Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Recommended Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi,   I sent the email to both my local councillor and the leader of my local council yesterday evening. I didn't receive an acknowledgement email. Do you know if I should have, as I know that if you ever email an MP you always receive a acknowledgement email?   Walshy
    • Can I ask how your taking him to court with just his a trade name ?  Yes I notice hes still trading on ebay.   
    • Very good finds indeed which help to undermine their case.. And to strengthen your case take a look  look at a thread by Tom Price also at Southend airport which is several threads below yours and you will see that he won his case on the fact that he was stopped rather than parked. On top of that he had the Airports Act  1986 to quote. The relevant section is no 63 " Byelaws are covered at S.63  (2)Any such byelaws may, in particular, include byelaws— (d)for regulating vehicular traffic anywhere within the airport, except on roads within the airport to which the road traffic enactments apply, and in particular (with that exception) for imposing speed limits on vehicles within the airport and for restricting or regulating the parking of vehicles or their use for any purpose or in any manner specified in the byelaws;" That confirms that the roads at the airport are either covered by the Road Traffic Act or Byelaws neither of which is relevant land therefore  PoFA cannot apply. And  VCS should be aware of that. Another thing is that when you posted their WS you didn't include their contract which I missed at the time. However Tom Price included it in his. And guess what-the  alleged offence they are pursuing you for, No Stopping, is not included in their contract. If you look at the end of their Service Agreement [aka contract] you will a list of contravention on Scedule 1 [7] (46) PARKING/WAITING ON A ROADWAY WHERE STOPPING IS PROHIBITTED That is the nearest to what you did. But you were not parking nor waiting -you were stopped so there was no reason to issue you with a PCN as you never broke any of their contraventions. Looks like they breached your GDPR and you should include that as it carries a hefty charge £750 is not unheard of.   Have a read of his WS too which may give you further ideas even possibly to rebut some of the points VCS  make.
    • Lawrence Stroll, executive chairman of Aston Martin, told the BBC he wants to build a firm with a "luxury profile". View the full article
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

CapQuest/HBoS Statutary Demand


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3421 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Here we go - a supposed CCA from CapQuest, hence yesterday's solicitors letter.

 

Well I can see no real prescribed terms - the APR is not clarified is it? The right to cancel says I have a short time and how and when will be sent on to me, no credit limit, no monthly repayments and total amount with credit, the terms and conditions are on the back, which I believe have to be on the same page(?), but could be acceptable?

 

Again, the bit under "The Agreement" states, "I understand that Halifax Plc may use credit scoring techniques to assess my application."

 

Anyhow, they have committed a criminal offence by non-compliance to the 42 day deadline and the debt is unenforcable at this time. I gather this is like my Smile CA - unenforcable due to being incorrectly executed.

 

Your thoughts please.

 

Halifax.jpg

 

Halifax2.jpg

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As no one seems to want to even read this, maybe I should put in what I have now gleaned from this. The APR is not totally clear, although it appears as the title of the card, it doesn't say "Halifax Classic 10.8% APR Flat Rate Card".

 

It is not signed by anyone at Hbos.

 

There is no total amount of credit repayable on a maxxed out card as there is no credit limit stated.

 

There is no repayment structure and total amount repayable if only minimum payments made.

 

I think this then makes it an unenforcable agreement over and above the fact CapQuest have committed a criminal offence and cannot enforce this debt without a court order. But why would they want to go to court when they have defaulted and committed a criminal offence?

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mincemeat

It has the credit limit statement and it also has interest rates listed. This predates the 2003 OFT guidelines so these can be in the T&C's listed. The only thing this doesn't have is a signature from HBoS.

 

This would fly as an agreement (IMHO) but then if they issued you a replacement card they have broken s85 CCA 1974 (copy of an EXECUTED agreement).

Link to post
Share on other sites

What credit limit is on there then?

 

It has to provide the credit limit at time of signing. Else what was I allegedly signing this for?

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mincemeat

Look under '7. Important Financial & Related Details'

 

'We will set a credit limit for your account and tell you what it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mincemeat

I've just read the other thread you've mentioned. Sending a s77/8 CCA 1974 request for an overdraft is a waste of time as they are exempt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Look under '7. Important Financial & Related Details'

 

'We will set a credit limit for your account and tell you what it is.

 

OK so I signed for a credit limit I hadn't yet been told about?

 

been here before.

 

 

I've read a few of your posts and I am not sure of your motives here. All seem to be telling people you are right and they are wrong.

