Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Messy seperation, 3 yr old involved...any help much appreciated


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5764 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is going to be long winded but i will do the best i can.

 

The Brief:-

 

This is matter concerning my sister, her otherhalf and thier yound 3yr old son. Sister and otherhalf are not married but had been living together in his house for the last couple of years, they have two dogs (one each!)

Otherhalf works full time in a reasonably well paid job, sister works part time in an ok paid job. Sister is 25 years old

 

In more detail:-

 

My sister met her otherhalf about 4 years ago, she moved in with him and she fell pregnant. About a year after the birth they decided they needed a bigger house, so he purchased one all in his name. Things were going well, she was not paying anything towards the mortgage but she was contributing towards the household bills. They also got two dogs to complete the family set up.

 

About three years later it all wents tits up. She and her son moved out of the home and are now back with her mum and dad. Which is not practical to say the least. Dad is 71 tommorrow. Sister has applied to get on the Council Housing List

 

Ex agreed to pay her 30.00 per week maintenance and they agreed to have each have the son 3.5 days a week. Ex wanted to get this writing but it was finally agreed verbally and has been working ok.

 

Ex kept one dog the other dog is virtually homeless (it is with a neighbour who does not want it anymore)

 

This is the bit where i go mad, why she couldn't wait a little longer i will never know!!!

 

Sister has met someone else (they do not live together, he lives with his sister), but rather than keeping it quiet until the dust settled has chosen to tell the ex. Ex has gone mad and has now started demanding all sorts, this is what he is demanding:-

 

The son must not have any contact with the new bloke

The son must be in bed by a certain time

 

and

 

Ex is going to apply for half of ALL sisters income as she is now in a relationship with a man who is in full time employment and wants funding for the time he has son.

 

There is probably more stuff but the last one is the one that concerns me at the moment.

 

Firstly can he apply for half her money?

What rights as a father does he have (his name is on the birth certificate)?

 

She is going to see a solicitor to see if she can get legal aid, she wants to take this to court to get an amicable agreement signed.

 

Has anyone got any advice?

 

Mods - sorry if i have put this in the wrong place but i couldn't find a particular thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has no entitlement to half her income, either because she is in a relationship, or becuase he has shared care, he cannot have the earnings of what may be only a short term relationship taken into account. Even long term he would struggle.

 

What has happened to the former family home, has the split of the equity been taken into account and your sister received her share?

 

He can ask that your sister puts the child to bed at a reasonable time, and that he doesn't meet the new partner, but without a very substantial reason, he could not get it incorporated into a court agreement.

 

I would suggets that your sister sees a solicitor, and gets further advice.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the CSA site it gives a calculator for working out payments.

 

£200 a week wages pays £12 a week to the child. If a parent has 3.5

days access.

 

Also could it cost him more if he goes for her wages as you said he has a good job. So he could be the one who ends up paying more, and once child goes to school or the dad gets a girlfriend I bet the mum ends up with having the child more than the dad does.

 

I'm a single mum, he has no say in who your child can see.

 

Bedtimes, well just say he is in bed by then anyway, but demand the dad has the child in bed at the same time.

 

Unless the child is badly treated tell her it's all just a bloke trying to play power games because she has moved on and he hasn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has no entitlement to half her income, either because she is in a relationship, or becuase he has shared care, he cannot have the earnings of what may be only a short term relationship taken into account. Even long term he would struggle.

 

What has happened to the former family home, has the split of the equity been taken into account and your sister received her share?

 

He can ask that your sister puts the child to bed at a reasonable time, and that he doesn't meet the new partner, but without a very substantial reason, he could not get it incorporated into a court agreement.

 

I would suggets that your sister sees a solicitor, and gets further advice.

 

The Ex owns the family home and he has no intention of selling it. He advised her that as she has had free use of the facilities she has no claim to the house or its equity, basically not entitled to anything.

 

She only paid a share of the bills, he dealt with the mortgage etc.

 

Also from what i understand this co-habiting business i.e he/she is entitled to half is not quite true as it wasn't actually made law??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the CSA site it gives a calculator for working out payments.

 

£200 a week wages pays £12 a week to the child. If a parent has 3.5

days access.

 

Also could it cost him more if he goes for her wages as you said he has a good job. So he could be the one who ends up paying more, and once child goes to school or the dad gets a girlfriend I bet the mum ends up with having the child more than the dad does.

 

I'm a single mum, he has no say in who your child can see.

 

Bedtimes, well just say he is in bed by then anyway, but demand the dad has the child in bed at the same time.

 

Unless the child is badly treated tell her it's all just a bloke trying to play power games because she has moved on and he hasn't.

 

Apparently he has alreday used the calculator and that is where he got his figure to pay her from.

 

The guy is being a Piers Morgan. He phones everynight at exactly 6.50pm (as the child is bathed just before 7) to say goodnight and if the son is not ready to go to bed he goes bonkers!

 

He is definately playing power games, sister is seeing a solicitor it's just nice to hear other peoples experiences or views.

 

Sister also has the problem of the dog, the neighbour does not want it, Ex does not want it. Mum and dads house is too small, its a 2 bed bungalow with 2 dogs already. Anyone want a 11 month black Lab???

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ex owns the family home and he has no intention of selling it. He advised her that as she has had free use of the facilities she has no claim to the house or its equity, basically not entitled to anything.

 

She only paid a share of the bills, he dealt with the mortgage etc.

 

Also from what i understand this co-habiting business i.e he/she is entitled to half is not quite true as it wasn't actually made law??

 

This is totally different where there are children involved. I suggest she stops listening to what he tells her and gets some legal advice.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then he knows the 1/2 wages is a lie.

 

So he must be on £500 a week net.

 

I think the best thing she can do is send the dog to one of the homes that rehouse the pets that way she will know the dog is safe.

 

Get her to make sure she has a housing office and also a doctors note to say it's not good for her or your parents to be housed together as it's causing stress.

 

I know he wants to be involved with the child but she needs to speak to him about his attitude, and explain it is causing his child to be upset.

 

Since she left she has no rights to the house it seems, if she had stayed she could have made him pay for the house. It also says she needs to be careful she isn't classed as making herself homeless as they won't rehouse her.

 

His name being on the birth cert gives him rights to read school report and stuff like the doctors, and about holidays abroad so becareful he can object.

Edited by breeze1996
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...