Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Financial / Portfolio / whatever they're called..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In August 2007 I received a letter from these chumps asking for repayment of a debt they had bought from HSBC for an unpaid overdraft of an account I held back back around 2001. I knew I owed the money so began a payment schedule and have been paying just £20 a month till now. I've been trying to secure a loan but am having problems due to the default notice played on my profile in 2004 by these guys, so I gave them a call to see if they'd be willing to settle the debt for a lower figure than what was owed, hoping this would then repair my credit profile. They agreed to wipe a few hundred pounds of the debt and I'm due to pay the sum in a few weeks. However after doing some research I've learnt that paying off the debt might not remove the default notice from my account, which puts me back to square one. I've read some of the threads about Lowell and they sound dodgy to say the least....

 

I'm in the process of drafting a CCA letter to them, but seeing as how I've been paying them till now do I have a leg to stand on in challenging the debt? Even if I was to pay them the amount, what are the chances they would remove the default notice from my profile, and not just change it to satisified?

 

I understand some people have been having difficulties sending Lowell recorded letters due to them having a PO box address; is the Enterprise House, 1 Apex view address working ok?

 

Many thanks for your help, all suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In August 2007 I received a letter from these chumps asking for repayment of a debt they had bought from HSBC for an unpaid overdraft of an account I held back back around 2001.

Between 2001 and 2007 did you acknowledge this debt in any way either by making an offer of payment or a payment towards the account? If the debt has not been acknowledged for a cotinuous period of 6 years then it is statute barred.
However after doing some research I've learnt that paying off the debt might not remove the default notice from my account, which puts me back to square one.
Correct. The default would be simply marked as satisfied which in reality doesn't really change your credit rating. If you are to come to a settlement you must make the default removal a condition of the settlement and have Lowell's acceptance confirmed in writing.
I'm in the process of drafting a CCA letter

An overdraft is running account credit but the agreement is different for overdrafts than for other credit agreements. Section 74 of the Act allows for certain types of agreement to be excluded from part V (form and content) where the OFT has so determined. This detemination (the Determination) regarding overdrafts under section 74 was made on 21 December 1989 subject to three conditions.

 

(a) That the creditor shall have informed in writing the OFT of his general intention to enter into agreements to which the Determination will apply;

 

(b) that...the debtor shall be informed at the time or before the agreement is concluded

- of the credit limit, if any;

- of the annual rate of interest and charges applicable from the time the agreement is concluded and the conditions under which these may be amended;

- of the procedure for terminating the agreement

and this information shall be confirmed in writing.

 

© that where a debtor overdraws his current account with the tacit agreement of the creditor and that account remains overdrawn for more than 3 months, the creditor must inform the debtor in writing no later than 7 days after that 3 month period of the annual rate of interest and charges applicable.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wishes I could explain things like Rory :D

 

 

But if nanj has been making payments after the 6 years does that not start the ball rolling again?

 

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if nanj has been making payments after the 6 years does that not start the ball rolling again?

 

No. Once a debt is statute barred it remains so. It can not be unstatute barred.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Rory,.

 

What does statute barred mean? Nope, I made no contact or attempt to repay the debt between 2001 and 2007 or made any contact with HSBC or Lowell in that time. Thinking about it now however, the last time I spoke to HSBC about the account must have been in late 2002/early 03 when I visited a branch and they told me the account had been closed and been passed to the their debt collectors. How do I check how long it has been?! My credit report states that Lowell issued the default in 2004..

 

In regards to the debt being an overdraft, apologises Rory but I got a bit lost in the legal stuf you mentioned! Should I still draft the letter using the standard template on this site?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, still draft the letter but it has to have been 6 years clear to the date since you made the last payment. the default date is irrelevant.

 

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does statute barred mean?

Once a debt is statute barred you have no legal obligation to pay it.
Thinking about it now however, the last time I spoke to HSBC about the account must have been in late 2002/early 03 when I visited a branch and they told me the account had been closed and been passed to the their debt collectors.
This does not constitute acknowledgement.
How do I check how long it has been?! My credit report states that Lowell issued the default in 2004..