 

What overdraft is this then?

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mincemeat

You need to check the regs regards required items. A statement stating something along the lines of 'we will tell you your OD limit' is acceptable.

 

The overdraft is from :

 

'Thanks Rory I thought it was the case but one needs to be sure. So 2 unenforcables - I got a Barclaycard Student Application form from Cabot - and 5 no shows. Not a word from Fredrickson International/Bryan Carter re: CCA on NatWest overdraft, nothing from 1st credit, 2 holding letters from CapQuest and 1 from Lowells and this time next week the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on HBOS will have reached 40 days.'

 

... written by you on the 19th May 2007.

 

Read the 1974 act and the 1983 regs, overdrafts are exempt from s77/8 so sending a CCA request to a DCA chasing an overdraft is a waste of time.

 

I'm attempting to stop people messing up their cases by acting inappropriately and showing an ignorance of the law, hopefully stopping them filling in N1's incorrectly and stopping their court actions from being laughed at by the judge and the other side. I'm actually helping you, can you not see that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tomterm. Can I ask where they signed the agreement? As if you refer to the very faint stamp mark below "You have lived at the above address for.." it reads:

 

"RECIEVED

-3 SEP 20 (rest illegable)

(printed squiggle not a real sig.)"

 

However, I may be wrong in thinking it has to be a real signature.

 

Rory has sent me some info on the overdraft CCA which mine falls under.

 

I was pretty sure this was similar to the Smile one in so much as the correct terms were not there. Thanks. ;)

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that might be the case, hence my mode of questioning on the signature front.

 

I fully agree that nowhere does it say anything to the effect of "please read and check details and read all T&C's overleaf before signing. Upon signing you are agreeing to the T&C's overleaf", or something similar.

 

OK Tomterm, thank you for your help. It is as I suspected but slightly changed re the signature front, which I now understand. :)

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mincemeat
On a basic contract law level, I do not believe that the terms and conditions sent with the CCA are relevant, since there is no evidence that they you had sight of them before or at the point that the contract was made, and since your "Agreement" does not contain a reference to them, or an offer for you to have sight of said terms and conditions in the agreement. Neither are the terms and conditions signed by you, which would make them effective.

 

I disagree

 

I fully agree that nowhere does it say anything to the effect of "please read and check details and read all T&C's overleaf before signing. Upon signing you are agreeing to the T&C's overleaf", or something similar.

 

Apart from where it states 'I have received a copy of and agree to be bound by the Conditions of Use'.

 

Oh, and failure to produce documentation under s77/8/9 request for an overdraft, or any other part of the act, does not place the lender in breach of the act.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mincemeat
The agreement mentioned in this thread is a credit token agreement, and is therefore not excempt from the prescribed format of the act.

 

Correct, but is does predate the 2003 guidelines on form of agreements and therefore the requirements of the signature document are lessened (e.g. interest rate, credit limit etc)

 

I'm not trying to be difficult and I'm not trying to put you off anything, I'm just attempting to add a glint of reality that certain people seem to either miss by their blinkered view to the law and to counter the rediculous gung-ho attitude of a number of contributors (and controllers) of this site seem to allow and condone

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

OK I CCA'd CapQuest over 2 alleged credit card debts back in April. On May 2nd they defaulted and on June 1st they committed an offence.

 

However, CapQuest came back with what appears to be a CA but on closer inspection is a non-enforcable piece of paper as it doesn't have the legally prescribed terms on it.

 

So I sent them a letter asking them to set the account to zero, compensation for continuing to process my data, cease and desist from further harassment, etc. Also informed them they cannot enforce the debt and cannot get it infoced in the court.

 

I hear nothing for a few weeks then they send me a letter demanding immediate payment and thanking my for my correspondance. Attached is a copy of the non-enforcable bit of paper which is headed "This is a Credit Agreement".

 

I won't go into too much here but they also said they investigated me and I asked for proof of the finding they said they found which is utter bull anyway, and they have done nothing to answer this.

 

Should I report them to TS and ICO and also just do the broken record and re-send the letter I sent?

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I can't add more here Vamp....i'm sure someone will assist....I think there are several letters on other threads which address the non conformance, whatever happens DEFINATELY report them to TS and ICO....

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.

 

DEBT COLLECTION LETTER/SAR/AGREEMENT TEMPLATES ARE HERE - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?65-legislation

 

IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU

 

I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU

 

IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.

Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.

If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.

