Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Morgan Stanley & HFO


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5833 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

This is my very first post, I hope somebody can help me.

 

I received a letter from Morgan Stanley in October 2006 stating that they had accepted a partial settlement on my credit card and that payment had been received. tHey also told me that they would not chase me for the outstanding debt.

 

I received 2 letters from Morgan Stanley soon after this requesting payment or court action would be taken. I sent them a copy of the letter dated October and nothing else happend. In February 2007 Moorcroft contacted me stating that they were going to commence legal action unless I paid the debt to Morgan Stanley. Once again I sent the October 2006 letter and I had no response. This month HFO contacted me giving me 7 days to pay my debt to Morgan Stanley else they would commence court action against me, again I sent back a copy of the October 2006 letter.

 

HFO now appear to be dropping the case against me but I want to nail Morgan Stanley if possible. They have caused me and my family unnecessary stress and have not done what they said they would do in 2006.

 

Does anyone know of anything I can do against Morgan Stanley to obtain compensation and give them the kick up the backside that they require? Also how much compensation could I claim, if any?

 

Thanks in advance

 

The Robbler

Link to post
Share on other sites

robbler

 

i would put a complaint into the OFT, not so sure there would be any redress for compensation though

Regards

 

vselym

 

"Every day, and in every way, i'm getting better and better" - Chief Inspector Dreyfus

Link to post
Share on other sites

vselym,

 

Thank you very much for this, I will try the OFT.

 

Is there anyway that I can get my story out in the open, maybe damage Morgan Stanley for the b**tards they really are?

 

Cheers

 

Robbler

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will come back to this thread later and start you off what to do with HFO AND MORGAN STANLEY but in the meantime YOU must issue a CCA notice to HFO and a SAR NOTICE TO MORGAN STANLEY also issue a HARRASMENT LETTER TO HFO ,

back later dont worry about hfo we will do our utmost to guide you through all this

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is it?

 

A Subject Access Request (SAR) is a request sent from a data subject to a Data Controller requesting information about themselves.

It is a legal requirement under the Data Protection Act (DPA) for the data controller to comply with this request within a 40 day timescale as outlined in the DPA.

[edit]

Subject Access Request Example

 

 

[your address]

 

 

[their address]

 

[DATE]

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable. I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

[name]

 

[edit]

Download this file

 

MS Word Format: SAR.doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robbler

 

if im reading this right, your "we will take no further action" letter from 2006 deals adequately with dca's, and your real issue is with MS for not abiding by what they wrote

 

if so, the SAR that patrickq1 suggests you send to MS, should produce all communications you have had with MS since the beginning of your contract. This may be of use if there are reclaimable penalty charges included within, and should also determine what if anything they are still doing with your account.

 

a CCA request should produce a copy of your credit agreement. If MS dont respond within a timescale of 12+2 days with the said copy, then the debt would enter a dispute status at which point no-one can attempt to ask you to pay anything, if after a further 30 days, ie 44 days in total, they still have not replied then they would have committed a summary criminal offence, but at this point it offers you a complete defence against enforcement via the courts.

 

as i said at the start of this thread, i still think your best bet is a complaint to the OFT, in conjunction with the suggestions from patrickq1

Regards

 

vselym

 

"Every day, and in every way, i'm getting better and better" - Chief Inspector Dreyfus

Link to post
Share on other sites

if so, the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) that patrickq1 suggests you send to MS

yes correct this should produce all data not just corespondance

the cca shall be (when i post it that is )for the benefit of HFO asking them to produce all documents they have in their possesion and also to stop all corespondance with them until they produce the contract/agreement he had with MS and also should produce the actual copy of the letter asigning this contract to HFO

without this they have no right to continue their corespondance until such

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vselymn & patrickq1,

 

Thanks for this, it is most appreciated, so I send a SAR to MS, a CCA to HFO and contact the OFT, I have an example of a SAR and I can right to the OFT, do you have an example of a CCA anywhere that I can use to contact HFO?

 

Your help is most appreciated, for 18 months these b**tards have been trying to get me and they are starting to get me down.

 

Cheers

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

robbler

 

try here "letter N" for cca request

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

or you may want to take a look at this

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/letter-templates/131230-dca-response-demands-after.html

 

i still think that a cca to MS would be worthwhile, my logic is that if they fail to comply, coupled with the letter from 2006, will strengthen your case with the OFT

Regards

 

vselym

 

"Every day, and in every way, i'm getting better and better" - Chief Inspector Dreyfus

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes letter N but as well as that you also want to send a harrassment letter to also explain you have sought a stay to their actions through the court but do this a week after you apply for the stay

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

vselym and patrickq1,

 

you are both brilliant, I have the letters written and I will get them in the post today. I have written a SAR to MS, a CCA to both HFO and MS, a harrassment letter to HFO and a complaint letter to the OFT using the templates provided, we will see what happens from here.

 

Cheers

 

Robbler

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, make sure you dont sign them, pay by postal order, both actions to avoid possible photoshop experts getting some practice in, and send by a recordable royal mail method to prove service of documents should you need to

 

well done

Regards

 

vselym

 

"Every day, and in every way, i'm getting better and better" - Chief Inspector Dreyfus

Link to post
Share on other sites

MOH has the same problem with MS. He has letters saying they will not be pursuing and two years later they have sold to a DCA. He is handing it to the FOS and has complained to TS. Suggest you put your case to FOS too so they can see these are not isolated incidents.

Disgraceful business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from Morgan Stanley in October 2006 stating that they had accepted a partial settlement on my credit card and that payment had been received. tHey also told me that they would not chase me for the outstanding debt

yes a letter of complaint is in order as well the more the merrier

they have been doing this a lot lately selling debts that have been quashed by themselves so it is naughty

also you might like to check on the origional bill and see what the difference is between the new debt as this extra is not legal either so go for it

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...