Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mc kenzie hall just rang


mo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5630 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,i have a debt with black horse,i have been payhing them 10.00 a month with there agrement,then out of the blue, i get a phone call from mckensie askin for full balance,i explained i am in incapacityh,and that the ammount she asked for was in dispute (a lot of charges and ppi i never asked for) asked if i could pay monthly she says no wants the full balance,or im goin to court,i told her then go for it and ill have my say in court,no she says it will all be done on paper and i wont appear in court,then theyh will seize my assetsor do other things,i wish id never heard of black horse,i only borrowed 1500.00,bout 4 years since,i will never be rid of them,just got everything on track paying monthly then this,just feel like puttin myh head in oven and not waking up,sorryh for goin on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

CCA request

 

 

Name

Address

Address

Postal Code

 

 

 

Date

 

 

 

COMPANY NAME

Address

Address

Address

Postal Code

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:− Account Number

 

With reference to the above agreement, we would be grateful if you would send us a copy of this credit agreement.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), we are entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. We enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

We understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

We understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

PRINT NAME HERE – DO NOT SIGN!!

 

Name

Link to post
Share on other sites

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

 

 

Your Name

 

 

Address

 

 

Address

 

 

Address

 

 

Address

 

 

Postal Code

 

 

 

Company Name

Address

Address

Address

Postal Code

 

Date

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

PRINT YOUR NAME ONLY – DO NOT SIGN!

 

 

Your Name

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard of any court action being undefendable which is what they are trying to imply so yes they are most definately lying - so yes report them and don't talk to them on the phone again as they will deny ever saying that

 

And get ready to send the telephone harassment letter

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Mo, they certainly are.

 

They cannot take your posessions, they're not bailiffs. If they try to take you to court they have to serve papers and you CAN defend in person.

 

DO NOT speak to them on the phone, if they call again say 'everything in writing only'.

 

Use the letters others have provided and don't worry about this bunch of numpties, they're paid to scare you into paying what you cannot afford.

 

As I mentioned earlier, report them as well, they're very known to East Ayshire Trading Standards and the OFT ;)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a telephone harassment letter even MH can understand:

 

 

- HARASSMENT WARNING -

WARNING; PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003. s127.

 

Telephone Number: {Your Telephone Number}

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

Dear Sir/Madam.

 

I am writing in relation to telephone calls that I have received from your organisation, which I deem to be personally harassing. I have verbally requested that these calls stop, but I am still receiving call. I now require the telephone number listed above to be completely removed from your systems.

 

I am in the view that your continued telephone calls put you in breach of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

 

This is a private telephone line, operated on a contract with the intention of receiving and making personal phone calls, I have not authorised any other member of my family to receive calls from your organisation using this PRIVATE TELEPHONE LINE.

 

By using this telephone number without my permission you are interferring with my ability to use my own private property for the duration of any call.

 

It is my right to require that this telephone line, which is licenced solely to myself, is kept clear for my own personal calls.

 

It is consquently my view that you are commiting the tort of interference with contract insofar as for the duration of each call you make to me without my permission, you are interfering with my contractual right to receive and make personal calls on my private telephone line.

 

Continued interference with my contractual rights in this manner may result in legal action.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to the Office of Communications, Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you may be liable for a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that all telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks everyone,i think she was talking bout a ccj,dont know wat that means,i still feel rubbish tho,i thought everthing was bein paid,i only paid them 20th june.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mo - you have been paying under an agreement and haven't defaulted - IF they take it to court they are on dodgy ground but will still make the threats. Also as you are on incapacity there is a chance that IF they do take you to court the judge could stipulate a lower monthly payment and they know it.

 

Also IF they take it to court the judge makies the decision not them, they are not in a strong position so try not to let them bully you. Put anything in writing we can guarentee that nothing thye put in writing will be so strongly woreded as that telephone conversation as they will be in soo much poo if they do it - it will still be threatening but watch for the word MAY - it gets used all the time and usually comes to nothing

 

How are your PPI and charges claims going on??

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mo, dont listen to MH's lies... Do as advised by the others and you will be ok.

 

If, as you said you have kept to an agreement and not broken it then a judge would not look very kindly at MH for wasting the courts time.

 

MH know this, but they hope you dont.

 

In the mean time while waiting for your telephone harassment letter to reach them .......

 

If they do call again just refuse to answer the security questions and tell them 'everything in writing'.

If they tell you you must answer the security questions just repeat 'everything in writing' and hang up. There is no obgliation to speak to anyone on the telephone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mo,

 

Don't let them bully you into anything. These people will say anything to get money out of you. They are basically lying to you - not that they'd ever admit saying what they have. Pretty much all of DCA's will use all sorts of underhand tactics which simply aren't allowed. I can well imagine the tone and threats used during the call as I've had many. Thankfully since finding this site I know exactly how to deal with them - I've even managed to get them to hang up on me a number of times :).

 

Don't speak to them on over phone as others say, simply tell them you only wish to communicate in writing.

 

Make sure you get a CCA request off to them, as unless they provide you with valid CCA the alleged debt would not be enforceable in court. If they write back telling you that they dont need to provide one blah blah, take no notice - they do, by law. I would also consider an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to get a breakdown of how they arrive at the figure you supposedly owe. Again they must provide you with this.

 

Make sure you send the CCA and S.A.R by recorded delivery.

 

Remember, they cannot take any of your possessions or make you pay anything - they have no legal right to do so and should not be leading you to believe they have.

 

I can't see why they would even consider taking this to court - if you are paying an agreed amount and have kept up with payments, the court would see this as wasting their time. As others say, if they did go down that route, you could even end up paying them less than you are now.

 

Keep positive and try not to worry.

 

Boss-Man

Edited by Boss-man
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks,i said that i was up to date with my arrangement,and she said b.h. only said it was a temp thing and coul ask for the full amount at any time,the ppi i fel a bit daunted byh this process,when i took the loan out it was just added on i know this was stupid on myh part but i just payed it,i had an opp for breast cancer before this loan,and have had complications since the loan hence not workin,i tried to claim on it when i first went sick,only to be told sorry pre existing condition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mo - Have you sent anything off regarding a PPI claim yet - there are some good templates on here and other sites. I am hammering Lloyds with this one it makes a significant difference to the debt figure and further weakens them

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mo I can sympathise really - I got like that too and I am sure everyone on here still gets days like that out of sheer frstration when the bar stools haven't bothered to read anything yet again - find the templates and send the first letter it helps just knowing you have done something - and the firt step is the hardest but we will give you a friendly kick or virtual hug :)any time you ask

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i havent,i feel like all the stuffing been kicked out of me

 

I know from experience how these scumbags can make you feel. Just try to ignore them, they are the lowest of the low feeding off other peoples mis-fortune. Pure vermin!

 

Keep your head up, there are so many people on here who will help you.

 

Make sure you get the CCA request off to them, as without a valid CCA there's nothing they can do ;).

 

They are simply making empty threats and telling lies in a feeble attempt to get you to pay up. Take no notice of them.

 

Boss-Man

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...