Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Does anyone know if this is a valid CCA?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5685 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am absolutely sick and tired of being hounded by DCA's etc (as everyone else here is). After numerous CCA requests to numerous DCA's, I received this from HBOS.

 

http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u7/PossVox/HBOSCCA2001.jpg

 

 

http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u7/PossVox/HBOSCCA20012.jpg

 

Can someone please tell me if this is a valid CCA (it's a loan, not a CC). If it is valid - what do I do now?

 

Any advice, much appreciated.

:o You can't give a baby booze! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi G&M,

 

I'll ask a member of the Site Team to stop by, take a look and advise you on this.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid it is perfectly valid - as far as I can see it is properly executed and it certainly is enforceable as it has your signature and the prescribed terms.

 

If you are not doing so already, keep a detailed record of all correspondence and phone calls. However, do not talk to them on the phone but insist they only correspond in writing - that is your right

Edited by steven4064

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should make up and inc/exp sheet and send it along with a proposal of payment inluding the first payment. Then keep to what you have offered unless you are in a position to make a full and final settlement

 

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if they are phoning you I would send them the telephone harassment letter http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/37006-harassment-telephone-response-letter.html although I prefer a somewhat more strongly worded version:

Your address

Their address

HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company. I am keeping a record of the calls that I get and they average x calls per week, sometimes as many as x calls a day. Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

I have requested that these calls stop [on the phone][in writing], but I am still receiving calls. (change or delete as necessary)

 

I assert my right that all further correspondence from your company should be made in writing only.

 

I would like to point out that your behaviour constitutes harassment under ss1&2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 –

 

1 Prohibition of harassment

(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct—

(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

(2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other…

 

2 Offence of harassment

(1) A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.

(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both...

 

Further, this behaviour is also an offence under s127(2)© of the Communications 2003 –

127 Improper use of public electronic communications network

 

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—

© persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.

(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both...

 

I am writing to you to impress on you the seriousness of your actions, since your call centre staff are obviously ignorant in this respect.

 

If I receive any further calls, I will give the facts to the local police, naming the name of company’s employee(s) involved and any senior managers I deem to be responsible, and I will press for the full penalties under the Acts quoted.

 

I also reserve the right to civil remedy under s3 of the Protection from Harassment Act and also enforcement action under s4 of that Act and s129 of the Communications Act via OFCOM.

 

Please do not phone concerning this matter. If you need to communicate with me, write to the above address.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

[NAME HERE]

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid it is perfectly valid - as far as I can see it is properly executed and it certainly is enforceable as it has your signature and the prescribed terms.

 

I concur Steven. All of the prescribed terms are there and it complies with 2(1) of the Copies of Doc's Reg's 1983..

 

Although i'm not sure of its relevance in this case, I can't see the right to cancel anywhere on the document.

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave

 

On the second page it has 'Read this Carefully - Your Rights' This and what follows is a valid 'disclaimer' from Item 14 (or possibly 16) of Part I of Schedule 2 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 instead of 'Your Right To Cancel' as this, presumably, is an agreement falling under s12(b) of the CCA 1974.

 

Although it seems it should actually say "Read this carefully to find out about your rights"

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi G&M,

 

The other aspect to consider is whether any unlawful charges have added to the a/c when you had late or missed pay'ts. If so, you could reclaim them to reduce the debt.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi - thanks for your replies. I was going to take your advice, but shortly after, I received a letter from Robinson Way chasing payment, so I CCA'd them. During this time, I received a letter from HBOS, enclosing my account details and a CCA. They told me that Robinson Way were now dealing with my account and I should make my payment to them. Given that I was still waiting for my CCA from Robinson Way, I did nothing. Since then, I have received a 'Telemessage', a snotty letter demanding payment and today, a FINAL NOTICE letter on red paper - ALL FROM WESCOT!!!

I am becoming more confused by the minute and the words 'right hand, left hand' spring to mind. I do realise I may have to concede and pay, but if I do, I will contest the PPI added, which cost more than half the amount of the loan. I know my debt is small and I know I've been naiive, but one way or another, I WILL have the last laugh over these people.

I wouldn't mind, but the loan was with britannia - as was my mortgage. When I moved, I obviously had to tell britannia too. That was 4 years ago. Have I ever heard from britannia about my debt? No!!!

