Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Djokovic is back in the news - the BBC has cast doubts on the date of his covid test prior to arriving in Australia. They've done some clever research with serial numbers and QR codes but the Serbian public health authority isn't giving information.   And Nadal is a step closer to his 21st Grand Slam title, which would make him the first male player to reach that. He won't be able to compete in the French Open under France's current rules which require all sportspeople to be vaxxed.   Novak Djokovic: Doubts over timing of Covid test WWW.BBC.COM The BBC has uncovered fresh evidence questioning the timing of Novak Djokovic’s positive Covid test used to enter Australia.  
    • Hi   I could be wrong here so could @namedisplay please clarify if I am correct or completely wrong?   In your post#1 you mention that due to your health issues and your mental state at the time you rang the Training Room and was told it would cost and initial £200 and then £15 per month until you finished the course.   Then further in post#1 The Training Room told you you were not eligible for an extension because you hadn't completed enough of the course.   With the above I now refer Post#12 which mentions your circumstances are covered by 13 in the TTR Terms and Conditions.   What is mentioned above seems conflicting from TTR for the following:   1. IMO that money of £200 and then £15 per month (on top of original Course Fees) was them at that time agreeing to an extension as per 13 in TTR Terms and Conditions   2. Them stating you can't extend Course as not completed enough of Course is not in TTR Terms and Conditions (that I and others can see) (Note they could be referring to 15 in TTR Terms and Conditions)   Can you clarify the above and were you informed those extra costs were due to an extension of your Course.   Again I will ask did you provide the Training Room with Medical Evidence when you asked the above?   We also still need to see the Letter from Training Room Threatening Legal Action (fully redacted) which you still haven't posted?   You need to send The Training Room a Subject Access Request (SAR) asking for 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase means whatever format they hold that data in whether it be written, email, recorded phone calls etc.   They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond to your SAR Request and that Time Limit only starts once they have acknowledged your SAR Request. They can extend that Time Limit if they need to prove identity before actioning the SAR Request so be aware of that.   A SAR Request is now FREE and make sure you get Free Proof of Posting from the Post Office     Your right of access ICO.ORG.UK   Can you please make sure you answer the questions asked of Caggers to assist you    
    • I've been trying to resolve a issue with 8 PCN issued by Tyne Tunnel 2 (tt2.co.uk). Tyne Tunnel 2 is a gated toll charged tunnel to cross the River Tyne in Newcastle. We moved in recently so all a bit new to us. My dad had been using the tunnel about twice a week and he had been paying cash for the toll fee at the booths. At some point in November 2021 they had done some constructions where the gates had been closed and payments had transitioned to online methods. My dad had been oblivious to this and been on his merry way multiple times thinking that he doesn't need to pay. So he received the first PCN some where end of November which had been issue on the 26th after which point I went on alert and sorted out the online accounts and such. However the current total of fines has amounted to £255.20 and I have appealed explaining that soon as the letters were received we have resolved the issue but they insist on us paying 8 PCN. I feel it's unfair that the fine is for the same offence which we couldn't have rectified or known until we received the first PCN letter and after the first PCN we have rectified it so feel they are being bit draconic. Any advice on this matter? 
    • No need to apologise! I am extremely grateful for both your help   Gosh very good attention to detail going on here   Great thank you, i will put them back as below   Good evening to you   DEFENCE   1.     The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.     2.     Paragraph 1 is noted. It is accepted I have in the past had agreements with Lloyds TSB. I do not recall the precise details or agreement nor the claimant either, having failed to provide an agreement/account number within its particulars of claim and have therefore sought verification from the claimant.   3.     Paragraph 2 is noted but until such time the claimant can clarify the agreement account number any breach has yet to be proven.      4.     I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served by either the Claimant or Lloyds TSB pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.   5. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any Notice of default served.   6.     It is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of the Agreement/Assignment/Default notice or Termination requested by CPR 31. 14.    Therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement ; and b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and c) Show or evidence a Default Notice /Notice of Sums in Arrears, d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;   7.     As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.   8.     On the 5th of January 2022 I requested to The Claimants Solicitors, Mortimer Clarke by way of a CPR 31.14 copies of the documents referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. Mortimer Clarke have failed to fulfil my CPR 31:14 request.   9.     On the 5th of January 2022 I made a section 78 legal request to the claimant for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement. The claimant has as of 27/01/22 failed to comply.   10.  By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Full & Final Settlement HSBC


Dangermouse
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4944 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Castlelbest

 

Herewith is text of letter from HSBC, we only accepted because we were short of cash for christmas. It doesn't say full & final, does that mean that we can still go for the rest when the OFT case concludes?

 

Thx

 

Dangermouse

 

I had trouble pasting the scan...se here is the text.

 

 

Acceptance Form

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer Name

 

Account Number

 

Address

 

 

 

 

*I/We accept a sum of £xxxxx in settlement of my/our claim against the bank.

 

I/We are aware that the bank will credit my/our above account once they have received this signed acceptance and that this will be carried out within 14 days following receipt.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signed Date

HSBC Bank Plc

Arlington Business Centre etc. etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If thats the complete wording there is technically nothing to stop you claiming again.

 

Normally the acceptance letter says something like;

 

I accept the sum of £ xxxx.xx in full and final settlement of my claim against HSBC for charges applied to my account in the period from xx/xx/xx to xx/xx/xx. I agree not to make any other claims relating to charges for the period stipulated above.

 

as yours doesn't say that then try for the balance :)

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey ..Dangermouse congratulations on a settlement..but I have not seen the previous info ..why did they settle when everything is on hold ? What were you claiming ? ...do you have a link to a threat of your own?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hsbc can be like that. my first claim was settled without a fight. i am currently in the process of claim 2, however they have resisted so far and i am having to go to the court route, and highlight the unfair financial hardship a stay will cause in my case.

 

i thought this time, it might also be effected because i am investigating claiming for damages in addition to the charges. maybe because of the credit crunch, the true cost and effect is more apparent. as i have also suffered serious ill health from the stress of dealing with this (not to mention the numerous arguents at home and work), my gp wants to sign me off work with stress etc. all because of the mess the charges got me in.

 

by the way, if there are any lawyers out there who can help, i'd love to hear from you. i hope that a final decision will be made, and i can force the court to judge on the charges... a victory for everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya TLG, unfortunatly thats exactly why the court will stay any action like this including cases of hardship.

The high court case is there in theory to resolve all of these arguments, they will stay anything along those lines until the legal issues have been clarified in the test case.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Castleguy

 

I have heard of people who have still continued to be successful despite the court case. one lady told me a lot about her case, she was using an online service (not this web site i dont think) and he advised her to fill out this form, then put together a letter saying the stay should be lifted.

 

i remember something in her email about some courts still processing cases regardless.

 

is this information wrong? she did ok, got about £3500 from hsbc

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry meant to include, the letter he drafted for her was detailing hardship. unfortunately, he either has a letter for people to do it themselves, or in my friends case he did charge 10% of the amount for doing it, which i think she went for because of the court case thing, so i dont want to use him if i can help it (even his email said 'i can't do anything you can't do for yourself')... i guess you are paying for convenience though. mind, i did see some people charge up to 40% which i thought was mad

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

Sorry for late reply but have not looked at thread for a while.

 

I just got the offer in the post before Christmas, I had no even issued proceedings at that stage. Just put in a claim.

 

I was surprised when it arrived because of the court hold on these cases.

 

Regards

 

Dangermouse

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...