Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO Services Problem.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5811 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I too received the bogus "First Direct Logistics" letter, called them back today regarding it and stupidly asked who the letter was from.

 

They then informed me that the letter was from HFO, who I then found a number for online and contacted regarding why they'd be contacting me. The gentleman who answered couldn't tell me why but said someone would call me back. I asked how they had my number he informed me it'd come up on his screen.

 

I then received a call from an Indian sounding chap a short while later informing I owe £330-odd to them regarding an old debt to 3G. Now, the issue here is, one the debt must be around 5 years old, and secondly I'm sure my sister paid it off for me as she helped me out with my debt back then.

 

The Indian sounding guy said they've sent the letter out again today (I asked how he'd know that seeing as they're not the courier company, didn't get an answer to that). He asked me to prove I'd paid it, I've asked him to prove I owe it.

 

The conversation didn't go much further than that and then I came and read people's stories on here regarding these clowns and am feeling fairly nervous and unsure about what might occur now.

 

What do I do?

 

 

 

Thanks a lot in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Whattheheck and welcome to CAG :)

 

First and foremost, never speak to them on the 'phone. From now on, everything in writing!

 

Respond to the First Direct Logistics with a "prove it" letter.

 

Unfortunately, my usual computer is poorly but I've asked someone to come and post up a copy of the "prove it" letter which asks them just that ;) It's up to them to prove you owe the debt and not the other way around!!

 

Bo :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi try this

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy I thought Whattheheck would be better off sending a "prove it" letter as opposed to a CCA request at this stage ;)

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

I/we look forward to your reply.

Yours faithfully

 

Great Username btw Whattheheck :D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help so far guys.

 

Received the letter today...

 

I spoke to three (got their number from their website) regarding my old account and they've said that the last payment received was by me in Feb 2005 for £98, and that the account has indeed been passed to HFO. My issue here is, I can't for the life of me remember them contacting me regarding any outstanding debt and infact any reason for any outstanding debt.

 

I'll post pics of the letter later on to see if anyone else recognizes them.

 

It's on two pages, one from "3", and one from HFO.

 

The "3" bit says on it about HFO now managing the debt, therefore I need to pay the outstanding balance of £253.27 on your 3 mobile account exclusively to HFO Services Ltd.

 

What it means for me?

 

Because my debt is being managed by HFO, there are a couple things you should know, so it's a good idea to read the following changes carefully.

 

- From nom on, send all payments to clear your debt straight to HFO Services Ltd at the address shown below.

- If you're making regular payments, you shouldn't stop them for any reason, but you should make all future payments to HFO Services Limited.

- If you have any questions, call HFO Services Limited on or write to:

 

HFO Services Limited

PO Box 342

West Byfleet

Surrey KT14 6YX

Telephone: 08456006128

 

These changes don't affect the Terms and Conditions of your original 3 contract. If you've settled your debt in full in the last 7 days, please disregard this letter.

 

And it's signed off at the bottom by Jim Waddell, Head of Collections, Hutchinson 3G.

 

Incidentally, it's dated 14th May 208 at the top, strange?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Whattheheck

 

This seems to be a common HFO practice - letters from the alleged OC and from HFO arriving at the same time. You need to find out if the letter from '3' really has come from them - I've received copy letters of assignment supposedly from an OC that have typographical errors in them... They're probably printed on the same type of paper!

 

This is interesting because HFO state they are a factoring company, ie. they buy debts outright, not manage them.

 

Any other HFO aficionados got any ideas about this?

Edited by DonkeyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey again guys, right, so the situation has changed somewhat.

 

They called on my phone Wednesday last week and I answered it to inform them I'd be contacting them in writing and not to contact me on the phone. I've not yet sent the letter off, I will be doing that first thing tomorrow.

 

Today, they called me around 30 minutes ago on my mobile and I didn't answer. 2 minutes later, the home phone rang and my mother answered it, handing the call to me as they asked for me.

 

I asked them how they got the number, they said it was listed under my address but I got myself ex-directory last year. Are they hunting through old directories for numbers?! Also, this is my parent's home, is there no rule about calling?

 

The help I guess I need badly is to ask what letter I should write them tomorrow to ask them to a) prove the debt and b) not call me on either mobile or home number from now on.

 

This is starting to get ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are bluffing - if anyone comes they are not Bailiffs, but just doorstep collectors. DO NOT LET THEM IN AND DO NOT GIVE THEM ANY MONEY. There is a letter in the templates you can print out and give them.

 

Contact YOUR trading standards and HFOs trading standards department about this behaviour - state you have complained verbally and in writing to HFO and they have increased the harrassment rather than stopping it.

 

State that they are contacting family members about your debt (very much against the OFTs code of practice). Contact the OFT as well. Copy in HFO on each letter - and state that if anyone does call you will be calling the police as they will be demanding money with menaces without any proof of the amount you owe or an order from a court about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot.

 

So first things first, tomorrow I will sent them,trading standards and the HFO trading standards department a letter regarding the calling of my home (which now leaves me in a position of HAVING to answer my mobile as I don't want them bothering my home.)

 

What kind of letter do I sent to the OFT?

 

What do I ask the guy for? I've asked for a CCA? What about an SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just feel really worried because I honestly don't know what the deal with this whole situation is. Don't want these guys turning up on my doorstep with some court order as the gentleman(lol) on the phone suggested they would that allows them to break in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're idle threats and the usual cr*p that DCAs like to frighten you over the 'phone with which is the reason why you should NEVER speak to them on the 'phone. In the extremely unlikely event that anyone does show up, just remember that they have no more rights than the postman or pizza delivery man and you are quite within your rights to tell them that they are tresspassing and to bog off. Better still, print off a copy of the letter by PT2537 (post #21) in the following link, post one off and keep a spare handy to give to them should they decide to pay you a visit :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/120537-stupot59-lowells-2.html

 

That should kill two birds with one stone ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...