Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA and Payment Protection


wishiwasrich
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5768 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My MBNA card predated a redundancy and setting up my own firm. As the latter two were so close together I didn't claim the PPC insurance at the time. However (and this is nearly 5 years ago) I did tell MBNA on a number of occasions that I was self-employed as Director of a Ltd co thus did not believe they should charge the PPC as they wouldn't let me claim. They repeatedly said they WOULD cover me.

 

Lo and behold I had to shut the business due to a family illness abroad. Several calls to MBNA later (and several of their's to me where I told them their insurance should be making payments not me) they first claimed they didn't know which insurer it was. Then it took a month to send me the insurance forms. Then nothing. In the meantime I paid the outstanding due as I had started a temp job. Still nothing. My latest statement they are STILL charging me for this. I've called to complain twice and been put on hold for 40 mins plus whilst they bounce me around.

 

I want the entire amount of PPC back I have paid over the last 5 years which must amount to 1000s - do I have a case? My husband thinks I should report them to the FSA

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck with the claim - my experience of MBNA is that the insurance I had on my CC refused to pay out on the basis I wasn't paying UK national insurance at the time i didn't work due to illness (stress/anxiety). I'm sure they'll have a sub clause that matches your exact circumstances and well !! They are simply an awful company to deal with though.

 

From what I understand if you have been mis-sold the insurance you have every right to claim it back. How you would go about proving this is another matter and one I'll leave to more qualified people to answer.

 

The good news is that you came to the right place - this forum has been invaluable in helping me deal with MBNA and I doubt I could have managed without them.

 

Good luck :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello wishiwasrich!

 

Agree with Hamish2008 that the MBNA are no fun to deal with.

 

But on the PPI front, you may have a Claim angle as you could say you were not Self-Employed...and just Claim as anyone else would claim if they lost their Job and were made Redundant.

 

By that, I mean that if you were a Director of a Limited Company then, technically, you are an Employee of that Company. Sure, you are also a Director, so also an Employer and an Employee, but in the eyes of the Law I think you are classed as Employed not Self-Employed. You would Pay different National Insurance for a start, which could also help prove this point.

 

Self-Employed usually means a Sole Trader or a conventional Partnership (not a Limited Liability Partnership, as that's a sortof Company).

 

OK, this could mean you just say you were made Redundant, and the PPI should then cover you without all the nonsese that a Self-Employed Person has to try and prove to get the same PPI Payments.

 

If there were two Directiors, even better, then each could write a nice Letter giving the other the sack, and so satisfy the PPI Cover Requirement for being "made redundant" as opposed to Closing the Business.

 

Of course, the alternatice is to stick to your original plan and just claim for the whole of the useless PPI back. At least this may give you an alternative, whichever is the most financially rewarding for you!

 

Hope this helps...and good luck, I hope you nail them to the floor, one way or another.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't even been told the claim is invalid - the insurance arm dont answer my calls nor ever responded to the claim but say MBNA had no right to say I was covered that is up to them. MBNA bounce it back to insurers and still refuse to cancel the cover!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all btw. I'm trying to balance job hunting and trying to make some money with the time it takes to chase all of these things. My OH is an insurance agent in a mutual (one of the good guys I promise) and he is utterly disgusted with them... he found this site for me after a particularly bad day. He is FSA registered so we cannot have defaults on our home address hence I've tried to play nicely with everyone and deal with all in an ethical, polite manner - shame the other side don't do the same

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello wishiwasrich!

 

I've tried to play nicely with everyone and deal with all in an ethical, polite manner - shame the other side don't do the same

 

The trouble is, after getting you where they wanted to start with, after that, these bankers don't do ethical, and they certainly don't do polite. Their concentration is either on your Debit Card Number when they want Payment, or on baffling you with spurious nonsesense if you want something from them.

 

Just keep everything in Writing, and build up a folder of evidence as you go along. At some point, this will win the battle, or at least will produce a result that is favourable to you and not them.

 

However, it will take time and I regret that there is no substitute to beat them than plain hard work until you wear them down.

 

Start researching mis-Sold PPI, and I would suggest in your case it would be worth sending them £10 and a far reaching and exhaustive S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). The reason for this, is to find out as much as you can about the PPI and how it was offered and then arranged.

 

Dig out any Paperwork you may have, as that may start to show little bits of evidence that you can use. For example, was the PPI Sold to you on an Advised or Non-Advised basis? Most bankers will claim the latter, but their PPI Sales Bumf and actual Selling Techniques could well prove the former.

 

Check out Alanalana's Thread on his claims to get PPI back, here's the CAG Thread Link:

 

alanalana PPI claim against RBS (looking for some help) please

 

I also have a Thread on PPI, although I'm currently fighting them on having valid Agreements at the moment, so my own PPI Reclaims are on hold whilst I thrash out the Agreement issues. But here's the CAG Thread Link:

 

MBNA PPI Unsecured Loans Eyes Wide Shut

 

Between the above, you may get a feel for some of the PPI issues, and/or may work out likely areas for further research.

 

Here are a few other links that may help:

 

(1) Competition Commission's Investigation into PPI.

 

(2) FSA Consumers to benefit from PPI refunds agreement.

 

(3) Which? PPI - the rules Were you mis-sold?

 

(4) DebtAdviceBureau Payment Protection Insurance: Peace of Mind - Until You Make a Claim

 

(5) thisismoney.co.uk Reclaim your PPI premiums

 

(6) Fool.co.uk The Death Of Rip-off Insurance?

 

OK...that should get you started!

 

Hope this helps.

 

Cheers,

BRW

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...