Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks very much Bank. I have topped and tailed my LOC and printed off a copy which I shall post tomorrow by First Class post at my local post office and also obtain a proof of postage. I'll also email them a copy. I've opened a MoneyClaim account, and shall now begin work on my draft Particulars of Claim which I shall post here for your thoughts. And I shan't be using the Moderation service.
    • Yes, it struck me this morning that I'd got it wrong    - no involvement of UKPPO in any previous Tesco thread    - there would have been an entrance sign to a Tesco car park    - CCTV isn't something associated with Tesco car parks. Presumably whoever runs the car park has put CCTV at the electric, and probably BB, areas, done absolutely nothing to stop abuse, and then rubs their hands in glee every time the CCTV catches a motorist out. You can pay £60 and this will go away. Or you can defy UKPPO and rely on their non-respect of POFA, consideration period, etc., should they be daft enough to do court later down the line.  We would support you all the way.
    • thats not the way to do it sorry. sorry so what is your problem? that vanquis paid the £560 or that they are now chasing it? how old is this debt? dx  
    • If you visited Qatar you could be detained at the border, if the debt has been notified.  If you are only in transit and do not seek to cross border into Qatar you might be ok, but you may want to seek formal advice about this.
    • Howdy, I had a short lived credit card with Vanquis that I did not need. I paid it off in full and called them and closed it with the person at the other end. 2 months later they started sending me messages about late payments, I called them and to find out that the card had not been closed in error and 6 weeks after it should have been closed they paid a google debit of £560. I hit the roof and made a formal complaint that took them well over a month to respond to. They agreed they were at fault, refunded all late payments fees and offered me £100 in compensation. However they said the debit amount stood as 'I had benefit from it' and I should get a refund from google. I hit the roof again but they have stuck to their guns. The debit from google is a genuine one but I wanted to dispute it with google so closed the card so they would have to engage with me. But surely that's neither here nor there surely? What is the next step? Ombudsman takes forever doesn't it?  thanks in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

M1PLG v Lloyds cc


Tonka99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3950 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi M1. Can you please edit the image of the agreement and delete the account number at the top right of the doc? It could identify you.

 

I'll draw attention to your thread from some CCA specialists.:)

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doc'ts appear for me so I'll now ask for opinion on them.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asked for opinion again - hopefully links will work ok.

 

May have to wait till tomorrow now, unless Rory is prowling late ;)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick

you really are a star ,

i have put up new mbna loan thread which also needs a look ,

plus one for Mackays which Steven4064 has looked at it is strange hoping he can advise there .

many thanks again

 

cheers M1

 

ps can i pm you sometime so i can explain a few things ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll nudge it again but please be patient - the debt bods have a huge workload and your doc'ts have added to it a fair bit !!:eek: LoL

 

PM by all means if you wish.:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Slick

will shut up and go to bed now . busy weekend ahead really do think the support on this site is fantastic , no more docs to post up for a while , Mbna have not returned three requests only the loan one , sorry to be a pain, please thank all the guys for me .icon14.gif

 

cheers for now

M1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello M1!

 

I've had a quick look, as requested.

 

I think it's best to wait for someone more experienced to comment. But first glance seems to suggest it has not been executed by the Lender.

 

The first is an Application Form, so if that was all they sent, it doesn't look Enforceable.

 

However, there does appear to be some Prescribed Terms on the 2nd Page, but the two Pages do not seem to be linked. The First has a lot of References around the edges, whereas the 2nd is somewhat different...a plain Page with nothing much to link it to the first that I can see.

 

There do appear to be two sets of Fold Marks on both, or lines that could be Fold Marks, which may suggest both Pages were folded twice to fit into, say, an Envelope.

 

See if these line up on your Copies there.

 

These are just my first impressions. I'll have a closer look Tomorrow, in the cold light of day!

