Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BCW & Cat debt


purp751
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

help,

 

I had a catalogue, which due to their messing up when things should be put on the account (on get them now and add 6 months later)

the payments ended up going over what could afford, it wouldn't have happened if they'd got it right,

 

after talking with them we agreed on a monthly payment sum which was paying.

 

Now it seems the catalogue has sold the debt on,

 

firstly to phoenix who have never contacted me,

and now onto buchanan clark + wells who have stated that phoenix have contacted

and there's 'no legitimate reason for non-payment' of course there is,

I didn't even know it had gone,

needless to say payments have been cancelled to the catalogue.

 

now this debt is £691,

from what have heard phoenix add massive interest charges onto accounts they buy

so can only assume that's the reason it's gone up so much too,

 

am worried they're going to get 'heavy' and want the full cash which I don't have,

 

I was happy paying the instalments to pay it off,

how do I go about this,

 

help,

 

I thought it was sorted and was being paid off!

 

another annoying factor is they haven't even sent this letter to me as married name

(and it was married name with the catalogue too!),

and have sent it to my maiden name!:mad:

 

can anyone help draft a letter which says I was paying this,

am annoyed at what they've all done,

 

phoenix have NEVER been in contact with me (so that throws out this no reason for not paying as didn't even know!!),

and that the instalments will have to continue as I don't have the money to pay it off in one lump sum

which their letter threatens that if don't court action will happen?!

 

thank you in advance, feel sick with worry and have visions of them knocking on the door getting forceful! :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Relax - they may huff and puff but they cannot blow your house down! In fact you decide how this is going to be paid, not them.

 

Send them a "prove it" letter ie they have got to prove they have a legitimate right to collect this debt as this is the first you have heard of it and they haven't even got your name right!

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Your ref:

 

Your company has contacted me regarding an account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself to Phoenix.

 

I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to Phoenix and in the absence of proof of the alleged debt both Phoenix and Buchanan Clark and Wells are in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 for processing information about me without my permission.

 

I require Phoenix to prove that this alleged debt exists and is owed by me to them. I also require a copy of any Notice Of Assignment informing me that the alleged debt has been assigned to Phoenix as required by the Law of Property Act 1925 Section 136. I have no knowledge of any such Notice of Assignment having been issued.

 

Under the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it has not been proved that they are the debtor in question.

 

OFT Guidance also states that it is unfair to pursue individuals for payment when they are not liable. It is also a breach of the Guidance to use unfair/deceptive means to try to collect payment on a debt when it has not been proved that the debt is owed by the person being pursued.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above alleged debt unless you can provide evidence as to the alleged debt’s existence and my liability for it.

 

All correspondence MUST be in writing. BE AWARE THAT ALL PHONE CALLS ARE RECORDED and recordings will be transmitted to the OFT and used in court if necessary.

 

I trust this makes my position clear. If there is anything about this letter you do not understand, I suggest you take legal advice.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Don't speak to them on the phone - ever- they will only bully you into paying what you cannot afford - that is Golden Rule No1. If they call, don't answer or hang up.

 

Once you have your reply to that, you can get more advice about what to do next. Don't worry about anyone coming to the door. No one can do that without your permission and you can ask them to leave or you will call the police as they are trespassing. If the paper work eventually proves to be in order, you only need offer them what you can afford and they would look pretty silly taking you to court because no court would order you to pay more than you can afford. This "prove it " letter is only the first step - there's more! Welcome to CAG - you are on your way to taking charge.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, feel can breathe a bit easier with that, will get it sent off recorded delivery to them asap and follow up. great forum, definately worth donations to keep running for sure!!

 

what does 'subscribing' mean babybear39? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

it just means we are keeping an eye on your thread and we are willing to help out as and when necessary.

 

we normally do this buy adding a post, like i have, or buy near the top of the page clicking on thread links and clicking subscribe to this thread. Either way next time someone posts it will show up under our subscribed threads in the quick links section.

 

If you need anythink i am also here to help as i love doing battle with catalogues.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok I've had a reply, not quite what expected, a final notice stating that since I have failed to notify them of any legitimate reason for non-payment that they can only assume I don't wish to settle the matter amicably, there is no mention of the letter above that I sent to them, nor any confirmation of what this debt is, they did sign for the recorded delivery letter so KNOW they got it (printed off the signed slip as proof they did), so now what do I do, they said they want payment immediately or else?

