Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA won't accept written correspondence only...


lexis200
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 312
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just checked the wording on my DN – which is exactly the same as the one you posted – It refers to paragraph 8 of the agreement – which I presume they are referring to the application – funny thing is there isn’t a paragraph 8 on my application/agreement.

 

I had a quick peek at yours, although it’s hard to read but paragraph 8 on your application/agreement (if indeed it actually ever was on there in the first place) refers to APR and not minimum payments.

 

Both yours and my defaults (and probably a whole bunch of others) would prove to be invalid because they are referring to terms in the agreement that aren’t actually there. Once they terminate the agreement they won’t be able to undo this mistake.

 

When it ends up in court you would simply ask them to point out where paragraph 8 appears on the written agreement that has been signed by your OH – they won’t be able to – now the creditor is left in the unfortunate position of not complying with the requirements of issuing a valid DN – shame.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I love you Atwozee:D

 

I'm going to have to double check the actual 'agreement' when I get home this evening, but if you're right I'll be doing a little jig round the room:D

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya guys thought id say hello

 

well i do want to hear about your jig and remember if they have defaulted incorrectly and then terminate you, i have been told on my bos thread, they can only then claim any arrears at the time of the default or termination, i hope its good news and im correct with what ive just said

 

on the warpath with mbna myself later, i really need to update my threads, meaning to but life just gets in the way, lol

 

hope everyone is fine and keep positive all, and fingers crossed

 

laters angel x

  • Haha 1

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm currently at court stage with MBNA I did appear yesterday but it got postponed due to a staff clerical error wrong time on order.

 

Anyway my witness statement is based on exactly this CLAUSE 8 or lack off!

 

Maybe a good idea for you to check my thread here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/151709-help-10.html

 

What you need starts from page 10 if you need to use anything in my post that PT has help me with you are more than welcome.

 

Regards

 

Pompeyfaith

  • Haha 1

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pompey – does yours say paragraph 8 or clause 8? Not that there’s that much difference – they both amount to something that isn’t within the signed agreement.

No doubt MBNA will say its within separate terms or the latest version of the terms but that’s irrelevant because the detail of the DN is wrong which makes it invalid – once they terminate they cannot undo the error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, nothing to do with MBNA, but I'm hoping someone can give me a hand with a PPI letter I've got going for Halifax?:)

 

The only thing is that I'm missing a few months of statements from the beginning of the account (2001), but I'm not sure if it's worth the palaver of trying to get them, hence the sentence towards the bottom of the letter.

 

I've not done one of these before, so I've bastardised the template to help me. Any comments are very welcome - I don't want to muck it up!

 

Last thing - I'm currently trying to get hold of their historic terms for this insurance, and have emailed the company who held the cover. I'm going on their current terms which show OH should not have been sold this policy without being informed of the fairly massive exclusion provision that would have required him to close his company in order to claim!

 

Ref: My account

 

I believe I have been mis-sold a payment protection insurance policy and would like to request a full refund of my premiums, plus interest paid. I cancelled my policy in 2006 after being told I was not covered due to my job status (which had not changed since starting the policy), but have recently found out that I am entitled to claim back these charges, and the interest accumulated on them.

 

I bought a payment protection policy for my credit card payments in 2001, to cover me for unemployment if such a problem should arise.

 

I am a Director of a Limited company and therefore was not eligible for any payments from the PPI unless I closed my company.

 

My application form showed my job title as ‘Director’. However, I was not told at the time that as a Director I would not be able to make a claim on the PPI in the event of unemployment unless the company ceased trading. Had this been explained to me I would not have taken the policy out.

 

I only found this out on attempting to make a claim in 2006, when my company had not had business for some months and my income had dropped to nothing. After attempting to bring in business to no avail, I decided to use the policy I had paid for over the course of the previous 5 years, but was told I could not.

 

Insurers are under an obligation to ensure that the policy they are selling is appropriate to that customer and clearly, as my employment situation meant I was unable to claim on the policy without specific caveats being in place, you have not fulfilled this requirement.

 

I am requesting a full refund of all my insurance payments from July 2001, plus interest, which totals £6017.93. Please be aware I am only using this date as you have not furnished me with statements to the start of the account. In the circumstances I feel this is more than fair on my part.

 

If I do not receive a favourable response from you I will pursue this claim through the Financial Ombudsman.

Edited by steven4064
Text size

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And another for your perusal - an attempt at getting some missing statements from them using CB's very sound logic that if they can't provide them, how do I know they're not telling porkies about what's owed??:)

 

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST NON-COMPLIANCE

THIS IS NOT A NEW DATA REQUEST

Dear Mr X

 

Thank you for supplying me with information requested under my Subject Access Request made in September 2008.

