Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LLoyds TSB/More Than added PPI to my credit card acc in 2003 when I was a f/t uni student!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I'm looking for a bit of advice. I am experiencing some hardship problems at the moment and missed a payment on my Lloyds credit card so had a nice phone call from a lady from Lloyds. I explained my situation to her and after arranging a reduced monthly payment for 6 months she said 'did you know you have insurance on the card' - I said no, and she gave me a number to make a claim.

 

Now firstly, I didn't know I had this, and secondly when I got the card (originally with MoreThan) back in 2003, I was a full time student, and certainly not working more than 16 hours a week so I should not have been sold it in the first place.

 

I have previously asked Lloyds for my signed credit agreement, what I got back was a photocopy half the size of what the original document would have been, but I can just about make out that there is a box with 'you have indicated you will accept the following insurances' with a box underneath which has 'Payment Protection Insurance' typed into it. My signature appears only in the credit agreement box.

 

Whats more, this is the original credit agreement from MoreThan (which Lloyds sent me) and it doesn't mention Lloyds anywhere although I assume it is all controlled by the same bank eventually.

 

Can anyone advise me on the best thing to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello bryony,

 

Hi everyone, I'm looking for a bit of advice. I am experiencing some hardship problems at the moment and missed a payment on my Lloyds credit card so had a nice phone call from a lady from Lloyds. I explained my situation to her and after arranging a reduced monthly payment for 6 months she said 'did you know you have insurance on the card' - I said no, and she gave me a number to make a claim.

 

first question, did you make a claim?

 

Now firstly, I didn't know I had this, and secondly when I got the card (originally with MoreThan) back in 2003, I was a full time student, and certainly not working more than 16 hours a week so I should not have been sold it in the first place.

 

 

For claims before 2005 and the FSA ruling from which campaign

Payment protection | Were you mis-sold PPI? | PPI - rules before 2005

Payment protection | Were you mis-sold PPI? | PPI - the rules

 

For legal issues relating to Data Protection check this link...Lots of very useful info in understandable terms.

Data Protection | OUT-LAW.COM

 

it includes the following and much much more

Negotiating with the Data Subject (This should be important to Banks)

 

At this stage, it is advisable to negotiate with the data subject. The location information the data subject will have already given will give a clue as to what it is the data subject really wants to have information about. The benefit of the Data Protection Act 1998 is that it allows data controllers to negotiate with data subjects to get the data subject to specify the exact information he or she wishes to receive.

 

The data controller is entitled to ask for a fee of £10 and two further pieces of information. Firstly, the data controller must satisfy himself that the person making the request is, in fact, the data subject. The use of a subject access request form is advised, since the greatest breach of a data controller's security is for the data controller to satisfy a subject access request made by a person impersonating the data subject. The use of the form goes towards proving that the data controller has adequate identification and verification procedures in place. Secondly, the data controller is entitled to ask the data subject for further information to enable the data controller to locate the information which that person seeks.

 

When the last of these three pieces of information has been obtained, the forty day period starts to run. It is advisable to put procedures in place to ensure that the receipt of the request and the further information is correctly dated so that an organisation knows how long it has to satisfy the subject access request.

 

 

I have previously asked Lloyds for my signed credit agreement, what I got back was a photocopy half the size of what the original document would have been, but I can just about make out that there is a box with 'you have indicated you will accept the following insurances' with a box underneath which has 'Payment Protection Insurance' typed into it. My signature appears only in the credit agreement box.

 

Whats more, this is the original credit agreement from MoreThan (which Lloyds sent me) and it doesn't mention Lloyds anywhere although I assume it is all controlled by the same bank eventually.

 

This could be a case of mis-selling but you will need to check all your paperwork. If you do no have the originals you can submit a SAR which will cost a statutory £10.00 fee.

 

Full S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) for ppi from hellhasnofury post in stickies at top of forum.

 

I would suggest a good check through the stickies and links it is time consuming but there is a lot of useful information to be gleaned. Also read a few other threads to get the general idea of what is happening in the PPI reclaim forum.

