Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

buying a static caravan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3858 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you for your help.

I tried everything to write it on the google like: static caravan ,static caravan pitch, prices,sell etc. I tried what you wrote me,but i couldnt find a normal site which including st.caravan for sale with pitch, or just the pitch. I mean if you want to buy aa house or rent,you are looking through the agency or you are speak with the landlord,or owner. So i need one site where i can choose. You what i mean?:)

 

Moreover i read what you sent me but i think we are talking in 2 different ways. I just want to buy a static caravan (you can do it from 300-50.000 pound) with pitch,and after i`d like to let it in the season. So i thought i just buy it,pay for it to the owner,or to the agency and thats it,its mine .Or am i wrong? Please tell me if i`m thinking in a wrong way...But it seems easy:)(Maybe i`m wrong).So this way is working?Or how is it going? Can you help me with informaton?

 

One last question. If i buy my st.caravan and i let it to people in the season,do i need to be a self employer?

 

Thank you so much for your help.

 

ps.I tried the word con but there wasnt any normal site,sorry,maybe its my fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help.

I tried everything to write it on the google like: static caravan ,static caravan pitch, prices,sell etc. I tried what you wrote me,but i couldnt find a normal site which including st.caravan for sale with pitch, or just the pitch. I mean if you want to buy aa house or rent,you are looking through the agency or you are speak with the landlord,or owner. So i need one site where i can choose. You what i mean?:)

Moreover i read what you sent me but i think we are talking in 2 different ways. I just want to buy a static caravan (you can do it from 300-50.000 pound) with pitch,and after i`d like to let it in the season. So i thought i just buy it,pay for it to the owner,or to the agency and thats it,its mine .Or am i wrong? Please tell me if i`m thinking in a wrong way...But it seems easy:)(Maybe i`m wrong).So this way is working?Or how is it going? Can you help me with informaton?

 

One last question. If i buy my st.caravan and i let it to people in the season,do i need to be a self employer?

 

Thank you so much for your help.

 

ps.I tried the word con but there wasnt any normal site,sorry,maybe its my fault.

 

All indications are that it would be a very bad investment and chances of letting it 52 weeks of the year are zero. Chances of letting it 26 weeks of the year are almost zero. Chances of letting it 6 weeks of the year are very good. Taking that into account your profit margin is probably in the minus. You will never make money on a static caravan due to cost of caravan, site fees, maintenance and re-sale costs. If you bought a static for £50,000 today and sold it next year you would be very lucky to get £25,000. If you bought a Bailey Retreat for £23,000 and sold it next year, you would probably get £20,000. If you want more info try joining a caravan forum like "Caravan Talk" or "Practical caravan"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi,

 

I was wondering if you can help me or give me some advice.

 

I own a lodge at the Tingdene Marina Windsor. It was taken over by Tingdene and they have now changed their licence. I want to sell my Lodge for around £80,000 but they have written to me saying as it is over 10 years old (read the new licence) I cannot sell it!! It is 13 years old and when I bought it back in 2005 there were no clauses like this. I need to sell it due to personal reasons and need my money back. Where does this leave me? Can you give me any advice?

Thank you . Debra

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debra

 

You don't say whether this is a holiday or residential site, it does make a difference.

 

If it's a holiday site then there's an OFT guidance on Unfair Terms in Holiday Caravan Agreements which you need to download and have a good read. If they have issued a new licence, were you just told about it or was there some consultation? These sites will try and get away with everything they can and will keep telling you it's all in the terms and conditions. I agree, it is in the terms BUT they can be challenged, I did it twice, once in court, the second time I challenged the commission charge for selling, the contract stated buyer pays, the site charged me as the seller so I challenged it. The site settled out of court, they tried to tell me that they would get their money back from the buyer of my static and then tell the new owner to sue me. They forgot that there were 2 different contracts involved. They had a contract with me for selling, they sold on my behalf and then entered into a new contract with the buyer which had absolutely nothing to do with me so I thought 'tough, you should have read your own contract before sending it out'. They paid up on both counts, they didn't really have a lot of choice.

 

The court case was for a refund of my pre-paid site fees when I sold the static part way through the season. The site refused a refund saying I had signed the terms and conditions, but the non refund bit was an unfair term. The term restricting you to selling back to the site for a pittance is also an unfair term and you can challenge that in the small claims court. The law is the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, a very useful piece of kit to read up on.

 

If it's residential, i.e. you live in the lodge, then you will have to look at the Mobiles Homes Act 1960 (I think) which should give you some help. It will also be governed by housing laws which you need to have a look at, I don't know very much about that I'm afraid but I understand the laws have been tightened up in favour of the consumer fairly recently.