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the prescribed terms are not in the signature document that is for certain.nor is the document headed as required by the Consumer Credit Agreement Regs 1983 schedule 1

 

 

now turning our attention to the T&Cs which the signature document claim are over leaf

 

 

looking at the credit limit, it says "Credit Limit see also 5" Now i must be missing something because there is no 5

 

so it seems that there is some missing information, personally i feel this is open to challenge as i do not feel it is compliant at all, they would need to prove that the T&Cs were attached to the rear of the application if they couldnt then i would say they were royally stuffed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All!

 

Yep, pt2537 is spot on, although they mention a Section 5, there's no sign of a Section 5 on the back at all. Well spotted.

 

Also, the Fold Marks that I mentioned, these may not be important, as they could also be the ones added when they sent this to you, i.e. actual Physical Fold Marks in your own Copy that your own Scanner picked up.

 

However, if they look like they are not recent Physical Fold Marks added to your own Copy, but ones Printed onto your Copy by Lloyds when they Photocopied the Original Document(s) [note the potential plural], then examining them further may be worth coming back to later.

 

For example, if you need additional ammunition to bring into question if these two Pages were ever part of the same Document.

 

This is nit picking, but if they don't have the Original, and have simply merged two documents into one from two arguably unrelated Copies, then letting them know you know this at an early stage means they will know that little bluff is going to be called.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all

 

Udate for this one

 

Have had a letter from Solicitors Sechiarl, Clark,& Mitchell

http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn99/sexeysarms/solictiorsletterlloydscc.jpg

 

I have done nothing with this one as yet, still unclear as to what the next

move should be as the cca is considered to be a bit iffy.

 

Any advice guys ,

Im begining to get a bit nervous now so many on to one :eek:

 

many thanks to all who have looked

 

cheers

T99

Link to post
Share on other sites

hang on those so called t & c are for people converting existing balances

 

it also says bank copy so if those t & c were on the back of an application gform there would be no need to say bank copy !!!!

 

it also says these are some of the legal conditions for our classic gold and platinum credit cards . the full conditions are set out in the section headed lloyds tsb classic gold and platinum card terms & Conditions

 

isn't it a coincidence that section 4 is exactly at the top of column 2 (cut and paste)

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello FC

 

Thanks for looking , as BRW says more eyes the better , can you advise

as to the next step , I have so many on the go at the moment .

Had a choice get some charges ppi ect back or go B/R:eek: have made

my choice , these banks just put you further and deeper in the s**t

so now I feel its payback time , on saying that i really need and am getting lots of help, but am NOT very confident or know how to proceed

further so any advice is very welcome

many thanks for your time

regards T99

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello T99!

 

It's a tough call, but that Agreement looks dubious for all the reasons mentioned so far. The main ones being that the 2nd Page does not seem to relate to the first. Apart from anything else, the 2nd Page looks amazingly badly set out from an Artwork/Type-Setting point of view...looks thrown together.

 

To take you to Court and Enforce this, they are going to need to produce the Original. That will have to be a single sheet with two-sides, one Signed by you, and the other containing all the Prescribed Terms on the back of it.

 

That, to me, is the big question. Have they really got such a Document?

 

The thing I would do now while thinking about the next move (or lack of it, your next move could be to let them take the next move) is to trawl through any Statements that you do have, and see if there are any Penalty Charges that you can Dispute and Claim back. IOW, start planning to Dispute any Figures they are claiming from you, and make it clear that if they take you to Court, they must also be prepared to explain the Validity of those Charges.

 

Likewise PPI. Do you have the PPI Terms and Conditions, and if so, what is the wording for Self-Employed Cover...if any?

 

If no Statements and no PPI Terms, then it could be wise to pay £10 and send them a Subject Access Request. But, as time is getting tight, to stop them messing around and dragging the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) out, I would ask them specifically for anything you may need in the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). Say you want all Statements and you want the PPI Terms.

