Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Frustrated and scared


bman2906
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5698 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All

 

I hope somebody can give me some advice on how to return my life to normal. (This is my first post so if I am posting in a way that I should not please let me know.)

 

I currently have three defaults, the one is due to drop off at the beginning of June 08 so my thought process is to let this run its course.

 

The other two seem to be more of a bigger problem. They are both for the same debt (Is this legal?) The first is with vodaphone (ex singlepoint) and marked as satisfied for 57 the second is with 1st credit and marked as satisfied for £72. Vodaphone are refusing to remove the default even though I never recieved the default notice and first credit have the cheek to tell me that the debt is still outstanding and that thier client are unable to provide a copy of the agreement or statements..

On top of this I have today found a final statement from singlepoint with a £25 credit on.

 

I have read through countless pages of wonderful advice from all you brilliant poeple out there and understand that I now need to request a S.A.R, however my real question is do you think I have a solid case to pursue. Desperatly need to get a mortgage this year and do not want to go down the sub prime route.

 

Any advice would be gratefully appreciated.

 

bman.:|

 

ps sorry again if this post is in the wrong place or inappropriate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi bman2906

 

on the face of it, i would say you have a strong case for removal of at least one default marker without much hassle

 

it is not possible to default the same account twice, so try this letter to the cra's in the first instance

 

Dear Sir Or Madam

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT UNDER YOUR CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006 COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE

 

NOTICE TO CORRECT DATA UNDER DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998

 

 

I note that you have registered a default on XXth against account XXXXXX on XXXXX. Subsequently, you have issued a default notice on DATE.

 

 

Default is defined by the credit reference agencies as the termination of account for cause.

 

 

It is not possible to default an account twice, since by definition the account has already been closed. Attempting to register a default X years after already registering one is against the guidelines issued by the information commissioner, and is regarded as an unfair practice.

 

Please take this as a request to correct data under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Please send me a copy of your complaints procedure as required by law, with acknowledgement of this formal complaint.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

XXXX. (type don't sign)

Regards

 

vselym

 

"Every day, and in every way, i'm getting better and better" - Chief Inspector Dreyfus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bman, speaking for experience may I say well done on taking step 1 to getting you debts and life back under control :)

 

Default removal is my area of specific intrest and so have done an awful lot of reading over the past year. Based on what i have read and on the situation you describ I'd certainly agree you have a sound argument.

 

1 default is about to drop off and vselym vbmenu_register("postmenu_1500114", true); 's letter above will remove the other. Your quite right that you need to get the SAR in and it sounds liek you've sent the CCA request and got a negative hit.

 

No agreement = no default but my plan i think would get the SAR info back and see if you can strengthen the case (i.e a repeat of no agreement and/or no default notice) then make a request for default removal based on that.

 

See what the info you get back says though and check what you do and do not owe then read read read so your reayd, if necessary, to take it all the way to court.

 

Let us know how it goes :)

************************

 

DCA Theats: Jystmystry V's Wescot - I Win (link)

Default Removal: Jystmystry V's NatWest - In Progress (link)

General Debt - Jysmystry v's Optical Express (link)

 

You can run but you'll just die tired

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. I had a letter from 1st Credit the other day; it appears that the water people got a CCJ by default on a property I owned but never lived in. Although they had my correspondence address they didn't use it.

 

1st credit were, as I expected, immensely unhelpful, but I have now tracked it down and it seems that 1st Credit have added to the judgment amount, almost doubling it. No wonder they were unwilling to provide a breakdown.

 

Since not only did I not receive the claim, I also live outside the Court's jurisdiction, so it'll be easy enough to set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

How did this go Bman.. any result?

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...