Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Consumer Action Group Strategy


clumch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Anyway the UK population are too docile, petty minded and lazy to actually stand up for their rights - so this thread is a waste of time.

 

We are just fodder to be ripped off and deceived by government and corporation.

 

 

CAG is all very well but the banks will just rewrite their terms and conditions and adapt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

- so this thread is a waste of time.

 

We are just fodder to be ripped off and deceived by government and corporation.

 

CAG is all very well but the banks will just rewrite their terms and conditions and adapt.

 

Well I would certainly agree with the first statement, you could not even make an hypothetical case out of this.

 

I also agree with the second statement, the fuel protests are a good example of this when compared with the action take by some other countries. But have those other countries population actually had the result they wanted from their protests.

 

There is nothing wrong with coming up with an idea for a campaign, but you will need to do some research beforehand to see if it is feasable.

 

P.S.

Yes you could send in bailiffs to all the addresses, they would love that, would certainly find the staff to do it, and would think that Christmas had come early.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the OP has thought this out quite well and, in theory, it would appear to work.

 

However, we are not French and protests such as this in the UK are unlikely to prevail.

 

Anything like this has to begin, or initially involve London, and they couldn't care for each other let alone the whole country.

 

9/10 for effort & thought, 1/10 for it to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

"it would be incredibly foolish not to pay council tax as a political statement, unless you are willing to go to jail."

 

The prisons are full, yet incredibly ever now and then you see a pensioner get locked up for non payment of council tax.

 

I sympathise with the OP, council tax is shockingly bad. Every year the bill goes up by 5% or so but my council remains fantastically inept at even very simple tasks.

 

For the moment I can afford to pay it, but I would suggest more people will feel the kind of frustration I feel if the bill continues to rise.

 

There must be a level at which it causes real hardship, and if enough people refused to pay I believe it could bring about change.

 

It is impossible to lock everybody up, the problem lies in getting people to do anything.

 

If we made a pack to all not pay it and suffer the consequences the system would be paralysed. Trouble is anyone who works in a bank, for the police, as a barrister, and loads of other jobs aren't allowed to have a criminal record so they are out.

 

Very few people would actually engage on such a risky course unless they felt they had no alternative. If things carry on as they are this is a real possibility.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...