per month (on top of original Course Fees) was them at that time agreeing to an extension as per 13 in TTR Terms and Conditions   2. Them stating you can't extend Course as not completed enough of Course is not in TTR Terms and Conditions (that I and others can see) (Note they could be referring to 15 in TTR Terms and Conditions)   Can you clarify the above and were you informed those extra costs were due to an extension of your Course.   Again I will ask did you provide the Training Room with Medical Evidence when you asked the above?   We also still need to see the Letter from Training Room Threatening Legal Action (fully redacted) which you still haven't posted?   You need to send The Training Room a Subject Access Request (SAR) asking for 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase means whatever format they hold that data in whether it be written, email, recorded phone calls etc.   They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond to your SAR Request and that Time Limit only starts once they have acknowledged your SAR Request. They can extend that Time Limit if they need to prove identity before actioning the SAR Request so be aware of that.   A SAR Request is now FREE and make sure you get Free Proof of Posting from the Post Office     Your right of access ICO.ORG.UK   Can you please make sure you answer the questions asked of Caggers to assist you    
    • I've been trying to resolve a issue with 8 PCN issued by Tyne Tunnel 2 (tt2.co.uk). Tyne Tunnel 2 is a gated toll charged tunnel to cross the River Tyne in Newcastle. We moved in recently so all a bit new to us. My dad had been using the tunnel about twice a week and he had been paying cash for the toll fee at the booths. At some point in November 2021 they had done some constructions where the gates had been closed and payments had transitioned to online methods. My dad had been oblivious to this and been on his merry way multiple times thinking that he doesn't need to pay. So he received the first PCN some where end of November which had been issue on the 26th after which point I went on alert and sorted out the online accounts and such. However the current total of fines has amounted to £255.20 and I have appealed explaining that soon as the letters were received we have resolved the issue but they insist on us paying 8 PCN. I feel it's unfair that the fine is for the same offence which we couldn't have rectified or known until we received the first PCN letter and after the first PCN we have rectified it so feel they are being bit draconic. Any advice on this matter? 
    • No need to apologise! I am extremely grateful for both your help   Gosh very good attention to detail going on here   Great thank you, i will put them back as below   Good evening to you   DEFENCE   1.     The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.     2.     Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Lloyds TSB. I do not recall the precise details or agreement nor the claimant either, having failed to provide an agreement/account number within its particulars of claim and have therefore sought verification from the claimant.   3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement account number any breach has yet to be proven.      4.     I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served by either the Claimant or Lloyds TSB pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.   5. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any Notice of default served.   6.     It is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of the Agreement/Assignment/Default notice or Termination requested by CPR 31. 14.    Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and c) Show or evidence a Default Notice /Notice of Sums in Arrears, d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;   7.     As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.   8.     On the 5th of January 2022 I requested to The Claimants Solicitors, Mortimer Clarke by way of a CPR 31.14 copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. Mortimer Clarke have failed to fulfil my CPR 31:14 request.   9.     On the 5th of January 2022 I made a section 78 legal request to the claimant for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement. The claimant has as of 27/01/22 failed to comply.   10.  By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • std letter the court send simply telling you the claimant has 28 days to do 'something' else the claim get autostayed.   go read a goof few 10's of PCN claimform threads.    
    • Update. I get the feeling they will try and take me all the way. Just have to wait and see. court letter..pdf
  • Our picks

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just checked my most recent letter andit has the compliance officer as Adam WEst-Webbe all the other details are the same and that was at the 16th july:)

If you kick a Tiger in the Ass youbetter have a plan to deal with its teeth :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thanks everyone ....but again it appears that they are putting out more misleading info .......I have just had it confirmed by another of our members that the name is a Mr Stephen Trimmer , who we believe his full name is Mr Stephen Kenneth Trimmer......this in itself has given Swift Advances plc and Swift 1st Ltd a bit of a problem ....wil post the reason why when it becomes absolutely clear and accurate:D:D

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie and all

I think I mentioned before that I complained to the FOS and the OFT that letters from the Compliance Team had no identifiable signature or name on them. I believe none of them want to put their name to the rubbish they're putting out.

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie and all

I think I mentioned before that I complained to the FOS and the OFT that letters from the Compliance Team had no identifiable signature or name on them. I believe none of them want to put their name to the rubbish they're putting out.

x

 

You are on the right tract Sweet Jane keep checking and thinking;)

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkie and all

I think I mentioned before that I complained to the FOS and the OFT that letters from the Compliance Team had no identifiable signature or name on them. I believe none of them want to put their name to the rubbish they're putting out.

x

 

You are on the right track Sweetjane keep checking and keep thinking!!;):-) One of the compliance teams name is Mr Alan Loblack ...he has confirmed he is not a Comliance Officer

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

If It is a Mr Stephen Kenneth Trimmer who is now Compliance Officer at Swift ...it looks as if they recruited him from Enterprise Broker Services Ltd who are now in liquidation. That's a good omen isnt it ..I must say!!

