Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Speed Camera Fine Maybe.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5025 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What fine do you get if you get caught on a fixed speed camera? Also How do speed cameras work? I was working this morning driving around and was going down this road which was 50mph. Then all of a sudden i seen these flashes and then noticed the speed camera. The speed camera was on the other side of the road facing me. I thought firstly that cameras worked on the basis that they only do the side of the road that the cameras are on and not the opposite side that your driving. I wondered why it had flashed me when it was 50mph. I turned around to have a look and the sign does say 50mph and then almost behind that something like 50 yards was another sign saying that the speed is 30mph which obviously i didnt notice as i had just saw the first sign for 50mph. I also remember that if it is on these yellow backgrounds that they dont conform to the specifications of the road traffic act and that they are unlawful or something, is that right? Also is that fair to have a 50mph sign and then almost behind it have a 30mph sign.

If you find this info useful please click on the scales in the bottom left corner of the thread :wink:

 

Vodafone To Remove Default Notices thread

Paid In Full HSBC Was Claiming £3851.42 But Instead of Paying Me Decided to pay my £4900 Loan OffDG Solictors. Need Help

Concluded Lloyds TSB 27/05/2006 Action Against LloydsTSB

Concluded Lloyds TSB for Girlfriend. 27/05/2006

Paid In Full Capital One £160 Settled

Paid In Full Capital One Sent 15/05/06 for £1372 for Girlfriend

Paid In Full Cetelem £130 Settled

Paid In Full The AA £400 Settled

Paid In Full First National £160 Settled

PDA LloydsTsb Credit Card Hand Delivered 26/04/06 £180

Link to post
Share on other sites

What fine do you get if you get caught on a fixed speed camera? Also How do speed cameras work? I was working this morning driving around and was going down this road which was 50mph. Then all of a sudden i seen these flashes and then noticed the speed camera. The speed camera was on the other side of the road facing me. I thought firstly that cameras worked on the basis that they only do the side of the road that the cameras are on and not the opposite side that your driving. I wondered why it had flashed me when it was 50mph. I turned around to have a look and the sign does say 50mph and then almost behind that something like 50 yards was another sign saying that the speed is 30mph which obviously i didnt notice as i had just saw the first sign for 50mph. I also remember that if it is on these yellow backgrounds that they dont conform to the specifications of the road traffic act and that they are unlawful or something, is that right? Also is that fair to have a 50mph sign and then almost behind it have a 30mph sign.

 

Were there signs on both sides of the road when entering the 30 mph zone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You post doesn't really make sense, do you mean you turned round and looked at the signs or turned the car around and went back? The signs would be correct if on different sides of the road one side you would be entering to 50 limit the otherside entering the 30 mph limit? Maybe if you could do a diagram or post a photo it would be easier to understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happens a lot - if it was a standard GATSO it will only record your speed whilst passing, NOT approaching it (Truvelo's do that). My local camera flashes me constantly as I approach but it requires a number of circumstances for this to be met - even so, the firing of the camera flash may not mean a picture has been taken. Assuming it was on the opposite side of the road to your direction of travel, I'd ignore it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A GATSO (two white flashes in quick succession) cannot be used for traffic enforcement on approaching traffic. They are only type approved for receding traffic.

 

A TRUVELO (purple flash) can be used to enforce in either direction. One flash if set for approaching traffic; two flashes for receding traffic. It cannot be set to do both simultaneously AFAIK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I found this link detailing many types of speed camera and how they work. clearlicence.co.uk - Speed Traps

 

Also, if you were doing 50 in a 30 you could expect a summons if caught. more here : clearlicence.co.uk - Points and Fines, a guide to the penalty points system. Totting up

 

If it was a classic Gatso camera then indeed it can only catch you as you drive away from it, not towards it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

For starters, is your speedo calibrated? They usually over-read by 10% so it it showed 54, you were probably doing 51-52. Also other things can make it fire, and will require a check of the two images. If you're that borderline, you;ll have nothing to worry about - or even if one of the older film cameras has run out of film, or indeed HAS no camera within the housing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For starters, is your speedo calibrated? They usually over-read by 10% so it it showed 54, you were probably doing 51-52.

 

also the camera would probably apply the ACPO guideline speeds before firing, i.e. on a 50 this would be 10% +2 =57mph. Bearing in mind this would be an "actual" speed so taking buzby's valid point into the equation too, your speedo would be reading about 59/60mph to trip the camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was recently caught by a camera at a set of traffic lights. I thought that these type only triggered if you went through a red light. The light was green and the camera only flashed once.

 

I have received a penalty notice through the post. Stating that I was doing 58mph in a 50 limit. To be honest I thought it was a sixty limit and I would have said I was in excess of this as I was late to pick up my daughter.

 

Strangley my friend has received a fixed penalty notice caught by the same camera. He also says that the traffic lights were green and the camera flashed once. According to the notice he was also doing 58mph. He feels he was doing nearer to 70.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A good many of these cameras are in the process of being upgraded do do both functions (whereas previously it was one or the other). I now tread all camera alerts as red light/seed, confirming with my GPS what the speed limit is from the icon on the display. This isn't foolproof, but it's right more often than it's wrong. well worth the initial investment!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...