Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Swift Advances. Secured Loan Charges reclaim


overdone
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi All,

 

I have been following this with interest and may soon have to join in the swift-bashing but dealing with other gremlins at the moment. This would be entertaining were it not really about how these g***balls are ruining people's lives.

 

Sparkie - goodluck on the morrow!! Go get them!!!

 

atom

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would not credit it I have justgone over Mathew Paynes statement of truth. He's a solicitor ....he has made 2 false misleading statements in it...........

1...He has stated that the interest rate shown on our agreement is a " nominal rate of interest"

 

Mark White said under oath that it is an actual APR shown on our agreement to assist the borrowers ( US) to know exactly what interest we were paying.

 

2. Mathew Payne says that the interest is calculated @ 0.82% monthly and is shown as such on our agreement

 

Take a look at our agreement on post 12 ........you will see that there is no mention of a monthly interest rate of 0.82%.

 

Can anyone see this on that agreement??

 

sparkie

 

The mans a teller of untruths.

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

I will find out tomorrow if my interpretation is correct ........IF it is Daz .you have hit the Jack pot because your First Mortgae will be null an void as well .EVERYONE keep your fingers crossed for Daz as well now.

 

Doesn't say what the charge is for.

 

 

 

(02.08.2004) REGISTERED CHARGE dated 15 July 2004.

Page 4 of 6

C: Charges Register continued

7 (02.08.2004) Proprietor: MORTGAGES 7 LIMITED (Co. Regn. No.

4688080) of 3rd Floor, 28-30 Cornhill, London EC3V 3NF.

NO monies mentioned

 

 

8 (27.06.2006) REGISTERED CHARGE dated 26 June 2006.

 

9 (27.06.2006) Proprietor: SWIFT ADVANCES PLC (Co. Regn. No.

1800474) of Arcadia House, Warley Hill Business Park, The Drive,

Great Warley, Brentwood, Essex CM13 3BE.

 

No monies mentioned

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.landregistry.gov.uk/www/wps/QDMPS-Portlet/resources/example_register.pdf

 

check this link sparkie. Its a copy of a propley done land registry deed.

 

 

Dazpen ...You little beauty ;) It looks as if I am right .....The Swift entry is incorrect:cool: Cannot be relied on...........ABSOLUTE COCK UP BY SWIFT

 

 

sparkie

NOTE: Copy in Certificate.

4. REGISTERED CHARGE dated 3 December 2001 to secure the moneys including the further advances therein mentioned.

PROPRIETOR Ilkingham Building Society of 101 Cambridge Street, Ilkingham IL1 3FC.

The charges register contains identifying particulars of registered mortgages and notice of other financial burdens secured on the property (but does not disclose details of the amounts of money involved). It also gives notice of other rights and interests to which the property is subject such as leases, rights of way or covenants restricting the use of the property.

A registered mortgage, called a charge, affecting the title. It gives the date of the charge and the name and address of the lender.

Where the matters contained in a deed are lengthy, we normally do not set out the full details in the register. This is because it allows us to process applications quicker so providing a more efficient service to our customers and also because the matters are sometimes best understood when read with the rest of the deed. Where this method has been used, the deed will be referred to in the register as "copy in certificate" or "copy filed". To obtain an official copy of a deed referred to on the register in this way you will need to complete form OC2.

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges register contains identifying particulars of registered mortgages and notice of other financial burdens secured on the property (but does not disclose details of the amounts of money involved). It also gives notice of other rights and interests to which the property is subject such as leases, rights of way or covenants restricting the use of the property.

This is the charges register, my registry doesn't contain any figures whatsoever, but would the official register not contain it?

Lets not get excited yet folks...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask a stupid question here guys and girls, but I presume its only possible to check the land registry for charges on the property you actually live in/or that are still current?

 

In other words, I couldn't discover what was registered historically on my previous property now that I've moved and am no longer with Swift?

 

Anyway off to bed now - as Sparkie should be too, to get his beauty sleep for tomorrow:D

 

G'night folks!

LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Charges - Refunded inc 8%

 

MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

 

MBNA 2 Accident Ins - Refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges -Partially refunded

 

Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - Refunded inc CI & 8%

 

Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

 

Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

 

M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

 

Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

 

Swift Mortgage Charges -Refunded

 

Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges register contains identifying particulars of registered mortgages and notice of other financial burdens secured on the property (but does not disclose details of the amounts of money involved). It also gives notice of other rights and interests to which the property is subject such as leases, rights of way or covenants restricting the use of the property.

 

This is the charges register, my registry doesn't contain any figures whatsoever, but would the official register not contain it?

 

Lets not get excited yet folks...

 

 

S/M/C You are not paying attention in class the copy Swift have submitted to the Court in my case is a TRUE copy of the Title Charge registerd...It is stated clear as such in our Markys witness statement of TRUTH?????

 

 

And this is what Swift are relying on in Court tomorrow

 

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to ask a stupid question here guys and girls, but I presume its only possible to check the land registry for charges on the property you actually live in/or that are still current?

 

In other words, I couldn't discover what was registered historically on my previous property now that I've moved and am no longer with Swift?

 

Anyway off to bed now - as Sparkie should be too, to get his beauty sleep for tomorrow:D

 

G'night folks!

 

 

HI landy ...CHeck in your old Court Bundle

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

S/M/C You are not paying attention in class the copy Swift have submitted to the Court in my case is a TRUE copy of the Title Charge registerd...It is stated clear as such in our Markys witness statement of TRUTH?????

 

 

And this is what Swift are relying on in Court tomorrow

 

 

sparkie

 

 

 

That's me told !:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just some early morning information gathering to confront Swift with

 

sparkie

 

 

FORM OF CHARGE

 

 

Provided that it complies with the Land Registry’s general requirements for a charge, the parties are free to use their own form of charge document. As a (safer) alternative, especially where both the borrower and the lender are private individuals, the parties should use the Land Registry’s form CH1 - to download a copy of form CH1 [as a PDF], please click

HERE

 

 

Whichever type of charge document is used, it must actually state that the borrower charges the property by way of legal mortgage as security for the payment of the borrowed monies and to secure all the borrower's other obligations to the lender-[ as an example, please see Panel 6 in the Land Registry form CH1].

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...