Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I love Cabot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well, quite obviously that's a lie as I have only just heard from them, and indeed of them this week. Your site is a wonderful beacon of dissent to the fiscal world, and thankyou for it. I am a big fan of consumer action, having recovered illegal bank charges in the past, and promoted the idea to everyone I know. But now I desperately need some help please. I defaulted on a Barclaycard nearly four/five years ago as my mental ex had clocked up over 20K of debts for me before I managed to get rid of her. I have struggled to keep on top of it all since then, but have managed fairly well, to the extent that I am paying it all back (until 2012). Except this damn Barclaycard which Cabot now claim they have bought. Interestingly enough I have had letters from a person called XXXX before now asking me to call him for a couple of years - about once every six months, but not from any company with whom I have dealt financially in the past. He now seems to be involved with Cabot...so probably a good thing I have never called him as they sound like a right bunch of XXXXXXX. I have not yet called them (don't intend to), nor written. They have sent me a ref no, and a Barclaycard Account no, for a debt of £5000 today. I recall only having a credit limit of 3K at the most on this card. Put simply have no way of finding even a thousand. What do I do?

Edited by gizmo111
Name and potentially libellous comments removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

cheers amigo,Any advice is most definately welcome.Just a relief to see so many people in the same fix, and all fighting back.Its high time the banks got screwed over for a change.I'll give the CCA a blast later this week and see if Cabot can raise anything other than gaffes. I'm guessing that as they haven't specified any deadlines to me for a response that a: they are trying it on, b: I have some breathing space at least before the calls start (even though I'm ex-directory) or, c: they send in the goon squad!I had a letter from them last week asking me to call them but without specifying why, hmmn, not gonna happen buddy, but it did say, "we now have confirmation of your address".Intimidating or what?Shame I binned it, as in my book thats intimidation. I got this one a week before the letter concerning the BC account they bought.So fingers crossed they can't raise a paper bag, and, thanks.Will let you know how it turns out.by jingo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the edit on my blusterings above, mods. Glad I'm still able to post here as this stuff has me worried! Sent in my CCA, got my £1 back last week, and the customary note to say 'we anticipate that we will be able to provide', information within 12 days etc. Plus the usual get out clauses of 'not being obliged', and 'in the event we are unlikely to obtain' said information. Hope this still gives me a fighting chance? How long do I give them now...also I don't want to sound stupid but what is the 12+2 thing all about? Does it mean 12 days plus 2 working days? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not stupid at all by Jingo! Send them this:

Thank you for your letter dated xxxxx returning the postal order for £1. which I enclosed with my letter dated xxxx however it is necessary to return this to you in respect of my request to you of the afore-mentioned date as in my letter of xxxx I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement related to the xxxx account under Section 77(1) and Section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act. You are reminded that you are obliged to supply these documents whether you are the original creditor or not under Section 189 of the CCA 1974. Then round it off with the info about the time limit etc.

The 12+2 days means the initial period of 12 days plus 2 days allowed for delivery, this excludes weekends, after this and you'll have sent it recorded delivery so you can track and trace on the Royal Mail site and nothing forthcoming you can cease payment and then count 30 calendar days whence the debt becomes legally unenforceable unless they come up with the goods. Hope this helps:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, ok, thanks, so it's 12 working days plus two grace for postage, thought it might be...but this should be revised really if they work weekends as its unfair on us poor consumers :) Ok, I'll send the next letter and hold tight, although they've been notified not to hassle by phone or doorstep, and as far as I'm concerned, from the date of the first letter my clock is ticking, and they have to provide within the stautory time limit, cheers for now. I should really start a working project folder and diary for this one...I have a feeling it's gonna drag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems that the original creditor is experiencing 'technical difficulties' with their archives. Hopefully what they are looking for has gone the way of my odd socks, the dodo, or the sets of keys we could never find. Surely a DCA should have to prove their ownership of an alleged debt as the new/ current creditor? Isn’t that the point of CCA-ing them in the first place? Why has this not yet happened, could it be that they do not in fact own it? Also in the most recent keeping you warm/ making you scared letter I got, the apparent debt has mysteriously shrunk by 2K. What gives?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I spent the £1 on sweets and comics. The beano was good last month. Having had yet more doorstep flotsam from Cabs recently, I'm wondering if I should send BC (to whom I allegedly owe money), a letter to request evidence of statments under the Data Protection Act (SAR). At least I could claim back all/any fees they may have charged me on this disputed account. If they have in fact sold this debt on, then they should have no grounds upon which to refuse the request or chase me for it themselves, right? Is this a good idea, or is it more like waving a red flag at a bull, admitting liability, and ownership of a refuted debt? They are still tyring to provide evidence for the CCA after all.

