Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The tech giant's business was likely boosted by US sanctions against its Chinese rival Huawei. View the full article
    • We hear from three people who have started their own companies during the downturn in aviation. View the full article
    • Covid-19 has created extra problems this Halloween, so how are firms fighting back? View the full article
    • its a 12mts contract else why would it say till 2021 and first month..   simply states they don't charge a joining fee clever marketing ploy as people don't read things. it IS a monthly payment, that runs for 12mts.   but anyway there is stuff and all anyone can do to you.   dx        
    • Hi Slick,   Amazingly fast reply, thank you!   According to the reference on the payment it says "ON 24 SEP BCC" and the payment cleared 25th September at 11:26   I was simply told to sign up on the website by a staff member in the gym, no further information was given to me by them. The website stated that it's a rolling monthly membership that could be cancelled at any time "No contract membership JUST £14.99 a month, until 2021*" As far as I am aware there was absolutely no minimum membership length, unless there's some small print I've missed somewhere. But Harlands haven't mentioned anything about me being obliged to pay for a certain length of time so... I've attached a picture to this post of what I signed up for.   Also, I'm not sure if this has any relevance at all but the building is plastered with £9.99/month signs EVERYWHERE yet it costs £14.99 when you go on the website. False advertising 🙄 Could perhaps use that as leverage in a letter if it comes to it, I dunno? 😂
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Railway Station Carpark - CP Plus Limited


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4208 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

RichardM,

 

Thank for taking the time to reply.

 

I was aware that BTP could be come involved for breach of the railway byelaws.

 

They also have the power to be able to demand the ID of the driver from the registered keeper. One must then presume that he either put his hands up or gave them the name of the owner.

 

Not an option open to the PPC here. They could try and hand it to BTP, but I would think that their 'evidence' wouldn't stand up to criminal requirements of proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the PPC is (presumably) contracted to supply these services why would BTP even bother. Having a dog and barking yourself springs to mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fair Parking.

 

Don't confuse the issue by bringing in CP Plus's other non-railway business practices, which are, in this case irrelevent.

On the contrary. In this case, CP Plus appear to be acting (from the signs and the notice) as a PPC and not as agent for a railway company.

 

From what is said, this situation is a standard PPC one, not a railway byelaws situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'll check the signs tonight; there is nothing on the charge notice.

 

Another question: My car is parked in this car park everyday. Is it realistic to ignore/resist many charge notices over time, or is that taking the mickey? Are there any examples of a PPC company changing tactics against a persistent "offender"?

Yes, there was a case on pepipoo several months ago about just this situation. The judge (only first instance mind) decided that as several notices had been issued that the driver had consented to the contract terms.

 

Surely you have a choice of various non-railway PPC car parks to play fun and games in?

Link to post
Share on other sites
as the PPC is (presumably) contracted to supply these services why would BTP even bother. Having a dog and barking yourself springs to mind.

 

One would hazard because breach of the byelaws is a criminal offence which BTP are duty bound to investigate following any credible report of such an offence taking place.

 

Unlike outside of the railway world, BTP can't say that it is nothing to do with them because it is de-criminalised enforcement - because it's not.

 

Court prosecution is the ultimate sanction here and it would be necessary for the PPC to go via BTP and thence the CPS. The PPC are unable to bring a criminal prosecution by themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, new to this forum but on reading this thread felt compelled to join and share my recent experiences with a station car park incident!

 

I am a daily user of a car park on the National Express Eastern line, formerly One railways, before that Anglian Railways. This car park is now under the operational control of NCP and back in Nov 07 I recieved a PCN for parking in 'a non designated/restricted parking area'. The day in question I bought my rail ticket and parking ticket at the ticket office, not the pay & display machine - this is something that was always available until recently. Once I got into the car park it quickly became apparent that there was an issue, all bays were full (unusual) and cars parked in every available 'space' - at least 30 spaces had been taken up with building materials, causing the ensuing chaos. Luckily I found a reasonable 'space' I deemed to be an acceptable parking spot and got on my train.