:o You can't give a baby booze! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are passing it round like this, there is something else you can do. There are 2 ways in which another company can get involved:

 

1. They act on behalf of the original creditor as an agent - you still owe the original creditor and the original creditor only can take you to court

 

2. they 'buy' the debt from the original creditor and they then become the creditor and can take you to court in their own name

 

In case 2, you must have been sent a Notice of assignment by Special delivery or the new creditor has no right to collect - sections 136 and 196 of the Law of Property Act 1925 - so, if you think this applies, ask them to prove they sent a NoA if they take you to court

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply steven.. I've checked the 'red letter' from wescot and they say they that their 'client' is Bank of Scotland, so I'm guessing option 2 is a no - no. However, I haven't had any correspondence from (H)BOS saying that they'll take me to court either. Should i sit tight and hunt around on the PPI section on CAG just in case I have to pay?

:o You can't give a baby booze! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know - that's what I thought, but apparently it has all the correct prescribed terms, so it is valid:(

I now think that my only chances are contesting the interest charges and/or the ppi charges, which are on the cca. Obviously, before I can even consider how to do that, I need to be certain where I stand now. If I try and challenge anything else at the mo' I will be admitting the debt. Then they'll be no going back!!

:o You can't give a baby booze! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't say earlier if you've suffered any penalty charges on the a/c.

 

These could be reclaimed to reduce the debt which you owe.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, yes they have added a few charges here and there - it adds up to just over £86.00. I'm totally against this principle, but judging by other people's posts, I've got off very lightly. I doubt a judge would regard my charges as excessive. Every penny helps though...

:o You can't give a baby booze! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis are you going to claim PPI? On the charges, 86p is excessive if it is more than their actual costs.

 

Just to confirm, whatever it says in the declaration, the agreement in post #1 is enforceable.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still trying to find out what I can do re PPI, but basically the amount of the loan was £1000. The cost of the PPI (Creditcare silver) is £529 - over half the amount borrowed in the first place. I can't recall exactly where I heard it, but if the amount is disproportionate to the loan (I think so), then they're on dodgy ground. It's something to do with the interest rates too I think.

You see now why I'm doing my ppi homework as fast as I can?!

:o You can't give a baby booze! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

These charges should be reclaimed NOW to reduce the debt and to put the a/c formally "In Dispute".

 

Have a read of the Guide to Reclaiming at Link No1 in my signature below.

 

Keep this entirely separate from claiming PPI which you can pursue on the PPI section of the forum.

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll get your account charges refunded as they are unlawful penalties.

 

Simple as that. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had another look at a snotty letter that I recieved from HBOS last month. I'm not sure about these bits:

'When your account is in arrears it is passed to our collections department. At this point they will try and contact you either by telephone and letter to advise you of the status of your account and to prompt a suitable repayment agreement to be arranged'

 

I've never had any such communication as mentioned above. I am certain they have written to my old address, DESPITE what I mentioned in #10 in this thread.

 

'However, once 7 months arrears have accrued the account will be defaulted and passed to our recovery agents, Blair, Oliver & Scott...'

According to the statement of payments made, my first payment to blair,oliver,scott was November '06. i stopped paying the original creditor in July - that's 4 months (I know for a fact they first contacted me earlier, but I may not have kept the letter).

 

Would it be worth my while writing to HBOS (or even Britannia), asking for copies of these letters they say they sent to me - and could they confirm the address they initially wrote to. Or, should I write to HBOS that July - November is 4 months, NOT 7?

:o You can't give a baby booze! :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing

LOWELLS-Stat Demand Set Aside-No CCA & Statute Barred-£1800-Gone Away-April 2008

 

Scotcall on behalf of Cabot-£2200-no CCA returned to Cabot-file closed-March 2009

 

Cabot-Court Claim issued despite no CCA and Stat Barred-Claim discontinued-March 2009

__________________________________________

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi G&M,

 

I don't think it's worth querying whether they should have instructed Blair, Scott Oliver after 4 or 7 months - the a/c was in arrears so they have the right to pursue for payment.

 

I assume they have your correct address now.

 

Get on with quantifying the penalty charges which you can reclaim.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...