 

Forum rules - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
It has the credit limit statement and it also has interest rates listed. This predates the 2003 OFT guidelines so these can be in the T&C's listed. The only thing this doesn't have is a signature from HBoS.

 

This would fly as an agreement (IMHO) but then if they issued you a replacement card they have broken s85 CCA 1974 (copy of an EXECUTED agreement).

HI

RE; The ammended agreement regulations that came into effect on september 2005.

The rules about what should be contained was not(broadly speaking) altered in the respect of what terms should be in the agreement,although ther ae significant changes in the form, it should contain the vast proprtion of schedule one which contains all the prescribed terms in accordance with the type of agreement it is.

The information contained within the agreement must be just that, a link to a seperate terms and conditions has never been acceptable.

 

As to weather this would be acceptableas a correctly executed agreement. Again if any of the terms are to be lawful they are to contained within the agreement. Reference to the T and cs or another document wil not and never has been adequate.

 

If tis is second sheet is part of the agreement then it seems to have all the prescribed terms so unenforceability s unlikely.

However it does not pretend to conform to the form of agreement as prescribed in1983/1553 and does not contain several of the other items from schedule one and schedule five which would make it enforceable only with a court order.

 

REgards

Peter

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Peter.

 

The original CA copy sent to me as per the photos - this has the T's & C's printed overleaf. However, when they re-sent this, there were no T's & C's overleaf.

 

The Agreement box states "I have recieved a copy of and agree to be bound by the Conditions of Use". It makes no reference to "overleaf" which another agreement I have says and actually hasn't got them overleaf.

 

Plus this turned up after an offence was commited on the out of time production of the CA.

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 weeks later...

OK I've got this HBoS/CapQuest debt that 'appears' to be good. I know I have to SAR HBoS to remove the charges, but as I've been away from the forum for a bit, can anyone tell me the coup with claiming charges on credit cards? Is it still good to go or on hold?

 

I'll be fair, CapQuest will STILL accept my £1.00 per month and have offered to drop the debt by £600 - not that I could afford to pay it off and I'm sure that's only the charges removed anyway.

 

But, I fell floored by it and they are threatening court action by 16th Sept if I don't comply.

 

If I SAR does that stop them seeking court action immediately or not?

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S. they still send this to a mispelt surname - is it really my debt?

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claiming card charges is relatively straight forward.

Now as Capquest where happy with your payment I'd send them a letter back saying you are disputing the balance with the original creditor due to unlawful charges. Should keep them quiet for a bit, oh yes and while this is going on as a GoGW I'm will to make a token payment of £1 a month. ;)

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get ya! ;)

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 9 months later...

Just received a Statutary Demand from CapQuest which has £703 of interest included! Nice!

 

It's also written to a name which isn't mine. For example if my name was Collection they have written to Colction and the SD is in that name, i.e. they have missed 2 letters out of my name on both the letter and the SD.

 

The debt was CCA'd some time ago and a CA was given but several people on this forum have agreed the CA isn't enforcable due to the wording and the fact I signed the front form and there was not CA T&C's on the front of the form.

 

I wrote back to them disputing the debt and requesting compensation under the Data Protection Act and for them to stop misusing my data, to which they ignored this. I have had one or two letters back from them but effectively the debt is still in dispute with me.

 

The SD was dated for yesterday and the covering letter dated for today and it only arrived in the post today - ESP or what?!?!?

 

Not quite sure where to go being as it has been CCA'd, I suppose I could S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) it immediately???

 

All advice greatfully received - thanking you.

Egg/CapQuest 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

Barclays Bank/Lowell 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 ****RESULT****

 

Halifax/CapQuest 1 - CCA sent 12/04/07 SD issued ****WON with COSTS****

 

Barclaycard/Cabot - CCA Sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

Smile/Lowell 2 - CCA sent 12/04/07 Unenforcable Application Form

NatWest/Fredrickson International - CCA sent 12/04/07 No Reply

 

Halifax/1st Credit - CCA sent 17/04/07 No CA but Threats from 1st Credit & Connaught! - Still Nothing but still chasing!

 

Student Loans Company/CapQuest 3 - CCA sent 11/06/08 - No Reply.

Lowell 3 - Ignored them went over their heads to Capital One

 

Halifax - S.A.R - sent 17/04/07 Completely incomplete!

Halifax 2 - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Capital One - S.A.R - sent 11/06/08 - Scant Info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to your local Court and swear an affadavit to have this SD set aside. It costs nowt and if successful you can go for costs against Craquest.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...