 

After getting my PCN on return I ignored it and waited, after approx 2 months the first letter arrived from Roxburghe (well known to this forum) which I acknowledged as the car park does fall under transport byelaws. My response was that as I had paid there was a contractual obligation between us which they had failed to deliver, if the parking area was restircted how was it that I was able to purchase a ticket to park in it. I also observed that the area I parked in posed no obstruction and therefore questioned the validity of any consequential loss or damages. Further correpsondence ensued with increasing potential charges and the threat of court. At this point I passed to my lawyers who I am lucky enough to have on retention to my company (no real cost), they wrote a letter again outlining the above and low and behold the matter was dropped by NCP citing lack of visual evidence altough I know the guy that patrols the car park does use a camera!

 

Sorry the above is a bit long bit I hope it encourages others here to question spuerious demands for money, that day at least 30+ tickets were issued - how many just blindly paid out?....a good percentage I think.

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

Hi

Can anybody help me?

I have today received a £80 Parking notice from CP Plus limited. I received this in shopping centre car park. The notice looks a little dodgy, claiming that if payment is not received that they will contact the DVLA to obtain my details. Can This company actually obtain these details... and if so, can they take me to court for payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should start your own thread and read the stickies about private invoices.

 

You have just received an unenforceable invoice - private companies cannot issue financial penalties, only recoup actual losses. It's a [problem].

 

Do not pay

Do not contact them

They will go away after 5 or 6 threatening letters

 

Virtually anybody can pay £2.50 to the DVLA for the registered owner's address.

 

Out of thousands and thousands of these tickets given out, we see 2 or 3 court cases a year. No private company has won a properly defended case in court that we know of.

 

Chances of you going to court are smaller than winning the lottery. We don't know of any cases of CP Plus going to court over their unenforceable invoices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Visited my local mainline Railway Station today, formerly run by GNER but now changed to a new company.

Parking signs have shot up faster than the grass on my lawn.

The signs shout about the railway regulations and what they can do with your car. This includes clamping, moving to another place, selling it at auction and charging you £70 if you fall foul of obstruction, parking out of the lines and not having a valid ticket etc.

I also met an old work mate who drives a Hackney Taxi from the Station.

He told me that every white taxi has to pay £35000 to be able to park at the station. He informed me that they did this at all the Stations from Edingburgh to London Kings X, and made millions

He tells me that all this new company want is money no matter how they can get it.

They have 2 parking attendents at this station and they are told to issue tickets come what may.

All we can look forward to is high train fares, higher taxi fares and more high car parking charges and thats rip off Britian for you.

This tells me that running safe clean, fast reliable trains is rather way down the list of thier priorites, and profit rules the roost.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

Quick update: I sent a letter based on a template from this site ("As the keeper I deny that I am liable etc...") nearly a year ago and I have heard nothing since. Result.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Visited my local mainline Railway Station today, formerly run by GNER but now changed to a new company.

Parking signs have shot up faster than the grass on my lawn.

The signs shout about the railway regulations and what they can do with your car. This includes clamping, moving to another place, selling it at auction and charging you £70 if you fall foul of obstruction, parking out of the lines and not having a valid ticket etc.

I also met an old work mate who drives a Hackney Taxi from the Station.

He told me that every white taxi has to pay £35000 to be able to park at the station. He informed me that they did this at all the Stations from Edingburgh to London Kings X, and made millions

He tells me that all this new company want is money no matter how they can get it.

They have 2 parking attendents at this station and they are told to issue tickets come what may.

All we can look forward to is high train fares, higher taxi fares and more high car parking charges and thats rip off Britian for you.

This tells me that running safe clean, fast reliable trains is rather way down the list of thier priorites, and profit rules the roost.

 

Can't see the small print on the white sign too well, but there's always the chance these are phoney threats.

 

Until you get a ticket, hard to judge what will happen. I'd be impressed if this company actually put people in magistrates court.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...