MO v Virgin Media (refund of charges)***WON***

[MARTIN3030]

Greeeeeeeeeeat.

I never doubted

Ok will leave you to tell the story-and duly change thread title

[mo]

well it finally says mo won,ive been to court today and judge threw it out because v.m. have not sent any documents either to me or to court,this is the second time,i would like to thank martin 3030 for all his help i coudnt have done this without him and i think he will be glad i will stop moithering him now lol.if everyone one claimed against them im sure they woudnt be able to cope with a lot of cases,once again thanks martin and mr lex,and all the team

[MARTIN3030]

I am aware that the behaviour of VM legal team,in at least 3 other cases,mirrors Mo's experiences.

VM have been systematically failing to comply with Court orders,have been late filing,and have frequently sought to frustrate due process.

 

It is essential that VM claimants bring this behaviour to the Courts attention.

[kiptower]

well done Mo and thanks to Martin for helping

[Bookworm]

No doubt some will try and say it wasn't a "real" win in court, but I think most of us recognise this for what is it: a complete victory for Mo. Well done!

[MARTIN3030]

No doubt some will try and say it wasn't a "real" win in court, but I think most of us recognise this for what is it: a complete victory for Mo. Well done!

 

 

someone.

 

 

[Bookworm]

So how much was it for in total? (says she not wanting to re-read 8 pages thread! )

[mo]

600.0 plus interest plus court cost plus sar plus expences..v.m. wernt happy

[MARTIN3030]

And NO....they wont be appealing-the Judge refused point blank to allow one.

[MARTIN3030]

As far as I know-this is the highest single amount they will have had to pay from all the cases I are aware of-both from a Court or out of Court sett.

So this is a very nice result.

[littlefatbudha]

well done, i am wanting to follow your lead !

[MARTIN3030]

Just one point that should be mentioned.

Those following this-will have seen that there has been a good deal of exchanges off the main site area here.

This was done in consideration of preventing VM from being in any position to benefit from work behind the scenes.

Whilst CAG does not encourage the use of pms and off site exchanges where it can be done within the confines of the thread,it was felt appropriate here.

 

However,a more detailed chain of events,together with those things it was felt needed to be concealed temporararily,will be posted here,once its considered in the interest of all concerned.

 

This was the agreement originally and will stand.

 

There are a couple of VM claimants at an advanced stage who it is likely will be relying on some of the things in MOs case.

So please be a little patient -for more to be posted.

We do not want to compromise those other claimants cases.

 

Thanks for understanding.

[fergal71]

hi martin, any joy with helping with my POC's????

[Mr lex]

Superb result Mo and Martin.

 

Very well done Mo for sticking with this

 

Top man Martin !!

 

Lex

[mo]

thanks for your help mr lex,theres been plenty of times when i wanted to throw the towel in,and without martin i probably would,not heard from them since court tho.

[MARTIN3030]

Mo dont let this go now-if needs be we will let the bailiffs do the job-or better still a HCEO;)

[Mark_Blackpool]

Interested in the link to the Early day motion - seems to date from 2007. Does anyone know where this stands in legislative terms?

 

As an amusing aside, I'm sitting here debugging a .NET web application and so searched in a separate Internet Explorer tab on the UK Parliament site only to have a .NET error page come up - thought I'd mixed the two windows up

[Bookworm]

If you get a .NET error, does it count as GROSS incompetence?

 

 

 

*gets coat*

[maybelline]

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

 

I have been arguing with same for a very long time, charging £10 late payment, £5 handling charge and £1.50 paper bill????????????????

 

I think I started a thread a while back, will search around,

great news, well done for sticking with it!!!

[locutus]

This one maybelline?

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-consumer-issues/11016-non-dd-charges.html

[mo]

ive heard nothing from v.vm. no cheque,nothing,should i

 

 

1. get a warrant

 

2. ring the legal department

 

3.ring the chief exec office

 

4.ring watchdog

 

5. do all 4.?

[themadcap]

600.0 plus interest plus court cost plus sar plus expences..v.m. wernt happy

 

Did you get a awasted costs order MO? I'm in court 3rd Sept and expecting the same response

[MARTIN3030]

Mo has apparently now been sorted.

[fergal71]

Hi martin, have you had chance to look at mine now Mo's is completed... really feel like I am waiting to long and virgin might try to have struck out????

[MARTIN3030]

Soz Fergal-will be in touch this week-theres a couple of things I need you to clarify-will go through what you have sent me again.