 

they've totally ignored the letter asking what this debt is, it's origins and what it's for? :-(

 

what do I do now :(:| this is a copy of their letter bwlow:

 

 

 

We refer to previous correspondence regarding our clients Pheonix Recoveries (UK) Limited S.a.r.l and regret to note that your debt, in the sum of £691.83 remains outstanding.

 

Since you have failed to notify us of any legitimate reason for non-payment we can only assume that you do not wish to settle this manner amicably.

 

Accordingly, this letter should be accepted as Final Notice that unless payment is made immediately, we shall seek to commence Legal Proceedings against you, with payment of Interest and Costs in addition to the Principal Sum being sought.

 

You can contact our 24 Hour Payment Line on 0871 700 1524 to make immediate payment by Credit or Debit Card or to set up a Direct Debit Mandate. Payment is also accepted online at thier payment website

 

Should you wish to discuss your financial circumstances in relation to this debt, we would ask you contact us immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They would look pure eejits taking you to court on your maiden name when the account was in your married name! I would let them do that and let it cost them a packet - but that is not my advice to you! They have ignored your letter and the next stage is to ask the for a copy of the credit agreement. They must by law get one form the original creditor if they don't have one. They have 12 days (plus 2 for admin) to send it to you. If they haven't sent it in that time the account goes into dispute and you don't have to pay them another penny until such times as they have sent you a valid agreement. When you get it post it up here and we will have a look at it to see if it is valid. Here is the link for the letter you need to send:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

Scroll down to Letter N. Put " I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPNANY" at the top of the letter. Send them the £1 by postal order. Do not sign the letter but print your signature or put your initials and send by recorded delivery so you have proof they received it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to that you could also put.

 

"OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT"

 

That way they cant say we are acting on behalf of ......

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, another letter arrived after the one above with 'Choice' on it, that's all they've said about who they're acting on behalf of, I am aware I owe it and that isn't denied, am still a tad annoyed they can't get my name right though, so how do I proceed, with that letter or one stating I can't afford stupid amounts a month? which I can't, it's what caused all this in the first place! :mad:

 

how do you get them agree to a suitable amount a month, I really can't afford a lot, am sure though they won't accept £20 a month will they? but that's what could realistically afford without struggling to find it at the moment? :(

 

help, am now concerned they'll go to court and will end up with bailiff's or the like, probably over-reacting but never dealt with this type of thing before! :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can either challenge that they have any legal right to collect the debt at all - and if there is no credit agreement, they haven't - or if you want to make an arrangement, go to the letter templates I gave you the link for above and amongst the templates is a letter making an offer of payment. If they won't accept what you offer then tell them it is that or nothing at all. They may threaten court as a way of getting you to pay more - they are bullies of the worst kind - but any court will take a dim view of them starting proceedings where an offer of payment has been made. They may mump and moan about your offer but in the end they will accept it. Stop worrying about baillifs. They can only come if a court order is ignored and you are a long way from that stage yet. Stick to your offer and don't answer the phone if they ring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

u could send the prove it letter or just tell the the acc is in dispute with XX company and no payments will be made until the dispute is settled.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi that's great thank you, so they can't go for court action when receive this letter as they have to supply the CCA first, I'm printing off copies and keeping a file with everything in so can prove what they've sent and how I've replied to them too? :confused: I'll send that off first thing tomorrow because am sure this bill from my records has gone up by almost £300 with their 'costs' added on too! :mad:

 

it's reassuring to know they'll have to accept what offer a month so won't be struggling to pay what cannot afford which was my main worry thank you so much!

 

no doubts it's not over yet and am very grateful for your advice! top site, keep it up! :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not exactly true with the court action.

 

Under the rules of the CCA1974 if they can provide a CCA then they cant take any further enforcement action but as you will notice from the threads on here that companys only seem to remember the bits they want to and deny the rest of it exists.

 

Yes tehy can attempt to take court action but they will look very stupid wen you defende and counter claim against them as we are good at making ppl look stupid.

 

just because one thing says they cant do something it does not mean they wont try. They will even say we will produce a catalogue in court as everything u need is in there.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

purp, the situation is quite clear here. First thing I should add is DO NOT get stressed over any of these letters coming to you. It all feels VERY personal right? Wrong....

 

These are classed as threat-o-matics, letters than are computer generated and mass churned.

 

Did you send the prove it letter recorded (and NOT signed by you of course)?

