Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hsbc credit card


lack of cash
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya loc and welcome to the HSBC forum :)

 

Credit card claims are much the same as any other claim, if you have been charged for late payments of exceeding your credit limit you can claim it back :)

 

Have a read of the Frequently asked questions section at the head of the forum to find out about reclaiming penalty charges.

 

To find out if your credit agreement is enforceable you need to send the bank a Consumer Credit Act section 78 request letter, they are bound by law to send you a true copy of the agreement.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ya i have sent them a cca it took the fith time for them to send it me only the fourth time they acknoledge it saying it was not my signature sent it again on the fith time sending me a letter saying they could not find credit agreement in the mean time d&g solicitors took it court and got judgement and have now got a interim charge on my house have received from d&g sols my credit agreement and i would like to know if it is enforcable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Loc, here's a couple of threads that should answer your questions :)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/105315-my-agreement-enforceable-useful.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/131982-basic-information-credit-agreement.html

 

just shout if you have any other questions and just to give you a bit of piece of mind judgments can be set aside if you can find fault with the basis the judgment was made on... so here's hoping you can find fault with your agreement :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks but i cant find none of that stuff on my agrement its just got credit agreement my name and adrress then personal data then my signature . think i must be a bit thick but dont understand any of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i first had the card i was a single parent in a council house on income support . now my kids are at school and i dont have to leave them with a childminder i felt comfy going to work and bought my house now hsbc seem to want some of that and i feel that if i wanted a secure debt then i would av gone for a lone as it would have been cheaper. still dont understand how they can put a charge on my house please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks but i cant find none of that stuff on my agreement its just got credit agreement my name and address then personal data then my signature . think i must be a bit thick but don't understand any of this.

 

Hiya Loc, don't worry its confusing to start with :) what have DG sent you?

 

Is it your original application form for the credit card that you signed to get the card?

 

Does the form they have sent you have any terms and conditions on it?

 

let us know a bit more information and we can advise you what to do :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Loc :)

 

Although this is headed Credit Card Agreement it looks more like an application form to me but it is still very fuzzy :rolleyes:.

 

Do any of the terms and conditions have the following?:

  • Anything stating how you are to make the repayments under the agreement?
  • Anything stating the rate of interest to be applied to the credit issued under the agreement
  • Anything stating your credit limit?

If it doesn't contain all three its not enforceable.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then the debt is unenforceable and your CCJ should be set aside let alone the charging orders. have a read of this thread

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 12 How To Set Aside A Judgment In The County Court

 

then come back and ask us about the bits you don't understand :)

 

by the way how are you at talking in a formal situation? can you put your side of the argument clearly to a judge or would you get flustered? :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

have been on national debtline dont understand most of it :confused: and as far as i know i have no ccj just the interim charge on my house and i am not at all good in front of a judge :o

 

There MUST be a CCJ if there is an interim charge. I assume it is a default judgment which means that it was never contested. You may be able to set it aside if you have a reasonable ground which the unenforceability argument could well be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Sequenci, thats what I thought but wasn't sure, I owe you a pint :).

 

loc, you have six days to put together a document which proves your Credit Card Agreement does not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act and is therefore unenforceable and on those grounds you must request the banks application for a charging order is refused and the CCJ you have against you is set aside.

 

All of the information you need is in the national debt line page I posted earlier but if you feel you are unable to do this yourself I think you should make an urgent appointment to see your local Citizens Advice Bureau, the sooner you can do this the better and defiantly before your court appearance on Friday.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

well went court today and i must say i think the judge must hav shares in hsbc as i walked in the room she said i was lucky to as i was late ( i was infact there 40 mins be for the time)what a waste of time she had no interest in anything i had to say d&g solicitor was in the room already and the judge said we have not been discussing your case think she made her mind up before i went in as she put the charge on my house anyway and told me to try to have it set aside but dont stand much of a chance as i borrowed the money so i have to pay it back felt like i was in the head teachers room .... so how do i try and hav this set aside and and would i be able to ask for a different judge as she said iv done 50 or 60 charging orders today her words to me were did u borrow money i said yes she said then u hav to pay it back dont think they will make u sell yur house for £4000 making the order u can go that was the jist of it WHAT A BIT*H dont no if i can swear any one with a bit of help please what should i do now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done loc :) it takes some nerve to walk into a situation like that and it sounds like you tried to get your points across, unfortunately there is nothing you can do if your judge is not interested in what you are saying :cool:.

 

I think you should phone the National Debt Line (the number is on the link below) and go and discuss your situation with them :). They employ legally trained advisor's who will give you advice for free and will be able to look at your case and the documents you have received and give you honest and unbiased advice :).

 

National Debtline England & Wales, for FREE CONFIDENTIAL and INDEPENDENT ADVICE call 0808 808 4000

 

Good luck and keep us posted

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

What an absolute FARCE

 

but i must say,im not surprised that the judge took that stance and i am guessing that you didnt put forward any case law to support your reasons as to why the law says you should not pay back the money etc,

 

many judges cannot get their heads around the fact that an unenforceable credit agreement means no repayments

 

you would now need to look at getting the judgment set aside, you would need a good reason and would need to make a strong application supporting it

 

 

was todays case a application to set aside the previous judgment? or was it their application for a final charge over the house?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...