 

Good luck anyway and don't be afraid to take these vultures on. Do you homework, read the regulations, acts, anything you can get. It can be a bit drawn out but I can assure you it's well worth it in the end. It was worth it in my case to see the look on the site owners face when the judge told them to pay up on my refund, they were not happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I would like to thank you very much for your informative reply.

 

The site is a holiday site (9 months of the year).

 

Last year, enclosed with my "welcome back to the site" letter, it said that this year the licence agreement had been updated and to read it and that is when I discovered the fees for selling had increased to 15 percent and no sale of a caravan/lodge over 10yrs old.

I have an appointment at citizens advice in the morning and if they are unable to help then I have no choice but to look for a solicitor. If you had a solicitor, I would be grateful if you can give me their details.

 

Many thanks again,

 

Debra

 

Hi Debra

 

You don't say whether this is a holiday or residential site, it does make a difference.

 

If it's a holiday site then there's an OFT guidance on Unfair Terms in Holiday Caravan Agreements which you need to download and have a good read. If they have issued a new licence, were you just told about it or was there some consultation? These sites will try and get away with everything they can and will keep telling you it's all in the terms and conditions. I agree, it is in the terms BUT they can be challenged, I did it twice, once in court, the second time I challenged the commission charge for selling, the contract stated buyer pays, the site charged me as the seller so I challenged it. The site settled out of court, they tried to tell me that they would get their money back from the buyer of my static and then tell the new owner to sue me. They forgot that there were 2 different contracts involved. They had a contract with me for selling, they sold on my behalf and then entered into a new contract with the buyer which had absolutely nothing to do with me so I thought 'tough, you should have read your own contract before sending it out'. They paid up on both counts, they didn't really have a lot of choice.

 

The court case was for a refund of my pre-paid site fees when I sold the static part way through the season. The site refused a refund saying I had signed the terms and conditions, but the non refund bit was an unfair term. The term restricting you to selling back to the site for a pittance is also an unfair term and you can challenge that in the small claims court. The law is the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, a very useful piece of kit to read up on.

 

If it's residential, i.e. you live in the lodge, then you will have to look at the Mobiles Homes Act 1960 (I think) which should give you some help. It will also be governed by housing laws which you need to have a look at, I don't know very much about that I'm afraid but I understand the laws have been tightened up in favour of the consumer fairly recently.

 

Good luck anyway and don't be afraid to take these vultures on. Do you homework, read the regulations, acts, anything you can get. It can be a bit drawn out but I can assure you it's well worth it in the end. It was worth it in my case to see the look on the site owners face when the judge told them to pay up on my refund, they were not happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debra

 

I'm not too sure the CAB will be able to help you. You really need to go onto the Office of Fair Trading website and download the guidance. Have a good read of that, I am not at home at the moment otherwise I could quote you chapter and verse which bit you will need.

 

Basically, the site CANNOT change the original contract without giving you notice and issuing a brand new contract which has to be signed by both you and the site. Loads of these sites try the same thing and unfortunately owners are very wary of what these sites can do so they don't complain.

 

When I first bought a static on returning from living in France in 2009, the contract I had very clearly stated it was the BUYER who paid the commission on selling. When I sold, the site charged me as the SELLER the extortionate commission. During the court case to get the refund of pre-paid site fees, the change in the contract was mentioned and the judge asked the site if they had changed the contract. The site said yes. The judge asked whether they had notified owners and issued a new contract, the site answered no so the judge told me that was a separate issue.

 

The OFT guidance clearly says that the commission is open to challenge as well, although I have never known anyone other than me to challenge it. You also need to have a look at the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 which you can have a look at online, just google in that bit and it will come up with the details.

 

I didn't have a solicitor, I just used the consumer laws and quoted chapter and verse from those which seemed to do the trick.

 

When you go to the CAB make sure you talk to someone who is very conversant with consumer law because those are the regulations you need as this is a holiday site and not a residential one.

 

I'll have a look through what I have on this computer and see if I can give you any more information and post again if I can

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debra

 

Just found one bit that is in the Unfair Terms regs which may help, this is an extract taken directly from the regulations

 

An unfair term is one that creates a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights under the contract, to the detriment of the consumer, contrary to the requirement of good faith.

A term is most likely to cause an imbalance if it has the effect of reducing the consumer’s rights under the ordinary rules of contract or the general law. For example they either stop consumers from making certain sorts of legal claim against the business which they could otherwise have made, or give the business rights against the consumer that it would not otherwise have had.