Send template M from here You'll need to modify it a bit to suit your circumstances.
In regards to the debt being an overdraft, apologises Rory but I got a bit lost in the legal stuf you mentioned! Should I still draft the letter using the standard template on this site?

It doesn't really cover overdrafts as they have an exemption. The copy of the agreement for overdrafts would just be a letter from the bank.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The emphasis is always on the creditor to prove that the account is not statute barred. London Congregation Union Inc v Harriss and Harriss [1988] 1 All ER 15, CA at 13.3)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Statute barred means that a debt is no longer legally collectable. As for the CCA letter, it is my belief that a bank overdraft is not covered by the same laws, so the letter would be meaningless.

 

However, I'm still learning here myself and I'm sure that Rory32 will give you a much better offering as to what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Statute barred means that it is no longer enforceable.

A better explanation as to statute barred can be found here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/146530-have-you-received-threatening.html?highlig

 

Edited as Rory was much faster at typing and finding links for you than I was, :)

If you follow this link then you will see if gives you info on what action to take against lowells, how ever before following the link do send the statute barred letter 'M' first so you can find out if it is definately satute barred.

I'm sure it is but just wait for there reply. They could come back with utter rubbish to try and convince you that is is not statute barred in that case if you are unsure post there reply on here. I doubt they have any true evidence in there favour. You seem to know what action was taken during the six year period.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the rather late default placed on you file the following may be of interest (particularly point 11) http://www.experian.co.uk/www/pages/downloads/compliance/guidance_on_defaults.pdf

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you to all your replies, very informative indeed. I see in hindsight I should not have started repayments back in August of last year but instead tried to find out if the debt was statute barred.

 

Regarding letter 'M' in the templates, given the fact that I have indeed been making payments, 11 now all together I believe, will this not remove the statute bar from the debt as I have acknowledged it and begun repayments?

 

Very interesting link on the experian site Rory. Point 11 seems to state lenders are only allowed to file a default notice once payments have been missed for more than 6 months. However I couldn't quite see anything that says the default must be filed within a certain time frame...unless I'm reading it wrong?

 

I'm still not quite sure where to go from here. All advice is greatly apprecaited.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding letter 'M' in the templates, given the fact that I have indeed been making payments, 11 now all together I believe, will this not remove the statute bar from the debt as I have acknowledged it and begun repayments?

 

Debts can not become unstatute barred. Once the debt is statute barred it will always remain so.

 

Regarding the default I would initially complain to the ICO about the default years later. This won't necessarily remove the default but it will start the ball rolling in the right direction.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. So am I right in assuming my only way forward from here is to try and see if the debt is indeed statute barred? If not then I presume I'm just going to have to pay it off...grr

 

I think the letter below should do the trick, without the bit in red?

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

We would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

We would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter above you will have to modify due to the circumstances of the account. If you need help with this let us know.

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. Let me have a think about it as it is rather late now and I'll post tomorrow if no one beats me to it.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell Finance Ltd.

PO Box 172

Leeds

LS11 9WS

 

This add. worked fine for me back in April, Yes its the po.box add, its what was on the letters I received from them.

I normally use the add. that is on the mail that I've received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

Letter M, link posted earlier in this thread.

i would send that but amend it to suit your circumstances.

You need to leave out the part which says that no payments have been made in the past 6 yrs, just add that the debt was statute barred when you started making the payments and you only made them as you didn't know what else to do and were worried etc. You have since found out about the statute barred Reg's. once statute barred it cannot become un-statute barred, even though you had started paying it was after the 6 years of no contact. add bits like that.

If you are sure of your dates I wouldn't worry too much as they are not aloud to even ask you for the money.

I know you are concerned about the default. If you do a search there are threads on here regarding getting defaults removed from credit files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grrr..just been speaking to the people at Lowell and they've refused to remove the default notice placed on my report in 2004 even if I settle the account with them. Their excuse was it is against the law and Data Protection blah blah, all they can do is tell experian to mark the debt as 'settled'. So frustrating! How does having a default marked as 'settled' affect your report in comparison to having it outstanding? I'm trying to apply for a loan but am getting nowhere with this thing on my report!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...