 

If so, reference the date they signed for it against the date of the threat-o-matics, is there any cross over? If so, oh well its just bad timing.

 

If not, send them a letter like this:

 

Dear BCW,

Thanks you for you letters threatening legal action, they have been noted and kept for complete audit.

 

I am concerned with your conduct on this case. As member of the CSA, you will be aware of The Office of Fair Trading: Debt Collection Guidance Section 2.8, Subsection 'i' which clearly describes a deceptive and/or unfair method as:

"failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued"

I would also like to direct you to The Office of Fair Trading: Debt Collection Guidance Section 2.8, Subsection 'k' which clearly describes a deceptive and/or unfair method as:

"not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt."

I now have evidence that BCW has contravened this guidelines in at least two occasions despite the fact that I have already acknowledged NO liability to the sum outstanding. Please be aware that further contraventions will be reported to Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading.

I will refer you to my letter dated which was sent to your registered office recorded delivery via Royal Mail however in respect to clarity, I have attached said letter.

As requested, I require you to provide evidence as of my liability for the debt in question and if no such proof is provided, I require written confirmation that this account is closed

 

Yours Faithfully

 

Me

Edited by Captain Spaulding
  • Haha 1

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers BB, I've updated to take into account the OFT Guidelines rev 2006. Feel free to use/alter as you like

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks CS, yes you're right, it does feel personal, like someone's sitting at their desk deciding it's my turn this week, am more upset because wanted this sorting out with the company in the first place but they just sold it on rather than do that :(

 

I'll send that letter off tomorrow as well and let you know their response, shall I enclose a £1 postal order still for a CCA? :confused:

 

I sent it recorded yep, I printed off the signature of the person who signed for it off royal mail's online tracking service too so can prove they did receive it if they decide they didn't, I didn't sign the letter personally, I printed my initial and surname (my married one, the one they should have anyway), was that the right thing to do?

Edited by purp751
forgot extra bit!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome! Don't send the cheque, this is only a prove it letter not a CCA request!

 

Post back when they reply..... Oh n don't stress!

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

well this gets even better LOL received a letter this morning, sorry to your asking if the letters crossed they sent out the above one a week after they'd received mine (mine was signed for on the 26th June and theirs was dated 2nd July), so they should've responded better, anyway I received this letter this morning and now am unsure how to respond? :rolleyes:

 

Dear Miss Me (aghh...)

 

pursuer:phoenix

principal sum £691.83

 

Dear madam

 

I write with regard to your recent communication concerning the above account.

 

I can confirm that I have arranged for a copy of the invoice to be sent to you directly by our Clients. This will be with you as soon as possible.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact us....etc etc and they sign off.

 

 

soooooo do I now wait, an invoice still isn't a CCA is it, or do I do some kind of letter saying that while an invoice can be typed up by them...I want proper proof of what's been charged? also do I put on that I assume they'll be holding their actions until this has been sorted out satisfactorily, something that'll make them shiver...a lot! ;)

 

am starting to smile a little, it seems they're realising their bully tactics aren't working, tho I've no doubt if hadn't found here they probably would've, how many pay up purely based on their threatening manner I wonder...? :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly the same letter I got when I sent them a prove it letter. Now, just sit back and wait. You are correct, the term 'invoice' is misleading. Unless its a executed CCA then you're laughing!

 

Dont forget that the prove it letter is the start of the process, next steps are CCA's and statements, then you could go for SARs etc etc....

 

I learnt quickly that its one step at a time, you make your move then see how they try and counter it. Based on what they provide will create the strategy behind your next move ;)

 

The answer to your question on how many people put up with being bullied by these cowardly thugs - hundreds of thousands!

 

The tide has turned!

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi purp.

 

When u sent the prove it letter did u ask them to send a washing machine or even a cooker? If not then what is the invoice for?

 

Yes you just need to play the lovely waiting game which yes is very boring.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'invoice' bit is standard spew from these miscreants - whilst the logic of it remains unknown, ******* on their brigade seems great fun!

 

I'm also awaiting the 'invoice' (oh and the threat-o-matics have stopped), cant wait to get it as I think I will be quoting the limitations act :p

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have had plenty of dealings with DCAs to know they spout some strange stuff.

 

the many dealing i have had with SDFS regarding there CCAs is funny.

 

there is not many accs i have see that have a cca.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...