Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Re: Cap1/Debitas/Frederickson-V-Creditcardmug


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5728 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

So glad I found this forum! Loads of helpful advice! I felt like I was the only one!

 

I have a debt with a Cap1 credit card, which fell into arrears for the first time for three years, in January 2008.

 

I wrote to Cap One in the beginning of March, offering a repayment plan, but also requesting that all charges be removed - also demanding that their agents refrain from contacting me at work. I received a response saying that the offer was acceptable, but as I hadnt signed the letter, a signed copy was needed. I sent this by return post.

 

Three months later I receive a letter from Debitas saying that they have now taken over the account. So I wrote them, outlining what had gone before. Last week I received two letters from Debitas, the first one giving me the opportunity to respond, the second arriving 4 days later saying that one of their agents was going to come to my house! I then received two threatening phone calls at work at gone 7pm in the evening, telling me if I didnt arrange a repayment plan over the phone, I would 'have to deal with the consequences'. The operator would not give their name or the name of their manager, nor would they listen to my demands to conduct my account in writing.

 

I have written to Debitas - but have now drafted a letter explaining that I dispute the amount I owe (£350 in charges have been added to a £400 limit account), that I am aware Debitas are part of Cap1 and have not purchased my debt and have given them notice that they are no longer to contact me by phone - quoting all the relevant acts.

 

Is there anything else I can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lipservice, welcome to forum ,when you say you wrote to DCA was it requesting

 

Copy of CCA

copy of assignment of loan

SAR to CAP1

 

Also was a default notice sent and do you still have copy. IN FUTURE DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING THAT GOES TO DCA.

 

Manc1

MANC 1

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Only my letter to Capital One was signed.

 

My letter to the DCA was only a typed signature (as advised on here).

 

However, since my last post I have received a letter from Capital One saying that they have closed my account and they have the right to request immediate and full payment. It also says that they 'may' sell my debt onto a debt collection agency.

 

I have received no default notice at all.

 

I do not know what 'SAR' or 'CCA' means, so therefore havent requested them. Sorry guys! I really am as green as I am cabbage looking!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Only my letter to Capital One was signed.

 

My letter to the DCA was only a typed signature (as advised on here).

 

However, since my last post I have received a letter from Capital One saying that they have closed my account and they have the right to request immediate and full payment. It also says that they 'may' sell my debt onto a debt collection agency.

 

I have received no default notice at all.

 

I do not know what 'S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'request for information made under s7 of the Data Protection Act 1998, this is used to request ALL the info they hold on you or 'CCA' means,request for a copy of the credit agreement (CCA=Consumer Credit Agreement) so therefore havent requested them. Sorry guys! I really am as green as I am cabbage looking!

 

hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that :)

 

However, I believe Debitas (the company now harrassing me) are NOT a DCA, but a legal branch of Capital One -will they have that information? Do they have to have it?

 

The only person I have spoken to at Debitas, made it perfectly clear that if I wasnt able to pay in full or set up a repayment schedule over the phone, that I would have to "accept the consequences" - a direct quote!

 

I will give it 7 days and see if I get any response to the two letters I sent sent to Debitas last week.

 

Thanks again so much for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK send the CCA request in the first instance to whoever is chasing you for the debt....send it be recorded / guaranteed delivery, send it with a postal order for £1 - DO NOT HAND SIGN IT and at the top of the letter type - PLEASE NOTE I WILL ONLY CORRESPOND IN WRITING - ANY CALLS MADE TO ME WILL BE CLASSED AS HARRASSMENT AND TREATED AS SUCH... The CCA request is letter 'N' from here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

Also add to the bottom of the letter with regard to a doorstep visit...

 

Please be advised I reiterate that I will only communicate with you in writing. I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone over the past few weeks/months and these have been duly logged by time and date.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

I have received a letter today from Debitas (dated 19th June).

 

It begins that 'Unless I call them immediately they will consider taking further action'.

 

It continues that despite their attempts to help me pay the debt, I have failed to either deal with the debt or call them. That I have left them no alternative but to consider next steps to recover the outstanding debt, which could include passing or selling on the account to an external DCA who may consider pursuing the debt through County Court.

 

The next part is headed that 'It is important that I should understand what it means if the debt in pursued through the courts'.

 

If the debt is pursued through a court then I would be liable for court and solicitors fees and that if a CCJ is issued, the following mau happen;

 

1)That payments will be taken directly from my wages

2)Obtain an order for me to attend court and supply details of my financial situation.

 

It finishes by saying that this is my last chance to pay this debt. Please do not put off calling us any longer.

 

What do I do now??

 

I have sent them a repayment offer in writing that has been ignored.

I have sent them a letter saying that I wish to conduct my business in writing only, that has been ignored.

I have sent them a CCA request that has been ignored.

 

Do I contact Capital One directly and sort this? It seems it is still in their hands as Debitas are some kind of internal DCA.

 

Please help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the time delay in between you sending the CCA request and getting this letter, did you send recorded (if so have you checked its been delivered?)

 

If it has been delivered then sit back and do nothing, they have 12 + 2 days before the debt in unenforceable in court then in an additional 30 days, they have committed a criminal offence

 

The letter you have received is written to SCARE you into payment do not pay them anything!

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

What will happen next is either they will come up with their usual excuse for an agreement, or they will pass it on to the infamous fredericksons, without informing you. (read all about freds on here ,lots of threads).

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update.

