Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interest rates


skyelet
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question, but can SLC really be charging me £35 per month in interest ?

 

Im not even paying back this much as i earn 14,500PA, with the little bit of overtime i do, makes it just over 15,000....

 

Surely if i stay where I am i will simply be paying money to them for nothing, as my loan will never get cleared off....

 

And no, I cant afford to increase payments, got 1 2YO and 1 on the way

 

Im so upset as I didnt even finish uni :(

 

Only scraped past the 1st year 2nd time round :(

HSBC Credit Card - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Received a blank form

Barclays Partner Finance - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Recieved nothing

GE Capital Bank - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Received signed true copy

Argos Card Services - CCA sent 16.09.08 - Received nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SLC are currently charging interest of 4.8% pa interest on loans which means that £35 a month is how much you would pay on an outstanding loan of approx £8750.

 

Repayments are at a rate of 9% on any earnings over £15000 so to pay off just the interest you would need to earn approx £20000.

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have exactly the same amount of student loan debt and I can not envision earning £20,000 for something like ten years and I am already 35.

 

They are adding £35 a month to the debt out of thin air and I am on the dole, in rented accommodation with no chance of getting a mortgage or a car. Who are they kidding? I am starting to wonder if I should just let their fanciful addendums to the debt pile mount up to the point where it topples over and not bother to repay it back at all. I can take the p*ss too!

Edited by pencil
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, what are you talking about? They are charging a very low interest rate(in fact, in real terms, 0 interest) - why can you possibly think that this is unfair?

 

And BTW - I am paying double the interest of the OP above on mine...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not in real terms. In real terms, the interest rate is zero, as it is kept inline with inflation.

 

5% for that size loan is a bloody good deal BTW.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just to clarify. You think it is SLC's fault that you are on the dole, SLC's fault to add interest just to keep the debt at the same level(AND at a level you agreed to, by the way), and SLCs fault that you cannot get a mortgage?

 

SLC are only performing with the loan in exactly the fashion they offered, and you agreed to. That is, as a LOW COST loan percentage wise, that is kept in line with inflation.

 

With that kind of "pass the buck" attitude, I would suggest you look a little closer to home regarding your problems.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it's really 5%, really £35 a month, out of thin air.

 

£35 "out of thin air"? No, £35 at a 5% interest rate.

 

I suggest you know what you are talking about before correcting.

 

In economic/financial terms, "real" terms means as adjusted for inflation.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just to clarify. You think it is SLC's fault that you are on the dole, SLC's fault to add interest just to keep the debt at the same level(AND at a level you agreed to, by the way), and SLCs fault that you cannot get a mortgage?

 

SLC are only performing with the loan in exactly the fashion they offered, and you agreed to. That is, as a LOW COST loan percentage wise, that is kept in line with inflation.

 

When I agreed to the loan the interest rate was 1%, Or as you insist, "0%" really. If there is a depression and hyperinflation, is that student's fault or the government's?

 

With that kind of "pass the buck" attitude, I would suggest you look a little closer to home regarding your problems.
I would suggest the SLC look a bit closer to home regarding their's as well.
Link to post
Share on other sites

When you agreed to the loan, the interest rate was VARIABLE in line with inflation.

 

Do you think that because of recession they should wipe out your debt?

 

Look - I'll say this as simply as I can. You had the enjoyment of the money. Why are you so against the SMALL interest payments(compared to the interest rates you would get anywhere else) for the very sizeable loan you had?

 

More to the point, you arent even paying anything at the moment!!!

 

The rate works out as zero %, because it only increases as prices increase. If they did not do this, there would still be 14grand debt in twenty years, when 14grand would be what 8grand is worth today. It is quite fair and reasonable for them to expect, and perform actions resulting in, the debt to hold its value.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the government taxes this unemployed person here £35 a month I find it hard to take you seriously at all because of your continued insistence that the interest is zero really, and I have had to put you on ignore. There's one born every minute.

Edited by pencil
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fine - no skin off my nose. Others with the ability to understand concepts, will know exactly what I am saying.

 

Your loss - you against the world, and I'm afraid you are wrong.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...