Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I'be been browsing this forum for a few days and hopefully one of you could answer a question for me.

 

I was evicted by Swift earlier this year. While i cant really argue with the eviction itself because we were in serious arrears, i can certainly argue with the cost of it. I wont bother going into detail about this, (Unless anyone is interested in the fine detail) but i'm now trying to get my head round the charges and there seems to be many irregularities. I sent a SAR and the reply i got was a joke, there was no detail at all. I'm now writing a very long list of exactly what information i want from them.

 

I'm looking at the list of transactions they sent through and obviously (because this is Swift) there are lines and lines of extortionate charges. Which brings me to my question, at the end of each line there is a "Total Owed Balance" Would i be right in thinking that if line 23 ends with a Total Owed Balance of £10,000 and line 24 is an arrears charge of £23, the Total Owed Balance at the end of line 24 should be £10,023? I ask because the balances seem to jump about £180 when the charge is only £23. I suspect it is right and i'm missing something but any advice would be gratefully received.

 

Regards

 

Shoops

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

They may have made a mistake or they may have added a monthly 'management' fee....Was there any PPI on the agreement (did you use it) ? When did you take this out ? Did you know about the 'undisclosed' commission that Swift paid to the broker ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 42man. There was no PPI and there are several "Management Charges" of £70 on the list so they seem to have been charged in their own right. I took the mortgage out in 2007. I've added a question to my subject access request about the commission that Swift may have paid to the broker without my knowledge. I paid the broker £2000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks SC I thought so,

 

I have the paperwork from the court stating Swift Group Legal Services were taking over that was dated 1st FEB 2008 signed by MAthew Payne.

 

J W Godfrey was not employed by SGLS was he. I was hoping it was formed before that date.

 

LL

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's music to my ears Doc!!! We're at a critical time this week so any bad news for Swift is hopefully good for us. Shoops - have you got a copy of Swift's tariff? There is one on their website now. If you were in arrears you might have had a monthly management charge but there shouldn't be other charges that month especially if you were in contact with them or it was being handled by their legal department. Did they write advising you of the additional charges as they were about to be applied - this is supposed to give you a chance to pay those charges instead of having interest added to them. Swift are not very good at doing that - well they certainly weren't in the past. Ask them for clarification on charges and if you don't get a satisfactory answer go to the FOS. They have prooved very helpful to me at getting charges refunded - not on all other charges but certainly on that one. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, thanks for the responses.

 

I'm looking at the notice of eviction and it just says Swift 1st Ltd. There was one previous hearing to evict me which i avoided with a payment but as far as this one goes the court notice of eviction is dated 25th March and the eviction took place on April 26th. We tried to avoid the eviction with a last minute appeal at court on the morning of the eviction but it failed. Their solicitor didn't even turn up. They sent a fax saying they would only agree to putting the eviction off if we paid the arrears in full. They even charged us £245 for "
Solicitors charge to attend court hearing.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoops

It should say on the documents somewhere who the solicitors were. They often use a local solicitor for the actual hearing but all the paperwork beforehand will be done usually by there in house solicitors, Swift Group Legal Services, if they have used them they are committing an offence.

I have reported them to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

 

LL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

shoops.....It's worth e-mailing the details of your experience with Swift to David Blocksidge at the Office of Fair Trading. He has a file on Swift that is growing all the time, and the more complaints he gets regarding the way Swift operate and apply outrageous charges without your knowledge the better.

 

The e-mail address for David Blocksidge is [email protected]

 

Apollo18

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smarterchick, the only advice i sought was CAB and they basically told us we didnt have a chance because of the arrears. The only time ive written to Swift was the SAR. I had a letter from Swift Group Legal Services12 days before the eviction saying they have obtained a date to evict me and then set out details of the arrears and how i would have 14 days to remove my possessions from the house.

 

Shoops

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Apollo18

 

Someone else suggested writing to David Blocksidge and Edward Allie. I emailed them and got this reply back....

 

I write to acknowledge receipt of your email and complaint about Swift Advances plc. Having read the email, I have reached the conclusion that the loan in question is first charge. Regulation of first charge mortgages, as you may be aware, falls to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and complaints relating to them must be addressed to that authority.

Please find below information for dealing with the Contacts Centre at the FSA, to which you may wish to address your complaint.

Thanks Apollo18

Shoops

Link to post
Share on other sites

Swift 1st Ltd and Swift Advances plc do not have their own in house solicitors capable of acting in legal proceedings and in any event they are now the so called in hose solicitors of SWIFT SECURITIES LTD.

 

THey have been added to the renewal application of the CCA licence of Swift Advances plc as trading style ...but they cannot use it until the full licence has been granted. It has also been confirmed by the OFT that they cannot be on two different companies licence.

LL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shoops,

 

In other words Swift Group Legal Services. Bet they did not put a name the letter, maybe a squiggle for a signature. get all you have and report them to the SRA [email protected]

 

LL

 

 

Do that but....come back here first and lets chip away, word by word, detail by detail, squiggle by squiggle exactly what happened, then we can tell you what needs to be done, what advice to get and how to go about it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smarterchick

 

The Swift Group Legal Services letter says they have obtained a date to evict us. I will have 14 days to remove my possessions. It details the arrears on the accountwhich "Must be paid in full before (date of eviction) unless an arrangement has been made since we issued the warrant. If the arrears are not made or a satisfactory arrangement made, the court bailiff will take possession of your home on (date and time of eviction)" It goes on to say how i can make a payment and that i will be responsible for any shortfall if the sale doesn't cover the debt.

 

Shoops

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...