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not anymore Fretful

 

 

Company Name:

ASSURED MONEY LIMITED

 

Company No: 05091727

Registered Office:

Incorporated: 02/04/2004

SOUTH LODGE NEW ROAD

LAMBOURNE END

ABRIDGE

ESSEX

RM4 1AJ

Company Type: Private Limited Company

 

Company Status: Dissolved

 

Accounts Type: TOTAL EXEMPTION FULL

 

Latest Accounts to: 30/06/2007

 

Latest Return to: 02/04/2009

 

 

Summary company details for ASSURED ADVANCES LIMITED

 

Registered no:03197412Registered office:South Lodge

New Road Lambourne End

Abridge

Essex RM4 1AJ

Incorporated:13 May 1996Status: LIVEPrevious names:01/05/2009ASSURED ADVANCES LIMITED/ASSURED ADVANCES LIMITED01/05/2009ASSURED MONEY LTD./ASSURED ADVANCES LIMITED08/11/2007BLUETULIP SOLUTIONS LTD/ASSURED MONEY LTD.24/01/2007BISHOPS HALL LIMITED/BLUETULIP SOLUTIONS LTD29/04/2005MALVERN HOMELOANS LTD/BISHOPS HALL LIMITED18/06/1996SPENDINE LIMITED/MALVERN HOMELOANS LTD

Edited by lesterlass
added more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

stubbled accross this thread by accident but was interested, Swift was advertising this position earlier this month see job description.

 

Mortgage Compliance Officer

 

 

Location Brentwood, Essex

Salary £35,000 - £40,000 per annum

Sector Financial Services - Compliance

Job Type Permanent

Date 07 Jul

Applications 43

Duration Full Time

 

To provide technical guidance, support and feedback on regulatory issues to both the business and the Compliance Manager. Ensuring that new business proposals as well as existing processes, systems and controls comply with regulatory obligations.

General knowledge and understanding of relevant legislation, regulations, policies and codes governing the mortgage industry, (particularly lending)essential.

Must have

• Excellent written communication skills

• Ability to work under pressure

• Ability to work independently or as part of a team

• Enthusiastic and understanding personality

• Commercial acumen – able to balance regulatory risks with the needs of the business

• Dealing with introducing brokers and packagers

• A flexible and “common sense” approach with an ability to build and successfully maintain relationships across the organisation, together with a “can do” attitude to overcoming potential challenges

• Influencing skills

 

The post holder will ideally have 3 years experience gained within the mortgage/financial services industry.

 

not a lot of help but thought it might give you a laugh.

 

Can do attitude

Work under pressure

common sense approach

 

hhhhmmmmmmm

having said that not short of applicants were they

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's just switched the company numbers for Assured Advances and Assured Money although it's showing as being a dormant company anyway:-

 

Name & Registered Office:

ASSURED ADVANCES LIMITED

SOUTH LODGE

NEW ROAD LAMBOURNE END

ABRIDGE

ESSEX

RM4 1AJ

Company No. 03197412

 

 

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifStatus: Active

Date of Incorporation: 13/05/1996

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC(03)):

7499 - Non-trading company

Accounting Reference Date: 31/05

Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/05/2010 (DORMANT)

Next Accounts Due: 29/02/2012

Last Return Made Up To: 13/05/2010

Next Return Due: 10/06/2011

Last Members List: 13/05/2010

Previous Names:Date of changePrevious Name01/05/2009ASSURED MONEY LTD.08/11/2007BLUETULIP SOLUTIONS LTD29/04/2005MALVERN HOMELOANS LTD24/01/2007BISHOPS HALL LIMITED18/06/1996SPENDINE LIMITEDHe might also be involved with this active company:-

 

BISHOPS FINANCE LTD

c/o C/O CHRIS DIXON

KENNETH ELLIOTT & ROWE

18 EASTERN ROAD

ROMFORD

ESSEX

UNITED KINGDOM

RM1 3PJ

Company No. 03197322

 

 

spacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifspacer.gifStatus: Active

Date of Incorporation: 13/05/1996

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC(03)):

7499 - Non-trading company

Accounting Reference Date: 31/05

Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/05/2010 (DORMANT)

Next Accounts Due: 29/02/2012

Last Return Made Up To: 13/05/2010

Next Return Due: 10/06/2011

Last Members List: 13/05/2010

Previous Names:Date of changePrevious Name31/10/2005MENDIP HOMELOANS LTD18/06/1996CLAMINE LIMITED24/01/2007ASSURED BRIDGING CORPORATION LTD.06/05/2010BLUETULIP ADVANCES LTD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to thank all the people that are sending me their copies of letters from Eastern Counselling Department along with the documentation they received with these letters....they are brilliant...... thank you again I have a special plan with regard to these....of course I may get a special comment about "my plan" from Take it easy ...we will have to see;):)

