Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Complain to FSA about misleading conduct from a High street bank


zootscoot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5675 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I lied, it was just the computer I was on in the office, I got the file no problem.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Done ;)

 

 

Y

Credit Cards

Barclaycard -WON! Amex - WON! MBNA (x2) - WON!

Mint - WON! Monument - WON! Morgan Stanley - WON!

Egg - WON! Halifax - WON! Sainsbury's Bank - WON!

Citi Cards -WON!

 

Banks

 

08/06/06 Claim against NatWest started.

01/11/06 Case Closed :)

 

08/06/06 Claim against Halifax started

24/08/06 Case closed :)

 

 

Visit my forum: http://www.planet-watch.org/forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

done:D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm new to the forum. I've just registered a complaint to the FSA as well but as a Barclays customer I've also received a letter explaining the new reserve charges and it states that I will automatically be subject to the new reserve charges unless I opt-out. This is contrary to what the thisismoney.co.uk article says. The article refers to customers having to 'consciously sign up to the reserve'. I don't know if the opt-out is a new tactic of Barclays to get more customers signed up unwittingly to the new charging system. From first impressions the charging system is complicated but seems to be preferable to the higher unauthorised overdraft fees so I don't think many customers would be motivated to actively opt-out. Also, they say that if you do opt-out and try and opt-in later, you might not be eligible.

 

Anyway, does anyone know if this is significant? and should I opt-out?

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm new to the forum. I've just registered a complaint to the FSA as well but as a Barclays customer I've also received a letter explaining the new reserve charges and it states that I will automatically be subject to the new reserve charges unless I opt-out. This is contrary to what the thisismoney.co.uk article says. The article refers to customers having to 'consciously sign up to the reserve'. I don't know if the opt-out is a new tactic of Barclays to get more customers signed up unwittingly to the new charging system. From first impressions the charging system is complicated but seems to be preferable to the higher unauthorised overdraft fees so I don't think many customers would be motivated to actively opt-out. Also, they say that if you do opt-out and try and opt-in later, you might not be eligible.

 

Anyway, does anyone know if this is significant? and should I opt-out?

 

 

Thanks

 

Hi can you give a link to the article which claims you have to opt in then scan & post a copy of your letter which says the opposite, not forgetting to remove all personal details of course

 

I would like to send copies of it plus the money link to someone who interested in the banks shenanigans

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'm new to the forum. I've just registered a complaint to the FSA as well but as a Barclays customer I've also received a letter explaining the new reserve charges and it states that I will automatically be subject to the new reserve charges unless I opt-out. This is contrary to what the thisismoney.co.uk article says. The article refers to customers having to 'consciously sign up to the reserve'. I don't know if the opt-out is a new tactic of Barclays to get more customers signed up unwittingly to the new charging system. From first impressions the charging system is complicated but seems to be preferable to the higher unauthorised overdraft fees so I don't think many customers would be motivated to actively opt-out. Also, they say that if you do opt-out and try and opt-in later, you might not be eligible.

 

Anyway, does anyone know if this is significant? and should I opt-out?

 

 

Thanks

 

The article was wrong on this point. Barclays always stated that it was an opt out service which forms part of the complaint.

 

As to whether you should opt out it is upto you. The benefits you get from using the reserve is that any payment instructions will be guaranteed to be paid which could avoid embarrassment or inconvenience of having to rearrange payments. However, the cost for this is £22 for every 5 days that you use the reserve (regardless of whether you use it for the full five days). If you use the reserve each week this would amount to £88 per month which compares with other banks charges for unauthorised borrowing of fees between £15 -28 (although no guarantee that payment insrtuctions will be met). If you do opt out you still only get charged the £8 for transaction fees where payments are returned unpaid. So it would be a much cheaper option to opt out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done and what a pleasure that was too

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...