 

Hope this helps to get you started;-)

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I didn't make a claim. I didn't have a proper job for a couple of months but I'm registered self employed as I also do some freelance web design work so there would have been no point making a claim, so in fact the insurance is still not relevant to me!

 

I've had a look at the pre-2005 rules and as far as I can tell, it has been missold as it was clearly not suitable for me at the time as I would have had to have been working over 16hrs a week. I have all my paperwork I think so shouldn't need to send a SAR.

 

I've read loads of the threads on here and by the looks of it I'm going to have another fight on my hands!

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck with your fight,

 

I will follow your thread

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Over a month ago I sent a letter to reclaim my PPI charges, a week or so later they replied saying they were dealing with my claim, then...

 

Got 2 letters in the post today, one telling me that card services in Brighton are very sorry but they have to come to a conclusion about my complaint, and one stating that they don't think the policy was missold and they will not be repaying my premiums. They are both dated 31st July!

 

They have stated that as a student I would have been eligible for some small parts of the policy and then that if at some point I became employed, I would have been eligible for the unemployment and sickness cover. They then go on the say it was my responsibility to check the policy documents. I have looked for said documents and although I have everything else that came with my card, no documents. The only mention of PPI I can find is a very small computer checked box on my agreement (which they sent me, its not easy to read as it appears to be a bad photocopy).

 

They then go on to say ' We have also sent you monthly statements which have shown the premiums charged and had you wished to query these premiums or cancel the cover, you could have contacted us at any time'. Well isn't that what I'm doing now? I never queried them before as I believed that this was something that came with the card and I had no choice in.

 

Any advice on the best move forwards from this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello bryony,,

 

 

Over a month ago I sent a letter to reclaim my PPI charges, a week or so later they replied saying they were dealing with my claim, then...

 

Got 2 letters in the post today, one telling me that card services in Brighton are very sorry but they have to come to a conclusion about my complaint, and one stating that they don't think the policy was missold and they will not be repaying my premiums. They are both dated 31st July!

 

They have stated that as a student I would have been eligible for some small parts of the policy and then that if at some point I became employed, I would have been eligible for the unemployment and sickness cover. (This is total fob off. A Policy document is a policy document the cannot say as a student some parts were appropriate and then when you get a job other parts are appropriate total **** or words to that effect)They then go on the say it was my responsibility to check the policy documents. I have looked for said documents and although I have everything else that came with my card, no documents. The only mention of PPI I can find is a very small computer checked box on my agreement (which they sent me, its not easy to read as it appears to be a bad photocopy).

 

They then go on to say ' We have also sent you monthly statements which have shown the premiums charged and had you wished to query these premiums or cancel the cover, you could have contacted us at any time'. Well isn't that what I'm doing now? I never queried them before as I believed that this was something that came with the card and I had no choice in.

Any advice on the best move forwards from this?

 

Respond with a letter stating they are totally flouting the PPI agreement and changing the Terms and Conditions to suit themselves.

 

Then hit them with a request for the following: (Copied from another thread with advice on SAR)

 

Have you sent a Subject Access Request asking for all the subject data on you and this particular barclays loan or credit card?

 

If not and you do not have the original paperwork then you can submit a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) with a statutory fee of £10.00 (a postal order is best and keep the receipt you may be able to claim the £10 back) and request all the data applicable to you as a subject and in particular the loan you are contesting.

 

They have a statutory 40 days to respond and if you do not get all the data you ask for (and you must ask for every bit of data in whatever format they hold, paper, tape, microfisch, cd, electronic, telephone call recordings or transcripts, etc) You must be specific and ask for Terms and conditions, Customer duty of care check list (if the sale was and advised sale, i.e you talked to a sales advisor) Policy documentation, statement of account etc, then you can submit a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office or start Court action. The Information Commissioners Office is very busy so many complaints on PPI but no Court costs. Such is the magnitude of PPI mis-selling.

 

Good luck :wink: keep posting and you will get the required help.

However this PPI reclaiming is new and still in its early stages but things are coming together and CAG subscribers are real fighters.

 

Keep at them make life as uncomfortable for them as they are making it for you

 

 

aa;-)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...