Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I feel that people are focusing too much on the OPs property being a council house and putting responsibility on the council to resolve this.   imagine for a moment that the OPs house is privately owned, now what powers would they have to take action on the trees? Pretty much none without taking the tree owner to court right. Well as the trees are privately owned, that is the same power that the council have right now.   the information with the £375 will be inline with high hedges legislation as this will be the only power the council will have and it is common for there to be a charge for this.   this is not a social housing issue, but a neighbor dispute with a private homeowner.   i used to work as a tree officer for a local authority and from experience have seen that people’s idea of dangerous and what is actually dangerous are two different issues. A councils power to enforce tree works are also limited and will usually only be where a private tree poses a risk to the highway, not to another property as that is a civil matter (even where the council own the 2nd property).    With regards to risk to underground pipes, this is something you will be unlikely to successfully argue as various studies have found that unless a tree is planted on top of the pipe and crush it, the roots will not cause damage, but rather only enter through already damaged areas as they are opportunistic, any tree roots in drains are usually a secondary issue where a pipe had existing damage and to resolve it will require a permanent repair to the pipe to prevent recurrence.   the only options i see here are to calculate the height allowed under high hedges legislation (it varies depending on what direction the property faces , the location of hedges etc) and try to enforce that which will involve the fee. Otherwise there is little you can do as the private homeowner has a right to have trees in their garden although they may be liable if they were to cause damage to your property (such as a shed) or the councils property in the future.
    • Served on 16 Feb.   On reviewing the MCOL website today for an updated, I noticed that 1) Hermes has aknowledged the claim, but not yet filed a defence, and 2) that I there was a glitch / error on the form. Essentially, it looks like I had accidentally left the "I will send detailed particulars of claim" box ticke (I thought I had unticked it), with the result that the claim section has been truncated, and some extra text has automatcially been added - in red below):   "...Claimant seeks £XXX, plus I will provide the defendant with separate detailed particulars within 14 days after service of the claim form. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of..."   This is obviously not ideal. Is it better to try to amend the claim somehow, or to just submit a brief POC that a) clarifies that I am seeking £XXX plus costs (which was automatically truncated), and b) sets out my calculation of the £XXX?  
    • Hi   It amazes me how they pass the buck as they don't want to deal with a private homeowner but if the shoe was on the other foot they would be hammering down on you for breach of tenancy.   As this is council housing you need to make a Formal Complaint in writing to the Council Housing about this (as a social housing landlord they have a complaints process they have to follow). you need to exhaust their complaints process. Make sure and title your letter Formal Complaint.   From what you have posted this tree is not just a nuisance but also a Health & Safety risk:   1. The tree being overgrown is now a danger to the occupants/Guest/Visitors to your property   2. The tree has overgrown into the Council Housings Boundaries your property causing damage/endangerment to the occupants/guest/visitors.   3. As the roots of the tree are also overgrown into your property you have concerns that these may be causing/damaging to any underground pipework that may be within the boundray of the property.   4. So far the Councils actions have been to treat their Council Housing tenant as a third class citizen with a private homeowner aloud to cause endangerment/possible damage due to these overgrown trees which are encroaching on your council house property/bounderies.   You also require clarification why you were sent the Healthy Neighbourhood Information which states I have to pay £375 to make a complaint. (make sure and attach a copy of the response that states this cost)   You also require copies of the following:   1. Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Customer Service Standard (not the leaflet) 3. Health & Safety Policy (not the leaflet) 4. Public Liability Insurance Policy. (not the leaflet) 5. Clarification from you if their is any underground pipeworks running through the bounderies within the garden area (you should have full knowledge of this it being your property/plans) 6. Compensation Policy (not the leaaflet) 7. Equality & Diversity Policy (not the leaflet)   When you get the above policies sit with a pen/pencil/highlighter and take you time reading them and just think to yourself 'DID THEY DO THAT' if not mark it then leave it for a while then do the same again this way you can basically throw/write back stating the haven't followed x policy with which part of that policy and your reason. (you are building evidence to use against them using their own policies. I would also like to refer you to The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provision) Act 1976: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1976/57/part/I/crossheading/dangerous-trees-and-excavations     You need to remember yes it is the Council but the Council Housing is a separate entity and is a Registered Social Landlord (RSL)   Is the Council Housing classed as a registered Charity? (what is their registration number whether charity or RSL?)   Also have a wee look at this CAG link:     
    • @rocky_sharma   Fame at last!!   Dunno how much help it would be in your case, but I could try digging out the txt of my defence if you think it might be relevant to your defence. We might hafta do this via PM, then e-mail though if ya wanna go down that route.   Good luck with yours anyway mate.
  • Our picks

freakyleaky

H.O.L Test case appeal. Judgement Declared. ***See Announcements***

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3503 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Should we not encourage a boycott (or a run) on the 8 banks that have appealed?

 

Would this not be sending the message home even harder that consumers are completely ****ed off with them?

 

It may even make them think twice if only the banks that are appealling have money withdrawn from them at a time when most are asking for shareholder money.


