Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Loanmakers PPI [GE money] reclaiming & the judicial review Purchased it Before Jan 05


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have contacted Loanmakers about being missold PPI.

It was sold to me in September 2003.

Loanmakers have rejected my claim due to the date it was sold stating that i was given an "information only service " from them and it was my chioce to proceed with the policy.They have stated that "General Insurance "was not regulated until January 2005.

Could anybody advise me on how to proceed with this claim. The FOS have said they cannot handle the case because of when it was taken out.

Has anybody else come up against this problem?

Does anybody know if this complaint can be taken to the Small Claims Court or has anyone gone down this route.

Any information would be greatly appreceiated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

My brother in law has a similar problem, to be honest he was able to cancel but got nothing back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They may have been regulated by the Financial Leasing Association before 2005, worth checking on their website to see if the company was under their watchful eye. You can then make a complaint to them if it was under their juristriction.

 

Here is a link:

 

FLA :: Complaints :: Complaints

 

Worth checking first with a phone call to see if that company was registered there. If you have no joy there, then you probably will have to file a court claim against them.

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help ukaviator.Loanmakers are not listed as members of the FLA. I have have written to Loanmakers giving them 14 days to refund my money or face having to go to court.I think this is going to drag on a little but i have plenty of time so will keep trying.

Do you know of anyone who has taken loanmakers to court and if so what was the result?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Could someone please clarify who is responsible for PPI if the company that sold it i.e Loanmakers has gone bust.

 

I had a loan through Loanmakers they got me the loan with G.E,Money

they also conned me into taking out PPI with Cardif Pinnacle.

 

So who is responsible for the mis-selling of the PPI.

 

Both G E Money and Cardif Pinnacle deny responsibility.

 

The person at Cardif pinnacle said that G E Money were responsible and they say that Loanmakers are responsible.

 

Both of these companies say that because they did not sell the PPI it is not their problem.

 

I have been in contact with the FOS and they stated to me that because the loan was taken out in 2003 Cardif Pinnacle are the one

i should claim against because they provided the PPI policy and if i were to have made a claim they are the ones that i would claim against.

 

I have written to both companies giving them 7 days to refund my money

or i will take them to the Small Claims Court.

 

I have just got to work out which company to sue.

Any advice to end this confusion would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, you are doing things absolutely incorrectly by making wild threats to everyone when it is clear that you are not sure where you stand.

Don't expect these people to be fazed by your bluff.

They receive hundreds of hot air letters every week and they know that almost all of them will go away and die. You don't do yourself - or anyone else any favours.

 

I think that we need to know who has had the benefit of your premiums and in what way was the loan missold. Are you not an insurable risk in some way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have the wrong end of the stick here,

 

i am not making threats i was acting on information provided by the FOS. do you know better than them?.

 

My premiums for the PPI went to the insurer obviously.

 

The loan was provided by G E Money i have already stated that.

 

You should know that most PPI was mis-sold,

like most people who got conned into having it i was not told about it being only for me when in fact my loan was in joint names,

i was not told it only covered 5 years when the loan was longer .

I was not asked about any pre-existing medical conditions

i might have.the policy was loaded onto the front of the loan,

 

correct me if i am wrong but this is not allowed now.

 

The list goes on it is a classic case of a mis-sold policy.

 

The person i spoke to at Cardif Pinnacle the PPI provider even told me that,

but he was just trying to pass the buck and blame either G E Money or Loanmakers.

 

I said to him that if i had tried to claim on this policy they would claim that for what ever reason they wanted

i was advised that i could not claim and was told about it at the time of the sale.

They cannot have their cake and eat it.

I hope this explains my reasons for claiming .i would appreciate any help that you might be able to offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have the wrong end of the stick here, i am not making threats i was acting on information provided by the FOS. do you know better than them?.My premiums for the PPI went to the insurer obviously.The loan was provided by G E Money i have already stated that.You should know that most PPI was mis-sold, like most people who got conned into having it i was not told about it being only for me when in fact my loan was in joint names, i was not told it only covered 5 years when the loan was longer .I was not asked about any pre-existing medical conditions i might have.the policy was loaded onto the front of the loan, correct me if i am wrong but this is not allowed now.The list goes on it is a classic case of a mis-sold policy.The person i spoke to at Cardif Pinnacle the PPI provider even told me that, but he was just trying to pass the buck and blame either G E Money or Loanmakers.

 

I think cannonfodder was referring to your remarks that you have given 2 firms 7 days to refund or you are taking them to court.

 

First of all firms have 8 weeks to investigate complaints.

 

Secondly,you need to write to the company that sold you the ppi. Which is loanmakers, and give them 8 weeks!

 

Ge provided the lending and cardif pinnacle are the insurer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read my first comment it clearly states that the company that sold the PPI is Loanmakers and they have gone bust, as to the companies having 8 weeks to reply this has been going on since last year so they have had more than 8 weeks to reply.I will be following the advice i received from the FOS and will be taking Cardif Pinnacle to court. If anyone knows any better advice then please post it here for not just my benefit but anyone else in the same situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I am in a similar situation. In 2003, Loanmakers set up a loan for me on behalf of Paragon Finance, which included a forced sale of PPI as a condition of approval. Loanmakers went bust in 2009, and are without doubt responsible for the illegal sell of the PPI. I complained to Creditflex who acquired the Loanmakers name last year, although they have since changed again to Gopher Finance. They of course accept no responsibility and suggested I claim against Paragon (the lender), which I did. Paragon also accept no responsibility, blaming Loanmakers entirely and suggest I claim through the FSCS.

 

However, I am not so sure of Paragon's innocence. Yes I agree that the bankrupt broker missold the PPI to gain a higher commission, but at the end of the day it is Paragon that benefited from the inflated loan repayments as a result, whether they were aware or not. Money was paid to them unfairly, regardless of who set the loan up and in my eyes it is them who should pay it back now that the problem has been exposed. I do not blame Paragon for misselling the PPI, as they did not. I do blame them for keeping my money now that the truth has been revealed.

 

Do I press on with my pursuit of Paragon, do I contact the FOS, or do I contact the FSCS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

You claim from whoever you were payng the premiums to. As the premium was included in the loan, it is whoever your loan repayments were made to. In my view this would be GE.

 

Have a look around the ppi threads....you wll find the answers in there.....and become more effective at how to proceed with your claim.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Can anyone inform me if the judicial review covers banks only or do all PPI providers including GE Money have to adhere to its ruling.I have spoke to GE Money and they say the ruling does not apply to them.Any information would be greatly appreciated especially any links that have apply to GE Money or other similar lenders.:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so ge are wriggling?

 

nothing new there

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

three threads merged on the same ppi reclaim

for history sake

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a look round the forums, you will find plenty of GE money claims and successes.

 

Perhaps GE Money would like to provide confirmation/proof that they are not bound by any of the Judicial review.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...