 

The reason for this, is if you can Dispute the alleged Debt figures, you may be able to Dispute the Default if it was based on a Total that was itself made up of Penalty Charges and potentially mis-Sold PPI.

 

After that, I'm running low on the experience needed to help, so hopefully PT2537 and others will come in next to advise on what to do.

 

It may be that you should do nothing directly, and just wait for them to take the next action. Build your Defence, and see what they do.

 

Even if they issue Court Papers, that could be just a strategy to try and make you Pay. If they do not have the Original Copy of a two-sided Agreement, and you make it clear that it must be Produced, they may either not turn up, or pull out ahead of Court.

 

Or their next move could be to Sell the alleged Debt to a Debt Collecting Agency (DCA). That could tell you something!

 

If a DCA does appear, then hit them with a Letter that says you do not acknowledge any Debt to their Company, the alleged Debt is in Dispute and should not therefore have been Sold to them, please produce details of the alleged Agreement they are relying upon to Enforce the alleged Debt, please produce details of the Assignment from the Original Creditor to them and, while you are at it, throw in a Telephone Harassment Warning with the No Visits Paragraph for good measure.

 

It may be worth sending any DCA that does appear £1 and a CCA Request all of their own. They would have 12 Working Days to produce that.

 

Finally, if that Agreement really is suspect, then you could argue that it's not Enforceable so they no longer have your Authority to process your Data. You can then consider going back to try and get the Default removed, plus get any nasty notes left on your Credit File removed as well.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

;-)Hello BRW

 

As usual you are keeping an eye on me it gives me hope ;-);-):wink:

What you say is probably the best way to go ,SAR tomorrow outline

what is needed .We bank with these s*** and have sent a cca of

for oh had statements back already they have taken from oh bank

account every time we were late with a payment but only after

we paid so lots of double payments and since we have been here

around 15mths we have not had any statements at all. then demands

for payment so we paid up and guess what they took £220.00 out of his

account the same day again . well thats another story for another day.

Im getting a lot worried at the moment seems like my luck is running

out and im not doing anything do realise that it is a stalling game

just wish I knew all this years ago , unfortunatly as you know when

you have a business you are too busy working and miss lots of the

important things .

well lets hope for better things soon

 

thanks again T99

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello T99!

 

Just keep your chin up, and keep all of these issues in order.

 

Use Files, a Sheet of A3 on a Wall, what ever it takes, keep each one organised, and you will gradually plot your best way through all of this.

 

The Threads on CAG could well also be a sensible place to keep your main thoughts Listed out and ordered into the applicable Thread.

 

If you have a Spreadsheet Application on your Computer, they can be great to use as a Diary. You can colour in the Cells to keep track, and set it out with Days of the Week, Month etc, and change colours if things go well, average or bad, and then concentate on the one that is giving you the most grief.

 

One thing I will say, don't be tempted to borrow via Mortgage to pay off Credit Cards. Never used Secured Debt to Pay-Off Unsecured Debt.

 

All you will do is move the Debt from someone who can't easily take your Home, to someone that can!

 

Best plan at the moment is to do as you have done, and keep them all lined up via the CAG Threads, and keep things ordered.

 

People here will help you to organise your thoughts as things come up. No matter how bad it looks, we'll all do our best to spot solutions to try and turn it around until it looks better.

 

The Loan issue is still looking good, I still think the Signature Dates and Cancellation issues could prove a significant issue in your favour. It's quite possible that the Agreement is not Enforceable if I'm right. So far, the consensus is that I'm not wrong, and could be right.

 

Don't let these b***ards grind you down.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello BRW

 

hope your ok

 

I have been busy getting SAR,s off today spent a fortune at the

PO.:eek:

 

The phone has been ringing from our friends at Chester Towers think

I spoke to soon they have been too quite for too long , now i fear

i may need to borrow your gun.

Have got the staff to log the calls now , nothing in the post today

 

cheers T99

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...