Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax - Court Costs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5681 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last year a £74 court cost got added to my bill when they put a Liability order on my Council Tax. Can you claim that back. I know my rent officer is gonna get my Rent Court Cost refunded.

 

So i was just wondering if you can do the same for Council Tax.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last year a £74 court cost got added to my bill when they put a Liability order on my Council Tax. Can you claim that back. I know my rent officer is gonna get my Rent Court Cost refunded.

 

So i was just wondering if you can do the same for Council Tax.

 

Thanks :)

 

If the liability order is valid - you can't claim it back. E.g., if you missed a payment, it's standard procedure to whack you with a liability order. It's not fair and a money making racket / tax on the poor in my book... but unfortunately the way it is.

 

I'm still fighting one where I got the court cost added because I was not even aware of the liability order.... they sent all the details for my current address to the old one. They flat out refuse to withdraw the charge so I need to work on my skills of telepathy, clearly. Words come to mind that would be inappropriate to post in this forum...

 

~G

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't a question about the liability order, this is about the penalty charge added to the liability order fee.

A liability order costs £3, the rest is a penalty charge and as with all penalty charges can be reclaimed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry al - although it is a penalty charge, it is not classed the same as bank charges and you will not be able to claim it back. This is an admin charge they add.

 

Why I say it is a penalty charge is because different councils add on different amounts, some add as much as £135 and others as low as £40, so it has to be a penalty.

 

In 2007 councils in England made £200,000,000 from these 'penalty' charges.

 

They now count liability orders as part of their income that is why they don't try very hard to get the tax from anyone, just one reminder and then court. They actually want people to default. (my opinion)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think it would be worth asking anyway and not in a reclaiming way just say writing a letter kindly asking if they would consider removing it as i know my Rent officer is doing the same for my Rent court cost once i get my arrears down.

 

as once my backdate for council tax benefit is sorted having that taken off i could pay the rest in one and then it's sorted.

 

But i suppose with the luck i'm having lately i might aswell not bother :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

al are you on any benefits? if you are then that would help your cause.

 

They will claim as ss points out above that it is admin charges.

 

Write asking them if they will justify the £71 added to the liability order and that you know the actual cost of the order is £3.

 

Tell them if they cannot justify the amount, will they please refund it as non justification will mean it is a penalty charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi can anyone help me with my letter i'm not sure what to put, this is what i have so far.

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

RE:

I’m writing regarding the cost of the Liability Orders put on both my Council Tax bills.

Please can you justify the £71.00 and £73.00 added to the Liability Orders as I know the true cost is actually £3.00.

If you cannot justify the amounts then please refund them to both to my account as non justification.

I’ve currently got a claim in for Housing and Council Tax Benefit and I’ve also requested a backdate to help me get back on track with my arrears and last years bill. I’m just waiting to receive some information before I can send it in.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I sent the letter to my local Council regarding the costs and thiese are the replies i got. Any advice please.

 

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t50/jensenjaredaholic/Documents107-1.jpg

 

Thanks AL

Edited by animal_lover
removed wrong link
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is total bunkum how they have 'tried' to justify the cost.

 

I.T. stationary etc are all budgeted into the normal years council tax. Accommodation - what the hell is that, are defaulters paying their mortgage for them.

 

Lets say reminders x5 (to be generous), spreadsheet to court (cost shared amongst all defaulters, in this case 4,315 (so 1p would be an over payment), liability order £3.

 

I would suggest that from start of the first reminder to them notifying you of the liability order £7 - but lets round that up to a tenner.

 

£65 profit.

 

But unless you can see the cost of these things and work them out on an individual basis, you can't call their bluff, so there is nothing you can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...