 

I have recently been checking it, and it has come to my attention that there are several months of statements missing, spanning the period from account opening until June 2002. You have supplied statements from July 2002.

 

Please note I require these remaining statements. Without them, I can not be sure that the amounts shown on my account, or any brought-forward balances, are correct.

 

If you do not have these statements, I will require details of the records held showing that they have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, please provide a declaration, signed by an authorised officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data.

 

In addition, if you do not have these statements, I will require proof of the opening balance, any payments made to the account, any spending or other usage by me on the account, any balance transfers on the account, any interest accrued on the account, and any charges/fees placed on the account during the period in question.

 

I’m sure you can appreciate how important this information is with regards to ensuring my paperwork is correct, and I therefore look forward to your prompt response in dealing with the remainder of my SAR request.

 

I will re-iterate that this is not a new data request, but a request for the information that I should have received already to be sent. Please ensure I do not receive a letter requesting a fee for this service, as I have already paid it.

 

Lastly, although you should have it on my notes, for the avoidance of any doubt please ensure any and all correspondence is in writing only, as I will not discuss financial matters over the phone.

 

Any thoughts on this or my last letter (regarding the PPI)??

 

Thanks for looking!

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A little update for OH's MBNA account...

 

2 letters received today! The first, a handwritten envelope with no postage -no stamp, no mark; very strange. Anyway, that was telling OH that they don't hold transaction details this far back so he's not getting anything more. I'm not sure if there's much I can do about this. As you can see in the letter above, I stated I needed them to work out the opening balance, but tbh it was only really to find out what OH paid versus what he spent so I don't know whether I can be bothered to enter into a back and forth about it.

 

The second letter was from Debt Clear Recoveries and Investigations Ltd - anyone know of them? Apparently they are now handling the account for MBNA.

 

To me it seems like even though the DN stated they would terminate, they have not, as the account is just being managed by a DCA rather than being been sold to them. I was thinking of gettng OH to ring MBNA to confirm this, and get a letter saying as much if they have terminated. Is this a really bad idea or would it be ok?

 

The thing is I can't really do much until we know if it's terminated or not, so we're a bit in limbo until then.

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi VS

 

If you mean the DCA they actually haven't demanded anything, they've just stated what the current balance is at the bottom of the letter (after all the main text) and asked OH to phone them to 'potentially make arrangements to resolve the issue'.

 

There's no mention of whether 'resolving the issue' would involve monthly payments or paying them everything!

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

 

I think I'm having a girl moment:D Could you elaborate on that for me please as I'm a bit lost as to what the repudiation relates to? (I feel I should have one of these smilies :oops: to go with that statment!)

 

Feel free to include analogies of things to do with kittens and pink things so that I understand;):p

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be my fault as I am beginning to muddle up the cases I am following.

 

Here's how my mind was working:

 

If the Default Notice was defective, that can still be corrected until termination or something equivalent to termination.

 

Termination (or something equivalent) on the back of a duff DN amounts to a repudiation or repudiatory breach of the contract and that is what wipes out the debt other than any existing arrears.

 

An outright demand for payment in full is equivalent to termination (some disagree or are more cautious) and what you received is not unarguably equivalent to termination but it would be on the borderline, so really you'd want something clearer than that before going "yippee" too loudly.

 

If I've got this thread muddled with another one, I'm sorry for confusing the issue.

 

... and not a single kitten (apart from that one there) ;)

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's excellent, thank you very much - you didn't get it muddled I was just being a bit of a lemon:D I even understood it without the kittens being in there:)

 

I think you're right, I wouldn't be happy to argue the toss using that letter as evidence, as they don't at any point specifically say they want full payment, they do just have it showing as the balance. Admittedly I could take it to mean they want the lot, but I won't leap to conclusions.

 

This is why I wanted to see about getting OH to phone MBNA, just to say to them that he's received a letter from the DCA but hasn't had the termination letter from MBNA yet, and could he have it for his records. Very much playing the clueless debtor, and hopefully getting confirmation one way or another; without of course aluding to the DN, dodgy or otherwise.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lexis, I didnt realise you had an MBNA thread :)

 

I have to log off for a while so will catch up tomorrow. Meanwhile, Pelham has some rather interesting advice on the thread below. Might be worth a look.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/178139-taz11-mbna-enforceable.html

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lexis, at no time have MBNA sent me a physical Termination Notice. They had hinted at it in previous letters only.

 

I have received a rather suspect Notice of Assignment from Arrow/Fredrickson International. However, nothing from MBNA to say this was happening.

 

BTW, I think that Debt Clear are just a collection agent.

Edited by citizenB

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya all

 

take a peek at this thread i came across yesterday

 

laters angel x

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/181964-information-regarding-mbna-bank.html

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...