If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i can't wait for the sale of my house. once the money is in the bank. im going down there to setup savings accounts the lot. once they are ready to set it all up. im pulling all my money and moving it to premium bonds. £30k the rest im spending on a business. the banks will lose £45k in one day from me. all because they didn';t want to help me when i needed it.

 

so yes a run on the banks will be a good call. i say get it setup, how many of us on here. even if half of us done it. that would be enough to send shock waves.

 

im fedup of being conned by people in power that we intrust our money to.

 

the OFT need to sort there backyard out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so, dave. Although the concept is good, a run on a clearing bank could devistate the economy. I DO think that once the declaration is handed down in July, if the financial ombudsman service continues to refuse to deal with complaints a judicial review is in order.

 

n.b. that might be hypocritical, because I barely use banks myself... haven't had a bank account for five years, or had any credit except a credit card with a limit of £700 for four years, only thing I use banks for is getting my money and then taking it out the next day.


i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I think the ecomony is devastated already.

 

A run on the 8 banks damaging the already damaged economy can only be a good thing.

 

It should force even a limp-wristed government like this one to wake up and regulate an industry of cowboys properly rather than letting them run renegade on the whole of society.


If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...A run on the 8 banks damaging the already damaged economy can only be a good thing...
Some peeps pensions which they have scrimped + scraped ALL their working lives to acrue, would be devasted...:Cry:

If such action were to be advocated, perhaps it should be limited to one at a time, until the other Banks saw sense...;)

The threat to force the de-mutualisation of the Nationwide B.S. would be MY choice to start with...:)

...They have NO external shareholders to provide dividends for + so have NO excuse for their behaviour re: unlawful Penalty Charges...:mad:


The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men.

Blessed is he who in the name of charity and goodwill shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children.

And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers.

And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

(Jules Winnfield)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally, I think the ecomony is devastated already.

 

A run on the 8 banks damaging the already damaged economy can only be a good thing.

 

It should force even a limp-wristed government like this one to wake up and regulate an industry of cowboys properly rather than letting them run renegade on the whole of society.

 

 

This site has done a lot of good work bringing the charges debate into the public domain - however the above comment is very inflamitory and in my view short-sited. If the banks do not fund say for example building of houses /shoppng centres/offices - there would be thousands out of work - from builders to architects etc etc

 

Then there would be even more pain in the economy than there is already.

 

the whole point of the argument about charges was regarding legalities and that is how the fight should continue.

 

Please look at the bigger picture

 

there are other campaigns I am sure the site can work on while the final decisions are being made


Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it does matter who's given credit

 

Budgie has put a great deal of time & effort into this & it's only right they be given credit. Anyone passing off someones else's endeavours, even inadvertently, as their own is open to criticism & charges of plagiarism

 

 

thanks for that as well - would have tipped your scales - but apparently I am not allowed to .

 

Hope the comment by MTM will not stop the posts!


Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Hope the comment by MTM will not stop the posts!
:confused::confused::-?

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men.

Blessed is he who in the name of charity and goodwill shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children.

And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers.

And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

(Jules Winnfield)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally, I think the ecomony is devastated already.

 

You're entitled to your opinion, but despite the gloomy nature of the press, as a country we are currently almost as affluent as we've been at any point in our history... although it's precarious, and we are suffering compared to a few years ago...

 

I'm talking about the things that happen in countries were the s**t really hits the fan... like 1929, where people can't afford to feed themselves... like it is in zimbabwe, which shows you how quickly a prosperous nation can decline into abject poverty.

 

Bottom line is, what I think CAG has always stood for is making sure the consumer gets a fair deal... and we owe that to you... but we don't need to destroy the banks to do that. All we want is fair treatment. That means the banks should be allowed to make a reasonable profit, without forcing the poorest people in society into poverty.

  • Haha 1

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to MTM

 

Sounded like you said it does not matter who the posts came from about the case conference - but it does.

 

People have taken the time to attend and report and despite the way the other forum is critisised on here have given permission for them to be posted.

 

also if you dont agree with some of the comments /reporting you will know who to blame;)

 

bolshie

  • Haha 1

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

instead of a run on the banks - how about concentrating on all the hardship cases that the banks should have "filtered through" rather than dealing with in court anyway?They are abusing the terms of the waiver and personally I think the FOS should be helping out more with this.

 

They are the ones most in need

 

there have been some successes in this area even recently -

The judge seemed to want to get pending cases dealt with ASAP - but his hands may be tied by the appeal - we have yet to see? dont forget another day tomorrow and more news in July

 

keep moving on other cases in the mean-time


Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm talking about the things that happen in countries were the s**t really hits the fan... like 1929, where people can't afford to feed themselves...

 

It's almost like that now.

 

High bills, soaring food prices and extortionate petrol is definately hitting people in the pocket.

 

Then we get US consumers complaining about 'gas' being $4.00 a gallon (£2) and burgers being smaller than the size of a house!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...Sounded like you said it does not matter who the posts came from about the case conference - but it does.

Au contraire ma petite banniere rouge...;)

 

I was concerned NOT about the source (...a single small reference would have sufficed methinks), but about the time taken for the info to appear.

