Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Annalh v Egg/DLA/Eversheds ** Judgement given by court **


ANNALH
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I submitted a Data Protection Act request to both to which they didnt respond, so submitted an N1 form today for non-compliance.

 

Also wrote to DLA demanding a copy of the credit agreement, notice of assignment and any default notice etc, and denying any liability for the debt.

 

Just got to wait now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Egg did not supply the credit agreement within 30 days so i reported them to TS and wrote back saying i do not acknowledge any debt and want all monies paid returned to me etc. I sent this off by recorded del. yesterday.

 

Guess what i get in the post today.....the agreement and full statement of account!

It was dated the 11th which was the 32nd day! what do i do now? they were outside the 30 days so they committed an offence and they still havent provided a copy of the default notice (there is no default registered on any of my credit reports-the account isnt even on there. The loan was taken out in 1999 but they say there was a default notice produced in 2001) Am i right in thinking theres nothing i can do because they supplied the agreement eventually??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just checked my credit report and my Egg account is now on there - it never was before and the loan was taken out in 1999.

 

Problem is they have also shown the default. Egg failed to provide a copy of the default notice within 30 days but provided the agreement. I filed a notice of dispute with equifax to tell them to take it off because they cannot prove a default notice was sent (apparently it was sent in 2001).

Can they put the account and default on my credit report after all this time?

The way it looks is that the default was registered at my current address, which it wasnt but when i look at my score it says 'you have one default registered at your current address'.

 

What should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default will be with you so will move with address.

 

With my Amex account I wrote and asked for copy of default notice. To be honest their reply dropped them in it. i.e. they admitted it wasn't issued.

 

Write and say (if you didn't receive a letter advising they wanted their money back or else they would cancel the account ) you did not receive a copy of the default notice as required under section 88 of the CCA. If they cannot supply it then ask them to remove the notice forthwith or you will seek damages resulting from the use of incorrect information. You won't get much out of credit reference agencies. They just ask Egg if Egg say it's correct they believe them. I wrote to one credit reference agency and suggested that as Amex had admitted they (or in your case could prove) they had issued a default notice then it can be assumed the credit file is misleading, which means they have a legal duty under the DPA to remove it.

 

Hope that helps.

 

:)

Egg Data Protection Act Statements arrived. On hold.

 

Halifax - Moneyclaim £3100

 

Amex to Remove Default - acknowledged didn't issue correct documents - default removed :) . £135 paid in full without Court

 

I'm on a roll now :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the date of the default notice? Is it now or is it 2001?

If it is now then should ascertain whether this means that it will run 6 yrs from now. Does it give any other details - the date of the actual default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I think i have confused Egg's solicitors - DLA.

 

They have got 2 letters i sent them as follows;

 

1. Says you are in breach of cca and committed criminal offence etc for not supplying data within 30 days (it arrived on day 32). So therefore I do not acknowledge the debt and request repayment of all monies taken by yourselves etc etc.

 

2. Says most of the balance is made up of charges therefore please deduct a total of £x as this represents unlawful charges etc etc and i will settle the balance.

 

They say they are happy to refund any 'unfair' charges per my letter 2.

But they are confused by letter 1. as they have now provided the data.

What do i tell them??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would report them to trading standards for failure to comply with the cca, 32 days is not complying.

 

I dont think this helps you really, but it might make you feel better.

 

I would write back and insist they send the copy of the defualt notice, i think the request is for a 'true copy'. You dont want a photcopy that you cant read, id check this up to make sure you ask for the right thing.

 

their reassurance is not cokmplying with your right to see the default notice i believe.

 

I hope that BF or somoene else with more knowledge posts back onthis issue but i think they have to supply the default notice copy under the CCA.

 

JMHO

 

GLenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading Standards said there is not a case for prosecution.

 

Egg have said they will refund my charges to my account but cant remove the default, I said as Ive already filed the claim online i told them they now owe me more than i owe them and any settlement offer must include removal of default.

 

Found out today, claim issued on 29th August and they acknowledged it on 2nd September - QUICK WORK!

 

Their solicitor decided to email me a copy of the default notice on 1st September that was faxed to them by Egg, funny how they have been able to find it now eh? I don't know whether to believe this is a copy of the original because I don't know if we ever had one sent.

 

This default is really affecting my family as every time my credit file is checked it comes up, even when we move house (we rent at the moment) even the rental companies look down on me because of this. We want to get a mortgage in a couple of months but dont think we have a cat in h**ls chance to be honest. Its so frustrating because I was in a completely different financial situation all those years ago but it still haunts me and I can't move on.

 

I REALLY WANT THIS DEFAULT REMOVED.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone tell me why you think they acknowledged the claim so quickly??

 

As they have said they are prepared to refund the charges (just that they didnt meet my deadline so now i have claimed +interest and costs)

I dont want this dragging on for months because i NEED TO GET THIS DEFAULT REMOVED.

Should I make them an offer along the lines of...

"I will forget the interest and costs if you agree to show the account as settled and remove the default?"

 

ANYONE?? PLEASE??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ANNALH- I am in a similar position as you! but with Morgan Stanley Bank who registered a Default against me - even though I had issued them with a statutory Notice Pursuant to Section 10 of the Data Protection Act 1998! I have also requested a copy of my original Credit Card Agreement, which has not been provided. Re: The Default, go to the Forum Litigation Section on 'How to get a Default removed'. In fact that is exactly where I am going to look now!!! I totally agree with your thoughts - quote "this default is really affecting me and my family, as every time my credit file is checked it (the default) comes up. Even when we move house and even the rental companies look down on me because of this" "Its so frustrating because I was in a completely financial situation....., but it still haunts me and I can't move on" I understand your thoughts completely ANNALH & Ditto!.......My advice would be, do not Cave-In! Go for Egg and demand that the Default be Removed. Pleassssseee, do not even consider forgetting the interest & costs, why should You??? Hey ANNALH, please do not accept Egg's Bullying tactics..............I HATE BULLIES. Keep the Faith and LOVE from Angry Cat Please be aware, that I am simply a member of the BAG/CAG and the above, is simply JMHO (just my honest opinion) :) AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Had letter from DLA today (thought egg were dealing with in house now??)