Edited by by jingo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Casbo have written to me, informing that they are unable to produce a CCA as requested "within the relevant time period". They have decided to "hold any action on my account until further notice". Which is nice. They also inform me that although they are now out of time, that they will continue to pursue the OC for my alleged CCA, on my behalf. I was under the impression that any further activity of theirs as DCA's would be a criminal offence post the 12+30 deadline, is that right? I guess I should now have a look at my credit record to see who has been tampering with it (defaults?) and get a heavy book ready to throw at them if its not removed posthaste. Where do I go from here guys??? Library, OFT?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a criminal offence for a DCA to continue to seek a CCA after the 12+30 deadline - the summary offence for a default was removed by CPUTR 2008 anyway - but they should not be processing or sharing your data unless they can demonstrate that they have your express permission, which is usually contained within the credit agreement.

 

Send them a s.10 Data Protection Act 1998 Notice - and expect them to ignore or try to waffle their way around it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks red, where do I find an example of the s.10 Data Protection Act 1998 Notice? Is there one online here already somewhere? Just my luck that they've packed in the the summary offence for a default....where does that leave consumers though???

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they return the payment that is their choice, it does not invalidate your CCA request, just file it, no need to send it back again.

 

Thanks for that, They have just done the same to me with two accounts. Should I just file the postal order, the letter returning to me and do nothing?

 

Or should I re-send it?

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The s10 Notice is in the templates section.

 

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 took away the CCA 1974 summary offence, probably because no-one was ever prosecuted under it. However, CPUTR contains some good stuff, particularly around the issues of misleading consumers by lying, being ambiguous, hiding or omitting material facts, and on coercion and aggressive trading, including threats of legal action that can't be taken - in other words, the stock in trade of the DCA. One of the most useful parts is that failing to comply with a code of practice to which the trader has subscribed is now considered misleading, and is prohibited. DCAs have to hold consumer credit licences, and so are obliged to comply with the OFT's Guidance on Debt Collection - so if they breach the Guidance, they also break the law. The same alpplies to the Banking Code and the silly CSA code too.

 

So, if Cabot can't produce a CCA, any demand for payment is still unlawful (s.77(6)) still applies; the big difference now is that the OFT can prosecute (via TS) under CPUTR if they don't play nicely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback y'all. On the downside I still can't find the s10 letter template, is it with the others where I got my CCA form from? I'm full of cold and not thinking too clearly at all. But, I seem to be in luck then if I want to voice any compliant to TS/OFT as the new legislation supports the notion that DCA's are in effect creditors, as of May 2008 right? Good for me as Cab's state they legally own this alleged debt. Bad for them as they have no CCA to support the claim. There seems to be some good stuff elesewhere on the forum about getting DCA's to remove defaults etc. on my credit record. I might have a go at putting something together this week. I'm also guessing that should Cabs send me another pay up or else type letter without CCA, that the OFT will have their gonads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's one:

 

STATUTORY NOTICE UNDER S10 DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998

 

At NO time have I given my written permission for you or your company to process my data

 

Therefore Take Notice that I require that you cease from processing within 7 days of the receipt by you of this notice or else that you do not begin to process any personal data of which I am the subject insofar as that processing involves the communication or passing of personal data of which I am the subject to any third party and insofar as the said data relates wholly or in part to the implementation by you of charges which have been applied to my account in respect of defaults or contractual breaches and where the said charges which have been levied at a rate which is in excess of the administrative costs incurred by you as a consequence of the said defaults or breaches contrary to The Common Law.

 

This Notice is given on the grounds that the processing or continued processing by you of the said data will be likely to affect my credit rating and my reputation and cause substantial damage and/or substantial distress to me and my family members in addition to that which may already have been caused and that as the processing of the said data in the way referred to in this notice would violate the first, fourth and sixth principles of The Data Protection Act 1998 to do so would be unwarranted.

 

 

Failure to remove ALL my data from your databases will result in a formal complaint to the Information Commissioners’ Office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...