Jump to content


OT Stuff from Parking Forum


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5755 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I agree with others that we should stand united. Believe me Perky and his kind will not win. I take it from the mods remarks that this site is under some sort of spurious legal attack from Perky (he being a master of spurious legal threats). That was tried a few months ago against Pepipoo by some debt collectors/wannabe lawyers/chancers on behalf of a "pie eater" and they did not get very far. Last I heard the chancers were under investigation themselves for offences possibly committed. Just in case the mods are concerned, as is clear from the Sheffield Wednesday case, personal remarks, insults, abuse etc are NOT classed as libel and there is absolutely no need to keeep editing them as is happening here. It appears commonsense is being replaced by paranoia. Just my two penneth anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Really BW then bully for you ............ Hang on.......... you allow named Judges to be called ars*s on this site............ but not perky or his mates bit of inconsistency there I think. & which is the more serious I wonder, a judge being called an ar*se or some [edited] being called an ar*se

 

Also as has been pointed out calling someone a jerk or an idiot who is actually a jerk & an idiot is not libellous so there's now't to defend apart from someones paranoia

 

& after what was implied about this sites data don't you think the boot should be on the other foot & it be he who is threatened with legal action

Edited by jonni2bad
Link to post
Share on other sites

and that is the point. The PPCs and their shills want the good posters to leave so they can ply their trade of misleading their victims unhindered.

 

when this happens it is all the more reason to stay. enough righteous posters will remain though I am sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly I'm on moderation as my last post hasn't appeared. No wonder some many valuable members have left this site

 

You're not on moderation, but some posts may have been edited - there's a world of difference between the two.

 

At to assume that people have 'left' the site because of actions like moderation of accounts is, to be fair, just a little presumptuous.

 

Firstly, posts are edited when either seen or reported, we can't see every post made, so rely on reporting.

 

If you think some posts are on site and should not be because they contravene our site rules, you could do us a favour and report them yourself (and by that, I mean specifically, not just "the post about a judge etc)

 

Secondly, of the few higher profile users who have made a grand exit, you might be quite surprised to find that a fairly healthy percentage return within a short space of time with shiny new usernames. How terribly they must have been treated, eh?

 

The truth is, some people just don't like being told that their posts are not what we would expect, perhaps more especially so when they are aimed at users who are generally perceived to be anti-CAG, or simply a 'pain' for one reason or another.

 

So, now that we've spent long enough dealing with issues that are completely off topic, lets concentrate on the thread. If you wish to continue discussion of other things, start a new thread. Alternatively, you can just ignore this request, in which case I will move them later...

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

*** The Cut-Off Point ***

Posts beyond here which are clearly off topic will be moved to the bear garden without further warning.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always good advice not to reveal too much on an open forum which could openly identify you if you believe it could be used against you in terms of legal action - I am myself now circumspect about what information I reveal in order not to give too much ammunition to those who could use it against me.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know what is happening with Perky's latest would-be victims that have come on here looking for help? I assume they are being helped? Obviously do not reveal too much as enemy eyes are no doubt still watching.

Rest assured they are being helped off forum for their own protection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rest assured they are being helped off forum for their own protection.

 

Nice one. I look forward to hearing of another "defeat" for Perky (or in Perky lingo "adjournment" - yeah right). Also looking forward to the transcript of the cases appearing on Perky's website under a heading "The Extent of Good Advice".

Link to post
Share on other sites

***Please note***

 

advice given via Private message or off forum because of its very nature cannot be checked for accuracy and we discourage such activity

 

it is in everyones interest to have advice given on the forum, there have been instances where our members have been duped into giving out their details via private message to the very people they are fighting against and this has caused them problems

 

Furthermore, i would like to point out that if the advice is given via private means then how can it be checked for its accuracy? the main strong point of this forum is the advice given is able to be checked by a broad array of knowledgeable people and corrected where necessary

 

if you are approached by any one offering help via a private medium, please inform a moderator or site team member

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must stress that said advice has not been given via this site. It mostly has been given via PM on a 3rd party specialist site which is of no concern of anyone on this forum.

Edited by PPC Buster
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know what is happening with Perky's latest would-be victims that have come on here looking for help? I assume they are being helped? Obviously do not reveal too much as enemy eyes are no doubt still watching.

 

Rest assured they are being helped off forum for their own protection.

I must stress that said advice has not been given via this site.

 

well from my reading of the first two comments above, it seem clear to me that members of this forum are being given advice in private which is what we actively discourage and was my point
Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are approached by any one offering help via a private medium, please inform a moderator or site team member

So you will ban people offering genuine helpful advice albeit in a private setting?

 

There are specialist websites out there that offer excellent advice and even there they will not advise people with active court cases to discuss same in a public setting. I can see nothing wrong with helping people offsite and in private and I shall continue to do so here and on other sites.