 

Have received a letter from Debitas apologising for calling me at work and wishing to offer any further assistance!

 

Also received a letter from Cap One saying the same thing, but they have obviously recalled the debt from Debitas and have asked me to submit and income/expenditure form (any advice on this?)

 

Best of all... not one single phone call!

 

Thanks guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LS, which department asked for the I&E -does it say? I used to work for the Specialist Support Unit at Cap 1 so i can give you a few pointers if needed :D

THE PRETENDER AGENDA - August 30,2008 - 2ND ROW!!! WOO-HOO!! :-)

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR A FAB NITE LEE! xx

Sunderland 011008 - THE BEST BIRTHDAY PRESSIE EVER! 'Aww, it's your birthday! Happy birthday darlin!'

 

02 Apr 2008, 23:55

OfficialLeeRyan wrote:

i like that!! its simple and good and gets the fans involved aswell x x x

 

MY SUCCESSES -

 

1st Credit (Lloyds TSB) admitted no CCA, reply from OFT 130608, reply from FOS 040608, adjudication stage rejected but still no contact....

 

My mate (Littlewoods/Moorcroft)

300608 -Long running battle,threatening court, CCA letter NO 2 and harrassment letter sent - passed back to Littlewoods early July.

070808 - Passed to Debt Managers, Acct in dispute/BOG OFF letter sent 080808...

140808 - Letter from Debt Managers passing debt back to Littlewoods - RESULT! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Also, dont fill in a Capital One I/E form. It will come wrapped up in a very misleading 'pack' with bright young things in the glossy picture on the front ... Don't know if you've had one of these yet. Don't complete it. Take a look at the templates for I/E, what is actually required - not what Capone ask or claim is - on CAG. And, again, wait for further advice from someone on CAG.

 

As far as I am aware they do not comply with BBA/MAT - least the one I was sent hasn't this logo on it - guidelines on completing a financial statement. As with most things Capone *sigh*. And if they ask for bank statements come back here for further advice. They go into way too much detail for what is required ... and are looking for ANY income you have surplus to what you can physically afford to pay. That's what CCCS told me they were doing, anyway. Comparing their forms with the ones here ... I know which ones I would be using. ;)

 

Oh, the phone calls? All I will/can say is they will leave you alone for a while ... then batten down the hatches, they will begin again. Most likely in a few weeks or sooner time. Trust me, they will begin phoning again.

 

Finally, they will inevitably get round to asking you to supply bank statements, wage slips or any benefit you may be in receipt as 'proof' of your income. Do not let them have them; in the case of benefits, there is a VERY good reason not to let them get access to it; they will attempt to take money from your benefit, but also have your DWP claim office and national insurance number. Very bad. Again, come back here for advice. They cannot ask you for these documents, only a court can. I know this, because they asked me on two occasions, despite replying with information I found on CAG when I first joined stating in no uncertain terms to get lost on that score!

 

If you already know all of the above, please forgive me ... but it may be helpful to others who are new, will read this. Oh, ignore it, if so. :D

 

Anyway, welcome. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

The I&E form I recieved was just a single sheet of paper and came from Capital One Specialist Support Unit. The accompanying letter says I have 28 days to complete and return it. The form itself requests that I include other debts I have.

 

Interestingly, I since received another letter from Debitas saying that as I have made no offer of repayment (apart from the 3 I have sent in writing of course!) they are going to sell my debt on to a DCA. I was so annoyed I called them and told them thus;

 

1) The call was being recorded

2) That I have been informed in writing that the account is in the hands of Capital One

3) That if they contact me again with threats, I will seek legal advice on grounds of harrassment

4) If they require further information on the account, they should contact Capital One.

 

On the flip side I have had a dispute notice added to my credit file as I do not agree the amount I owe to Capital One (they have added £315 in charges since February, doubling the amount I owe)

 

So what do I do now? I have 15 days left to complete the I&E!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously mate, do nothing - dont contact or anything! Once the timescale is up, the debt is unenforceable!

 

Giving info to them is like handing your rifle to the Taliban

[CENTER][CENTER][B] Has this post helped you?[/B] [/CENTER] [LEFT][CENTER]If so please click on the scales!! [LEFT][B]<--------------------------------[/B] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/LEFT] [/CENTER]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update.

 

Ok, so still no CCA from anyone!

 

Now have Cap One AND Debitas chasing me.

 

Oh and have checked my credit report and Capital One have now changed my account to 'default' in the last two weeks - despite them giving me 28 days to return the I/E form. I havent received any default notice either.

 

 

:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously mate, do nothing - dont contact or anything! Once the timescale is up, the debt is unenforceable!

 

Giving info to them is like handing your rifle to the Taliban

 

I certainly couldn't disagree with anything there!

 

My advice don't sign anything, they don't have genuine agreements anything they do send is made up.

You are also under no obligation to fill in their I&E form, and even if you did the next letter would require you to send proof of income i.e where you work, in order that they can harass you still further

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Send this to NCO...

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

Dear Sir or Madam,

Account number: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the **original creditor/DCA** and has been since DATE 2007.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

My last letter from **original creditor/DCA** was DATE and intimated that my complaint would be

resolved on **DATE**, this obviously hasn’t happened.

As **original creditor/DCA** are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, OFT Collection Guidelines, *Subject Access request and have also breached *s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the **original creditor/DCA** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as **New DCA** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If **New DCA** chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...