 

No doubt, the info appears in full on LB anyway...:rolleyes:

 

FWIW...I have no personal axe to grind with LB at all, there are many capable + knowledgeable peeps who regulary Post there, as well as on other websites.

...I am just wanting justice/help for ALL the 'little peeps'.

 

As CAG is a major first port of call for NEWBIES, it would make sense to help them learn to navigate this torrid sea that we are forced to sail.

Then once they have gained their 'sea legs'...what they do is up to them.

 

 

...:)


The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men.

Blessed is he who in the name of charity and goodwill shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children.

And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers.

And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

(Jules Winnfield)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fine

 

lets draw a line under that one .

 

and see what happens tomorrow.


Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

extortionate petrol is definately hitting people in the pocket

that could be controlled at the drop of a hat it is speculators who are buying vast quantities uknown faces it is a possibility opec and goverments might halt the speculation but they know india and china have a large hand in all this as well and everyone is afraid to rock their boats ? this is my opinion and it counts for nothing but who cares lol

patrickq1


http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by patrickq1 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MTM, I agree, de-mutulisation would be a very good threat. How do you go about doing that?

 

Also, I'm only talking about boycotting the 8 banks that bought about the appeal.

 

There are hundreds of other banks that would welcome our business (well, yours, there is no way on earth I am ever having a bank account again), and THEY can be the ones to invest for a change.

 

I can't see having a boycott of the 8 main offenders having an effect on the economy.


If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This might be useful for the newbies.

 

Unfair Terms in Contracts With Consumers Quick Facts - BERR

 

It tells you want an unfair term is.


"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
extortionate petrol is definately hitting people in the pocket

that could be controlled at the drop of a hat it is speculators who are buying vast quantities uknown faces it is a possibility opec and goverments might halt the speculation but they know india and china have a large hand in all this as well and everyone is afraid to rock their boats ? this is my opinion and it counts for nothing but who cares lol

patrickq1

 

I agree, perhaps off topic though. The time has come for the gloves to come off with regards to petrol, but that's another story.


If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally, I think the ecomony is devastated already.

 

A run on the 8 banks damaging the already damaged economy can only be a good thing.

 

It should force even a limp-wristed government like this one to wake up and regulate an industry of cowboys properly rather than letting them run renegade on the whole of society.

 

 

I agree:p


"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MTM, I agree, de-mutulisation would be a very good threat. How do you go about doing that?

 

Also, I'm only talking about boycotting the 8 banks that bought about the appeal.

 

There are hundreds of other banks that would welcome our business (well, yours, there is no way on earth I am ever having a bank account again), and THEY can be the ones to invest for a change.

 

I can't see having a boycott of the 8 main offenders having an effect on the economy.

 

I agree!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am off !

 

thought the fight would continue - but in ways that might be effective - not this


Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fight continues on many fronts


"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I suppose we could all sit about and talk about it - do nothing and leave it up to the OFT, FSA or whoever, whilst simultaneously having our hands tied behinds our back with regards to taking action through the courts - it might only take about 3-4 years that way after all.

 

That's not a problem though - people at the bottom of society's pile being stuffed some more for a few more years won't hurt.

 

Do you remember how hard it was having 40-60% of your wages taken off you each month in charges?

 

I do. I didn't like it much. I don't suppose anyone does.

 

But now, with a stay in place on any recourse to get it stopped, and let's face it, they're not really playing fair anymore, we're to sit back and let them lend irresponsibly, take money that doesn't belong to them and do 'credit checks' on people when no credit is applied for.

 

Personally, and this is not the opinion of CAG, just my opinion: The gloves have come off - at a time when the banking industry's image is at rock bottom they go and pull a stunt like this, knowing full well that an appeal will take years, and knowing full well who is paying the charges, just so collectively they can fleece those who can least afford it another 4-6 billion.

 

No, if the powers that be won't do the job they are supposed to and protect us from this sort of behaviour, then we have to do something about it.

 

Talk is cheap.


If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MTM, I agree, de-mutulisation would be a very good threat. How do you go about doing that?
Board Members are elected by Members of the Building Society.

Anyone who has an account with the Nationwide is entitled to cast their vote for whoever is standing for election.

(...apparently it's called Democracy??...:rolleyes:)

 

However...

 

To deter 'Carpetbaggers' + prevent what has happened with other 'get-rich-quick' building society de-mutualisations, ALL NEW account holders, as a condition of acceptance, have to sign away any right that they personally may have to any proceeds from a de-mutualisation, the monies instead going to a Charity that Nationwide has set up.

 

This has previously negated ANY candidates, to MY knowledge, standing for a position on the Board on a de-mutualisation ticket.

 

The following Thread gives a more accurate viewpoint of Nationwide's current attitude to those Members who may have temporarily fell on hard times...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgages-secured-loans/145565-nationwide-tightens-its-lending.html

 

 

...:(


The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men.

Blessed is he who in the name of charity and goodwill shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children.

And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers.

And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

(Jules Winnfield)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Talk is cheap."

 

that depends on whats being said and who says it.

 

Freedom of speech is something we should cherish a lot of countries dont have it .


Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...