 

If the advice given was made public for discussion it would alert the likes of Perky et al to our defence positions which is an extremely unwise thing to do. Any lawyer would advise the same.

Edited by PPC Buster
Link to post
Share on other sites

So you will ban people offering genuine helpful advice albeit in a private setting?

 

 

Please refrain from trying to put words into my posts which simply arent there

 

at no time did i suggest that at all, however we would like to know if this is happening as in the past (as i previously posted) our members have been approached by people under the cloak of being kind helpful souls, offering advice by private medium and it turned out that the person was an employee of a private parking company

 

Now how exactly do we know that you are not one of the same? my point is before you misconstrue what i am saying is, that when you register on this and many other forums, all the info you need to provide is a user name, password and email then you can post professing to be an expert in this,that and the other and you may or may not know what the hell you are on about, unless the post is in the open forum how will we know.

 

Granted , itis not ideal to post your defence on here in some circumstances , however, i dont see why everything needs to be kept off forum there is a wealth of useful info that can be given which does not need to remain private

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

***Please note***

 

 

 

advice given via Private message or off forum because of its very nature cannot be checked for accuracy and we discourage such activity

 

 

 

it is in everyones interest to have advice given on the forum, there have been instances where our members have been duped into giving out their details via private message to the very people they are fighting against and this has caused them problems

 

 

 

Furthermore, i would like to point out that if the advice is given via private means then how can it be checked for its accuracy? the main strong point of this forum is the advice given is able to be checked by a broad array of knowledgeable people and corrected where necessary

 

 

 

if you are approached by any one offering help via a private medium, please inform a moderator or site team member

 

 

 

'Report anyone who offers help of thread they should be reported'

 

Really does that include all of us because I have on occasion given advice off the board, in fact I'm doing it right now with a member who is in a very difficult situation & frankly posting the circumstances in detail as this time isn't going to help one bit.

 

There are occasions when it's much more prudent, in fact essential to offer advice off thread, out of sight of the MIB who trawl these pages

 

Also whilst a godsend to many this site is not the be all & end all for some who are caught up in very complicated issues or proceedings & to suggest that everyone posting on an open thread can be assisted to a satisfactory conclusion is rubbish

 

How do I know well you'll just have to take my word for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please refrain from trying to put words into my posts which simply arent there

 

at no time did i suggest that at all, however we would like to know if this is happening as in the past (as i previously posted) our members have been approached by people under the cloak of being kind helpful souls, offering advice by private medium and it turned out that the person was an employee of a private parking company

 

Now how exactly do we know that you are not one of the same? my point is before you misconstrue what i am saying is, that when you register on this and many other forums, all the info you need to provide is a user name, password and email then you can post professing to be an expert in this,that and the other and you may or may not know what the hell you are on about, unless the post is in the open forum how will we know.

 

Granted , itis not ideal to post your defence on here in some circumstances , however, i dont see why everything needs to be kept off forum there is a wealth of useful info that can be given which does not need to remain private

 

What can I say....... rubbish.......If a member has already started proceedings then the last thing that they should do is post their intentions on here. Much better to leave it until matters are concluded

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are telling the truth I cannot why details of any case cannot be posted? All details of your case will have to be revealed to the otherside at some point. This is after all meant to be a forum to discuss consumer matters, if we all posted our problem then got the solution 'in private' it defeats the object of the site in my opinion.

I would like to remind you that Perky was once a contributor to the site and was free to PM members and give advice on how to deal with PPCs!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OT posts from

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-offences/144471-perky-defeated-oldham-county.html

 

have been moved here. If you think your post has been moved accidentally and was a useful contribution to the discussed case, please report it to the team and we'll take a look, and apologies in advance if it shouldn't have been moved, there were 11 pages of them to wade through and 10 of them are here now, so draw your own conclusions! :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have had 3 CAGbot PM to inform me that my three posts early in this thread have been moved to the bear garden.

 

You state here that the OT posts have been moved.

 

Perhaps, before I get totally p*ssed off, somebody could explain to my satisfaction why my posts were considered to be off-topic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a total shambles. The site expects us to discuss cases yet censors even the mildest criticism of PPC bosses, and in many cases no criticism at all. I know a certain PPC boss may have got at you but these actions do not engender any confidence in the forum. It seems we can all dis cuss cases as long as we do not criticise the other side. Truly weird.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree 100%. This site is a shambles. They have stopped me from sending PMs because I help people with good advice off thread. Tbh they might as well have banned me. The mods here are pandering to Perkys every whim.

 

It appears to me that Mr Perkins is really calling the shots around here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they admitted they have been got at then it wouldn't be so bad. At least then some of the bizarre decisions would be justifiable. But instead we are told they are doing this off their own bat. Now that is very worrying if true. Would this site censor criticism of a bank involved in a reclaim case? I think not. Why then the double standard?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...