They are threatening to take me to court if i dont pay the balance outstanding, which they say is £3599!!! Funny because they sent me a statement of account last month saying it is £2114.

Anyway I got on the phone to Brian Gibson their legal exec and he apologised profusely and said it was a mistake and i should talk to egg about the matter in future.

I am still waiting to see if they settle because the amount i am claiming is more than what i owe them because the balance of £2114 is made up of charges.

I havent heard from them for awhile. Hope they decide to settle before the hearing.

They already agreed to refund the charges when DLA were dealing with it but now it includes interest they dont want to know.

I wish they'd make up their minds and stop confusing me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also had a letter from Egg regarding my LBA i sent to try to get the default removed.

I said if they didnt remove it i would seek financial compensation for the increased interest rates i have had to pay as a result of this default.

I need to work out how much that is now. Can anyone help me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ANNALH, no expert but a default only stays on your credit file for 6 years. If it was issued as you say on 28.03.01. It will be off next April 2007. Fight them by all means but hang on for the mortgage as you should be ok.

 

By the way forgetting all that I hope you get as much as you can as all the banks I have had to deal with these have been quite frankly the nastiest. I would imagine it has something to do with their profits. Not exactly coining it are you?

 

Sorry. Mini rant over! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The deadline for filing all documents with the court was yesterday so i gave them full details of the claim with a list of charges added to my loan account and the reasons why i think they are unlawful as they had asked for.

I said the charges were a penalty, there was no clear structure for charging and with charges up to £435 per day i did not think that was fair in relation to the amount i was in arrears.

plus they had already offered to refund the charges until i filed a court claim.

plus they then changed their tune and said they could find no evidence of charges being added????

 

every trick in the book eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Im still waiting for a court date. The court has taken longer with this one than all my others, they keep asking for info too so im hoping egg will make an offer as it looks like the courts are giving my case a lot of thought.

 

I think this is because Egg have already offered to settle in full prior to court action but they replied after i had submitted a claim online (they waited until after my deadline). Well tough luck Egg you shouldnt have been trying to play me.

 

I have provided a copy of Egg's correspondence to the court where they offered full settlement, and the subsequent correspondence where they changed their minds for no apparent reason other than they dont want to pay the interest and court fees that have now been added. We can see through you Egg and so can the court!! haha

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just see dla's letters as another attempt to put me off. I have gathered a lot of case info and other info to back up my claim and I am fully prepared for my hearing - I just wish the court would hurry up and set a date!

 

See you in court EGG!!!!! Looking forward to it. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Here are some of the points I intend to bring to the courts attention regardin my claim;

 

1. There was no clear structure for charging and with charges up to £435 per day i did not think that was fair in relation to the amount i was in arrears.

 

2. Egg have already offered to settle in full prior to court action but they replied after i had submitted a claim online (they waited until after my deadline).

Now they are refusing to settle (presumably because they don’t want to pay the additional interest and costs!

I have provided a copy of Egg's correspondence to the court where they offered full settlement, and the subsequent correspondence where they changed their minds for no apparent reason.

 

 

3. Egg then changed their tune and said they could find no evidence of charges being added????

 

4. Egg didn’t put the default on my credit file until I took court action against them, therefore they stopped processing my data and then restarted (without my permission) as revenge for my suing them. This is unlawful as the agreement had ended and therefore my permission to continue processing my data had ended.

 

5. DLA clearly have got their records in a right mess as I had letter from DLA today saying they are threatening to take me to court if i dont pay the balance outstanding, which they say is £3599!!! Funny because they sent me a statement of account last month saying it is £2114.

Anyway I got on the phone to Brian Gibson their legal exec and he apologised profusely and said it was a mistake and i should talk to egg about the matter in future. I think they are trying to scare/confuse me into paying the balance outstanding which I may point out is made up of the unlawful charges I am reclaiming!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

hi annalh i to was told early feb that the solicitors are now eversheds and i have also had an offer and tomlin order, i wrote back saying no and wrote the conditions down that i would settle out of court ie no confidentiality clauses and a letter from egg saying they will remove default and for the full amount in way of personal cheque.

i think they have appointed eversheds on the instructions to get rid of us long time claimers, not long now for full settlements.

all the best CB

SETTLED CASES

LTSB (CC) £20 21-8-06

HSBC (CC) £600 19-10-06

HSBC (Ac) No.1 £1900 25-10-06

RBS (CC) £900 25-10-06

Smile (Ac) £1300 17-11-06

A&L (Ac) No.1 £400 23-11-06

A&L (Mortgage ERC) £3900 4-12-06

LTSB (Ac) £200 13-12-06

A&L (Ac) No.2 £120 19-12-06

HSBC (Ac) No.2 £650 29-12-06

LTSB (Business) £1700 13-2-07

RBS (Ac) £4500 + Default Removal 17-3-07

Barclays (Bus) Warrant of Execution 10-3-07 not used yet

ONGOING CASES

Egg (CC) N1 Filed £1300 + Default Removal Judgment Order 9/1/07 In my Favour

Barclays Business loan & 2 accs. S.A.R N1 filed Judgment in Default isued 15/2/07

HSBC (CC) have failed to produce Credit Agreement

TO DO CASES

Egg (Loan)

LTSB (Ac Ltd Company)

LTSB (Loan)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...