But a term causing an imbalance must be capable of causing detriment to consumers, taken together with the other terms in the contract.

The requirement of good faith embodies a general ‘principle of fair and open dealing’. It does not simply mean that a term should not be used in a deceitful way. Suppliers are expected to respect consumers’ legitimate interests in drafting contracts, as well as negotiating and carrying them out.

 

Hope that helps a bit for a start at least

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debra,

 

Just found another bit which is taken directly from the OFT guidance and I think this is the bit you may need and may be extremely useful

 

Tying in

5.8 Caravan owners can find themselves tied to one agent or manufacturer when seeking to purchase a replacement caravan, and to selling the old

caravan to the park owner at a loss. Any requirement that the caravan owner must buy or sell a caravan only through the park owner or an appointed agent may be capable of causing financial detriment to caravan owners.[/b][/b] We doubt that such terms will amount to ‘core’ terms, but they may do so in certain cases. At any event the relevant terms need not only to be in plain and intelligible language but to be very clearly explained before the consumer enters the agreement to reduce the potential for unfairness.30

 

It's in Section 5 of the guidance and I think it's quite clear from that section that the site are treading on thin ice but they won't be expecting anyone to challenge them so go for it!! Also contact your local trading standards people, quite a lot of owners have done this but as they are scattered all over the country no-one has yet collated all the information so that the true extent of these rip-offs isn't really known. It's about time it was publicised to stop this happening and to stop people getting continually ripped off.

 

Unless a contract is individually negotiated, which these things aren't, you can read the contract and pick out the unfair terms and challenge them. To take it to a small claims court it has to be less the £5000, the fees are about £200 in total for that amount but if you are claiming more than that then I think you will have to see a solicitor but try and go with the consumer laws first otherwise the cost will be high even though you will get it all back at the end of the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi there,

 

Just to let you know that I had a meeting with a Director of Tingdene today and he tells me as the contract is renewed annually, they are able to change it?

 

I really have to go to the expense of finding a suitable solicitor but wat to thank you for all yor help and Emails, I really appreciate your time. Thank you

Debra,

 

Just found another bit which is taken directly from the OFT guidance and I think this is the bit you may need and may be extremely useful

 

Tying in

5.8 Caravan owners can find themselves tied to one agent or manufacturer when seeking to purchase a replacement caravan, and to selling the old

caravan to the park owner at a loss. Any requirement that the caravan owner must buy or sell a caravan only through the park owner or an appointed agent may be capable of causing financial detriment to caravan owners.[/b][/b] We doubt that such terms will amount to ‘core’ terms, but they may do so in certain cases. At any event the relevant terms need not only to be in plain and intelligible language but to be very clearly explained before the consumer enters the agreement to reduce the potential for unfairness.30

 

It's in Section 5 of the guidance and I think it's quite clear from that section that the site are treading on thin ice but they won't be expecting anyone to challenge them so go for it!! Also contact your local trading standards people, quite a lot of owners have done this but as they are scattered all over the country no-one has yet collated all the information so that the true extent of these rip-offs isn't really known. It's about time it was publicised to stop this happening and to stop people getting continually ripped off.

 

Unless a contract is individually negotiated, which these things aren't, you can read the contract and pick out the unfair terms and challenge them. To take it to a small claims court it has to be less the £5000, the fees are about £200 in total for that amount but if you are claiming more than that then I think you will have to see a solicitor but try and go with the consumer laws first otherwise the cost will be high even though you will get it all back at the end of the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they don't have the right to just change it if it is re-issued every year unless they make you aware of the changes and make it clear you are signing a new and re-worded contract. Be careful these people will tell you all sorts of things to try and scare you off. Have a good look at the contract laws which you can look at online by googling law of contract. Have a look at the consumer contract laws as well before you go to the expense of a solicitor. Sometimes a solicitor will not clarify a contract, that happened in my case so I did a lot of reading up and took the site on without a solicitor. You really need a solicitor who is a specialist in either contract law or consumer law - preferably both. Consumer laws can protect us but we really have to do our homework to make them work.

 

Let me know how you get on and if I can be of any help let me know

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
Hi, im actually a sales person on a caravan park on the Mid wales coast, please feel free to ask me any questions!!
. Hi I wonder if you could answer this for me. Would there be much difference in price for a bk caprice that is 38 x 12 as against 36 x 12. Built 2008. My reason for asking is we have been sold one and told it was 38 x12 and the contact we signed states 38 x 12 however my father said he saw a plaque on the side saying. 36 x 12 3 bedroom. Would there be a substantial price difference? Would greatly appreciate your feedback.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...