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest takeiteasy
I want to thank all the people that are sending me their copies of letters from Eastern Counselling Department along with the documentation they received with these letters....they are brilliant...... thank you again I have a special plan with regard to these....of course I may get a special comment about "my plan" from Take it easy ...we will have to see;):)

 

sparkie

 

Sparkie - only because you invited me. Of course I have been following your recent posts and am delighted to see you're still delusional as ever. The "special plan" hmmmmm...will it be similar to your Belfast connection when Swift was going to lose its license? That one went down like a ton of bricks. Or is it more inside information from your secret connections? I'm happy your back to good health and that you haven't lost your gift of fantasy. Clearly your doctors exams stopped before they reached your brain. You do however seem to have a new group of followers to whom you are a true inspiration. My offer from months ago still stands, I will pay your mortgage if your babble is ever proven to be true. As before, I wish you'd account for the many things you said were going to happen that never did. You seem to be on several boards spewing the same nonsense with nothing ever happening. You continue to create false hope to so many people and you should be ashamed of yourself. You are as fraudulent as Swift are unethical (not illegal).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie - only because you invited me. Of course I have been following your recent posts and am delighted to see you're still delusional as ever. The "special plan" hmmmmm...will it be similar to your Belfast connection when Swift was going to lose its license? That one went down like a ton of bricks. Or is it more inside information from your secret connections? I'm happy your back to good health and that you haven't lost your gift of fantasy. Clearly your doctors exams stopped before they reached your brain. You do however seem to have a new group of followers to whom you are a true inspiration. My offer from months ago still stands, I will pay your mortgage if your babble is ever proven to be true. As before, I wish you'd account for the many things you said were going to happen that never did. You seem to be on several boards spewing the same nonsense with nothing ever happening. You continue to create false hope to so many people and you should be ashamed of yourself. You are as fraudulent as Swift are unethical (not illegal).

 

Hi takeiteasy:)

 

Are you back in the UK on another business trip?

 

Did you manage to resolve the issues surrounding your Mother and her Alzheimer's that I understand first brought you to this forum?

 

So nice to see you have time to drop by to offer your opinion once again............shame it has to be at the expense of someone more valuable to the rest of us than you are ever likely to be.

 

Unless you can offer something of any substance to this thread I suggest you make better use of your time here in the UK.

 

Landy x

  • Haha 1

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said Landy

 

Strange how TIE has only ever posted on one thread THIS ONE

 

Why do SWIFT fascinate him/ her ?????????

 

LL X

 

Exactly LL - you would have thought he/she would have better things to do with their time, particularly considering that they originally supposedly came here in search of answers to their own problems (not Swift related) :confused:

 

Landy x

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he were any more transparent he would have to be a window

G

 

:lol::lol::lol:

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie - only because you invited me. Of course I have been following your recent posts and am delighted to see you're still delusional as ever. The "special plan" hmmmmm...will it be similar to your Belfast connection when Swift was going to lose its license? That one went down like a ton of bricks. Or is it more inside information from your secret connections? I'm happy your back to good health and that you haven't lost your gift of fantasy. Clearly your doctors exams stopped before they reached your brain. You do however seem to have a new group of followers to whom you are a true inspiration. My offer from months ago still stands, I will pay your mortgage if your babble is ever proven to be true. As before, I wish you'd account for the many things you said were going to happen that never did. You seem to be on several boards spewing the same nonsense with nothing ever happening. You continue to create false hope to so many people and you should be ashamed of yourself. You are as fraudulent as Swift are unethical (not illegal).

 

 

Would you pay my mortgage Take It Easy if I proved any of this were true? ;)

 

SC

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Take it easy

 

Would you pay my mortgage also?

 

How are you finding life now,... between jobs?;)

 

Taking it easy I presume??:smile:

 

Propaganda

 

For example, you may find yourself reading a study which claims that the affects of oil spills on marine life are greatly exaggerated. Given the large amount of information to the contrary, you may want to see who is putting that information forward. It is highly probable in this example that the information is being provided by big oil, often through a front group which appears innocuous. By following the money, you may determine the true source of the information, which might have an impact on how you think about it.

 

If we followed Take it Easy where do you think that would lead us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Take it easy

 

Would you pay my mortgage also?

 

How are you finding life now,... between jobs?;)

 

Taking it easy I presume??:smile:

 

Propaganda

 

For example, you may find yourself reading a study which claims that the affects of oil spills on marine life are greatly exaggerated. Given the large amount of information to the contrary, you may want to see who is putting that information forward. It is highly probable in this example that the information is being provided by big oil, often through a front group which appears innocuous. By following the money, you may determine the true source of the information, which might have an impact on how you think about it.

 

If we followed Take it Easy where do you think that would lead us?

 

Guys,

 

Why all the subterfuge?

 

If anyone knows who TIE is, lets name him and get him out of the closet?

 

If he is connected with Swift and exposure might get him in trouble - so what?

 

At least give him/her a chance to confrim or deny?

 

Why all the fannying about?

 

m

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...