Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Reclaiming - Egg Credit Card Protector Charges


tal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I want to reclaim back Egg Credit Card Protector Charges, is there a specific template to use for these charges and do i add the 8% interest ?

 

 

My initial claim for Egg charges update is they have offered me the full money as final offer and sent a letter for me to sign, which states i accept their offer as full and final offer

 

 

I want to reclaim the Egg Credit Card Protector Charges as well, so is it best to hold on and dont reply to Eggs offer to refund my normal bank charges and send a request for Egg Credit Card Protector Charges to be paid back to me, please help thanksmoz-screenshot-2.jpgmoz-screenshot.jpgmoz-screenshot-1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your screen file is unreadable, try load your picture onto Photobucket.com then cut and paste into your posting.

 

No idea what you mean by "Card Protector Charges". Is this the very small Sentinel insurance paid monthly in case you misplaced your card? Or is this the much larger Payment Protection Insurance against prolonged unemployment and sickness (being a proportion of your outstanding balanace)?

 

I have never heard of anybody trying to reclaim the completely lawful Sentinel insurance which they voluntarily opted to accept. As for PPI reclaim it is an uphill struggle against Egg defending every inch, more than likely ending in court. The only defeat ever inflicted on an Egg claimant in court was over PPI. Not a fight to start without solid justification, not a lawsuit limited to filling in the blanks on one template letter.

 

Overlimit and Late Payment penalty charges reclaim is entirely separate from PPI reclaim, and most people who pursued both did it separately, and were paid separately -- if they won both battles. Egg's full repayment offer to you for penalty charges (not PPI) will not stay on the table for long. Best to accept it now while making it clear it is for full and final settlement of penalty charges, not the entirely separate issue of PPI.

 

5 PPI battles won and lost:

 

34 weeks -
25 APR 2007 -
won PPI before court
-
Annalh v Egg/DLA/Eversheds ** Judgement given by court **

16 weeks
- 19 JUN 2007 -
won PPI in court
-
Empire strikes back v Egg Card Repayment Insurance.

08 weeks
- 01 AUG 2007 -
won PPI before court
-
Wednesday 1867 poss vs Egg
(
1
2
)

49 weeks
- 22 AUG 2007 - JULI99 -
lost PPI in court
-
Scrambled Egg
(
1
2
)

35 weeks
- 07 JAN 2008 - phatram -
won PPI, case stayed, stay lifted, Egg settled in full before court
(was self-employed and never eligible) -
http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/87077-egg-credit-card-ppi-3.html#post1314773

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the monthly amount for this "credit card protector" charge? Is it always the same, or does it fluctuate from month to month with the balance the way PPI does? When was the first time this charge appeared on your statement?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'credit card protector' appeared from my 1st ever statment, it flucuates with every statement depending on the balance on the egg card, i cancelled it after 2 years

 

i've added it up and its almost £1350 over the 2 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

At average £50 per month that looks like PPI, not Sentinel card loss insurance.

 

Egg card application is an online process, the onscreen form includes a box to indicate the applicant's intention to enroll for Payment Protection Insurance. A mouseclick in this tickbox will be recorded by a screen print which Egg will have filed as part of the initial application. Not sure if you received this screen print as part of your £10 SAR request. If you haven't you are entitled to it and can ask for it.

 

In the unlikely event you did NOT tick this box but Egg erroneously acted as if you had, then you would have an easy reclaim in court. With such strong evidence demonstrably against them Egg may settle before court.

 

But if much more likely you did tick that box, then you will need a strong explanation why despite your explicit request PPI should never have been sold by Egg to you, for instance you never qualified for PPI under Egg's terms, or you would never have been able to claim had you fallen out of work due to Egg's exclusion clauses. The judge will more than likely ask why it took you two years to realise PPI should not have been sold to you.

 

This is your reclaim to run as you see fit. The 5 previous reclaimant threads, 4 of them successful, will give you background reading. Your forerunners may possibly help you if you PM them nicely, but this is your case.

 

Not an easy one, and Egg will not roll over. Good luck.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...