Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS / Virgin One Account - withdraw interest rate cuts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not sure if any of you have seen this (sorry if I'm repeating what has been put elsewhere) but sign up for the government petition (well, it might do some good?). It's a bit light on signatures at the moment so the more the merrier.

 

Petition to: ensure consistency and "fairplay" from RBS group in passing on the recent cut in base rate to their "One account" mortgage customers. | Number10.gov.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not sure if anyone has seen this but might be worth signing up to the below petition

Petition to: ensure consistency and "fairplay" from RBS group in passing on the recent cut in base rate to their "One account" mortgage customers. | Number10.gov.uk

 

Sorry if it's already been mentioned and you know about it.

 

Will let you know when/if I hear back from them about my letter. Think I'll also look into going to the FOS

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 3 main drivers that I am aware of in strategic decision making for interest rates – The base rate, Libor, and competition.

Discounting ‘crisis’ rises in rates pre September their rates have dropped by 2.95%

In this time:

1. The base rate has now been reduced by 4.5%

2. Libor has dropped from 6.3% to 1.9% (4.4%) – and this is still falling.

3. In terms of competition (including only ‘offset’ mortgages­) First Direct are currently offering 2.89% as a typical rate

Therefore they have no strategic base for what they are doing.

I really like the One Account but the difference in their rates and the First Direct rates would be worth around £1200 per annum to me. This is too high a price to pay.

I don’t care who owns them, I just want a fair deal and their recent actions are not fair or even logically sound.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a reply today from their "customer care team", regarding their letter in 1999 about moving in line with the base rate.

"We are aware that some years ago certain price promises were made to our customers around changes to the One Account rates following any change to interest rates set by the Bank of England. These promises did not reflect the mortgage terms and conditions, but were a genuine statement of our intentions at the time and we can only apologise if, as a result of these communications, you were ever led to believe that the rate would always track Bank of England Base rate"

They also confirmed (for the first time, as I've not had a letter from them ) that they'll be cutting the rate 0.25% from 1st April.

 

My concerns about Sir Fred's pension have also been noted :)

 

I feel another letting coming on...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

hi

I raised this with V1 in March 2007 (the reason given was that rates were driven by Libor, not Bank of England base rate) and I never followed it up. I rang V1 to complain about the rates not following Libor on 26 July, and was told it would be raised and I would get a written response. Nothing happened so I rang again today to chase. The agent said it was not a complaint, it was a 'dissatisfaction' (might have got the wrong word here but that's the gist), the previous agent I had spoken to had given me incorrect information, the policy is that interest rates are set by RBS, are not negotiable and 'it is how it is'. She repeatedly tried to put me through to the 'saves' team to find a 'more appropriate product' which I declined, as there are lots of other features of the account which I like and need. She said I would not get a written response as there was nothing they could do to change the situation.

So not much luck there! Anybody got any other updates?

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...