Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO Services Problem.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I too received the bogus "First Direct Logistics" letter, called them back today regarding it and stupidly asked who the letter was from.

 

They then informed me that the letter was from HFO, who I then found a number for online and contacted regarding why they'd be contacting me. The gentleman who answered couldn't tell me why but said someone would call me back. I asked how they had my number he informed me it'd come up on his screen.

 

I then received a call from an Indian sounding chap a short while later informing I owe £330-odd to them regarding an old debt to 3G. Now, the issue here is, one the debt must be around 5 years old, and secondly I'm sure my sister paid it off for me as she helped me out with my debt back then.

 

The Indian sounding guy said they've sent the letter out again today (I asked how he'd know that seeing as they're not the courier company, didn't get an answer to that). He asked me to prove I'd paid it, I've asked him to prove I owe it.

 

The conversation didn't go much further than that and then I came and read people's stories on here regarding these clowns and am feeling fairly nervous and unsure about what might occur now.

 

What do I do?

 

 

 

Thanks a lot in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Whattheheck and welcome to CAG :)

 

First and foremost, never speak to them on the 'phone. From now on, everything in writing!

 

Respond to the First Direct Logistics with a "prove it" letter.

 

Unfortunately, my usual computer is poorly but I've asked someone to come and post up a copy of the "prove it" letter which asks them just that ;) It's up to them to prove you owe the debt and not the other way around!!

 

Bo :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi try this

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy I thought Whattheheck would be better off sending a "prove it" letter as opposed to a CCA request at this stage ;)

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

I/we look forward to your reply.

Yours faithfully

 

Great Username btw Whattheheck :D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help so far guys.

 

Received the letter today...

 

I spoke to three (got their number from their website) regarding my old account and they've said that the last payment received was by me in Feb 2005 for £98, and that the account has indeed been passed to HFO. My issue here is, I can't for the life of me remember them contacting me regarding any outstanding debt and infact any reason for any outstanding debt.

 

I'll post pics of the letter later on to see if anyone else recognizes them.

 

It's on two pages, one from "3", and one from HFO.

 

The "3" bit says on it about HFO now managing the debt, therefore I need to pay the outstanding balance of £253.27 on your 3 mobile account exclusively to HFO Services Ltd.

 

What it means for me?

 

Because my debt is being managed by HFO, there are a couple things you should know, so it's a good idea to read the following changes carefully.

 

- From nom on, send all payments to clear your debt straight to HFO Services Ltd at the address shown below.

- If you're making regular payments, you shouldn't stop them for any reason, but you should make all future payments to HFO Services Limited.

- If you have any questions, call HFO Services Limited on or write to:

 

HFO Services Limited

PO Box 342

West Byfleet

Surrey KT14 6YX

Telephone: 08456006128

 

These changes don't affect the Terms and Conditions of your original 3 contract. If you've settled your debt in full in the last 7 days, please disregard this letter.

 

And it's signed off at the bottom by Jim Waddell, Head of Collections, Hutchinson 3G.

 

Incidentally, it's dated 14th May 208 at the top, strange?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Whattheheck

 

This seems to be a common HFO practice - letters from the alleged OC and from HFO arriving at the same time. You need to find out if the letter from '3' really has come from them - I've received copy letters of assignment supposedly from an OC that have typographical errors in them... They're probably printed on the same type of paper!

 

This is interesting because HFO state they are a factoring company, ie. they buy debts outright, not manage them.

 

Any other HFO aficionados got any ideas about this?

Edited by DonkeyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey again guys, right, so the situation has changed somewhat.

 

They called on my phone Wednesday last week and I answered it to inform them I'd be contacting them in writing and not to contact me on the phone. I've not yet sent the letter off, I will be doing that first thing tomorrow.

 

Today, they called me around 30 minutes ago on my mobile and I didn't answer. 2 minutes later, the home phone rang and my mother answered it, handing the call to me as they asked for me.

 

I asked them how they got the number, they said it was listed under my address but I got myself ex-directory last year. Are they hunting through old directories for numbers?! Also, this is my parent's home, is there no rule about calling?

 

The help I guess I need badly is to ask what letter I should write them tomorrow to ask them to a) prove the debt and b) not call me on either mobile or home number from now on.

 

This is starting to get ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are bluffing - if anyone comes they are not Bailiffs, but just doorstep collectors. DO NOT LET THEM IN AND DO NOT GIVE THEM ANY MONEY. There is a letter in the templates you can print out and give them.

 

Contact YOUR trading standards and HFOs trading standards department about this behaviour - state you have complained verbally and in writing to HFO and they have increased the harrassment rather than stopping it.

 

State that they are contacting family members about your debt (very much against the OFTs code of practice). Contact the OFT as well. Copy in HFO on each letter - and state that if anyone does call you will be calling the police as they will be demanding money with menaces without any proof of the amount you owe or an order from a court about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot.

 

So first things first, tomorrow I will sent them,trading standards and the HFO trading standards department a letter regarding the calling of my home (which now leaves me in a position of HAVING to answer my mobile as I don't want them bothering my home.)

 

What kind of letter do I sent to the OFT?

 

What do I ask the guy for? I've asked for a CCA? What about an SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just feel really worried because I honestly don't know what the deal with this whole situation is. Don't want these guys turning up on my doorstep with some court order as the gentleman(lol) on the phone suggested they would that allows them to break in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're idle threats and the usual cr*p that DCAs like to frighten you over the 'phone with which is the reason why you should NEVER speak to them on the 'phone. In the extremely unlikely event that anyone does show up, just remember that they have no more rights than the postman or pizza delivery man and you are quite within your rights to tell them that they are tresspassing and to bog off. Better still, print off a copy of the letter by PT2537 (post #21) in the following link, post one off and keep a spare handy to give to them should they decide to pay you a visit :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/120537-stupot59-lowells-2.html

 

That should kill two birds with one stone ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...