Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

About to ask for original signed loan documents


ads197
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5783 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello my first post!

 

I have read through some posts in here with regards to asking for the signed loan agreements and possible making the agreement, shall we say, null and void.

 

found a template letter and have adapted it very slightly mainly to read 'I' instead of 'We' etc

 

The loan i believe was taken out in 2001 when i was helping out a very ex girlfriend. 7 months ago the creditors contacted me with regards to making payments towards it etc etc I have been doing that at the rate of £150pcm and now they want to increase the payments which i have done for the next 6 months then they gonna want more of an increase..........like money does grow on trees!!

 

anyway after having had a look on here i have decided to send this letter;

 

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a signed copy of this credit agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of my credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

I understand a signed copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

I am doin this in the hope that they no longer have the original signed agreement.

Is this letter correct for what i need to find out? what would i do after 12 days? or, do i have to wait 30 days to take further action?

What would be my next course of action if they could not provide me with the signed agreement?

Is it likley they still have the original signed agreement after all this time??

would really just like some advice relating to my particular thread! please advise

thanks

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to cag :)

 

Its fine to amend template letters, infact the templates should be amended to suit each persons requirements :)

 

Who is the the original creditor?

 

After 12+2 days (this is to allow for delivery) if they havent produced a valid CCA then the debt becomes unenforcable.

 

Im not a debt expert so you might like to wait for someone more knowledgable to come along :)

 

 

saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

If youre looking for certainty with this, then i would suggest using a SAR along side the CCA request

 

the reason i suggest this approach is that creditors can hide behind the copy documents regulations to get out of providing the signed agreement while technically still complying with the provisions of the 1974 Act

 

if you SAR them as well asking specifically for the copy of the original agreement then you will know what they have, you can also ask for copies of the data within the statements so you can see what charges have been added

 

its quite difficult to say if they will still have the original or a copy of it as in some cases we have had copies of Barclaycard agreements from 1985 turn up on the other hand there have been cases where as late as 2005 where the lender has destroyed the agreement

 

i hope this helps

 

Regards

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

so after 14 days the debt is unenforceable............i could do with a postal strike!! lol

 

the creditor is RBS

 

wheres the more knowledgable people then ha ha, just want some advice on my case as apposed to everyone elses on here as they are all slightly different. is it worth me trying to mae the debt unenforceable?

 

am i right in thinking the debt will remain on my credit file but RBS couldnt make me pay it? for how long would it stay on my accont as an uneforeceable debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so after 14 days the debt is unenforceable............i could do with a postal strike!! lol For a CCA request its 12 Working days that the creditor has to comply, then the debt is in default, which means the creditor cannot enforce the agreement until they supply a copy of it to you (basically)

 

the creditor is RBS Oooo thats good , they were pretty woeful at document retention

 

wheres the more knowledgable people then ha ha, just want some advice on my case as apposed to everyone elses on here as they are all slightly different. is it worth me trying to mae the debt unenforceable? Thats your choice and only a decision that you can make, however if you dont ask you never know do you

 

am i right in thinking the debt will remain on my credit file but RBS couldnt make me pay it? for how long would it stay on my accont as an uneforeceable debt?

Wiuth regards to your credit file, it is possible to remove any adverse data from your file, however , there are many routes you can take to do this

 

its best to take one step at a time

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you mr/mrs pt person, ill sort out the SAR thing too, best to send it at the same time is it (same envelope)? i would sooooooo love to not have to pay 175 pcm to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you mr/mrs pt person, ill sort out the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) thing too, best to send it at the same time is it (same envelope)? i would sooooooo love to not have to pay 175 pcm to them

i would send them seperatley

 

can i ask what the problem is here? as the creditors causing you problems or acting unreasonably or are you just looking to cease paying them ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they want an increase ev 6 months or r threatening court action etc etc so i thought stuff it the debt is over 6 yers old and tbh im not even sure wat it was for but was from a time i was helpin an ex gf. if i can get away with not payin them then that would suit me!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...