Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mot failed-unhappy with service!


BADMOTHER
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

My old T reg 206 failed it's MOT last week (no surprise there) so I booked it in with the garage who carried out the MOT to have the work done, which was rear break pads, a cylinder which i was quoted £45 ish for and the emmissions failed on the exhaust system.

I had the exhaust and cat fitted back in November from this same garage so i took along my receipt to cover any work for the exhaust. The garage hadn't contacted me all day so I went to collect the car at 3pm after work. They said they couldn't get the emissions down so had replaced a seal on the exhaust, that didn't work so they did an oil and filter change that didn't work so they sent for a "Lambda sensor" and fitted it which was about £80, they said the supplier had sent the wrong one so they would have tokeep the car overnight to wait for the new one next day. I said i needed to take the car home but would bring it back in the morning so they could test the emissions again. Next day i told him I didn't want him to put the lambda sensor on (cos we had googled it at home and saw them for £22.95 the guy says he had already fitted it and it wssn't the wrong one it just needed adjusting. I told him i wasn't happy about this and needed the bill itemising he still tried to charge me for the exhaust seal which was under warranty, in total he charged me £200. I picked the car and MOT up later that day but was fuming about the treatment I had received.

I just need to know if there is anybody I can complain to or is this "normal" for a garage. I hate the thought that they have seen me coming.

First Direct ** WON ** :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot adjust a lamda O2 sensor!!! check to see if they have actually fited one, they are pretty cheap, does not have to OEM lots will do the job. I think it si normal for garages they dont know waht they ae doing themselves half the time and pass the cost of them learing and trial and error bits on to you. Only pay for whats fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks raydetinu, well i have already handed over the fee, but i really felt i should be able to complain somewhere are they regulated by someone. I definetly won't be going back there.

First Direct ** WON ** :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope they are not regulated, non franchised garages can charge what they like!!

If you think what they have charged is unreasonable then ask for some money back ( that does not cost anything ). but to take it further you may need expert witnesses, reports, inspections to take it to court.

Lifes too short? chalk it up and use a garage you can trust but even that can go wrong. I took my car to garage that I had been happy with for years, but because the fault was out if the ordinary they took it apart did know what to do and it was in there for a year!! before I got it back, still not working right, so sold it straight away with fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG, well I suppose it could have been worse then. Thanks for the input raydetinu, yes I will have to just bite the bullet with this.:(

nevermind!

First Direct ** WON ** :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you break your teeth on biting bullets, check that you have a new oil filter and dip the oil to see that has also been changed. You can't change oil and filter too often so as long as you are happy with the price charged for that, then no harm done there.

I wouldn't have changed the oil though, I would have put in an additive if I suspected that was the problem.

 

What is this 'seal' on the exhaust. there is a gasket, but I don't see how that would effect the emmission if it leaked, and you would have known by the horrid noise it was making.

 

If they have fitted a genuine Lambda sensor then the price would be around what they said. The ones you saw were probably generic sensors and they don't always work how you wish, but next time it is suspected, it is a job you can do yourself and is worth the chance that it will work.

Also as Ray has said, you can't adjust a Lambda sensor, so that is the indication that you needed that they were plucking in the dark.

 

Has the air filter been checked? that can affect the emissions.

 

Have you got your failure certificate as well as your pass certificate?

 

P.S. If you can get your head underneath then have a look at the rear wheel hubs and see if you can see that they have changed the hydraulic cylinder.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 months later...

They have only tried helping you out by getting it through the emissions these 206 have crap engines and are difficult to get through the emissions anyway in theory they are just trying to do what they could to get it through!

Link to post
Share on other sites

for the poster above saying that they were just trying to help out!

I'm surprised that they replaced sensors etc.

 

earlier in the year when I had my MOT my car passed it's emission test, (well below the limit), but failed on some other things.

 

I took my time fixing the other things as it was the summer and I had my motorbike anyway to use, so I was out of time for a free re-test, I went to a different garage and the car passed on everything except the emissions test. which was now magically 4 times over the test limits.

 

basically, what had happened is the first test was done as soon as I took the car into the garage, (so the car had been driven the engine was very warm, the second test I left the car with them, they left the car sitting about all day... -they argue that they measure the oil temp to make sure that the engine is up-to temp, but clearly it does make a difference.

 

anyway, they advised that I just changed the fuel filter, and ran some cleaner through and changed the oil. I did this, and returned the next morning where the car passed...

 

the point is,

fuel cleaner - £5

engine flush - £5

oil - £10

fuel filter - £5

(all from Halfords).

 

if they "just wanted to help" then there are plenty of well known "tricks" that they can use, without making a huge bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are taking your car in for an MOT, give it the old "bypass decoke" beforehand. Lots of cars do short journeys only and basically choke themselves. Hold it in 3rd gear at highish revs for a mile or so, really does make a difference! If its a town runabout the oil can get contaminated with petrol and give a falsely high reading. First thing I do when a car fails is give it a good run... about a 60-70% sucess rate if the readings are withing what I'd expect to see because of this.Cats also need to be very ho to work at peak efficiency,and oil temp should be 80 degrees plus to do the test. Do this with diesels too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...