Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS / Virgin One Account - withdraw interest rate cuts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5342 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've had a Virgin One account mortgage for about ten years.

 

In the terms of the loan, the interest rate that I am being charged was guarenteed to follow the changes in the interest rate of the Bank of England.

 

Up until now, that has been the case. However this morning, for the first time, I received a letter from them saying that they will not be passing on the cut in the interest rate on this occasion. I have to say I am outraged at this.

 

Surely this is a breach of contract and they can't do it !

Has anyone else got the same letter, and feels the same way as me?

 

If so, what can we do about it, it's so unfair. Surely thay can't just change the rules because they're starting to feel the pinch.

 

regards

Cagpablo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think it is a breach of contract per se, most mortgages have a clause along those lines to be honest... however, it may be considered an unfair term if it is not exercised for good reasons. Worth goint to a soliciter, maybe?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all,

 

Just an update, I'm choking on my Cornflakes with the latest turn of events.

 

I don't believe it. I have written to the bank for an explanation of how they can manipulate the interest rates after agreeing to move them in line with the Bank of England's. But before I even got a reply they'd written to me to say they are going to increase the interest rate again by another quarter point.

 

I have now had their reply and they have said:

"We are also aware that some years ago certain price promises were made to our customers around changes to the Virgin One Account rates following any change to interest rates set by the Bank of England. These promises did not reflect the mortgage terms and conditions, but were a genuine statement of our intentions at the time, and we can only apoplogise if, as a result of the communications, you were ever led to believe that the rate would always track the Bank of England Base Rate."

 

Well forgive me, but "these promises did not reflect the mortgage terms and conditions" sounds like a pretty clear case of mis selling or mis leading to me.

 

I am surprised that other holders of Virgin One Accounts haven't posted to demonstrate their concerns too. It seems now that they've decided in for a penny in for a pound and they're accelerating up and away from the B of E base rate using the credit crunch as a scapegoat.

 

Are we expected to just roll over and take this? When I took my loan, it was a major selling point that the interest rate would be tied to the Bof E rate. It was something they proudly flaunted as it offered some sort of benchmark and security. They have clearly stated in their letter that they did promise to do this, so how can they then just decide to pull the rug on it ten years later.

 

Is there anything here that gives rise to a formal referral to the FSA or FOS for mis selling me and many others their mortgages?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

The .5% cut from earlier on will be applied to our Virgin One account mortgage from 1 November.

 

We got onto them about the rates going up earlier in the year and established that RBS which was the bank that backed the Virgin One Account (mortgage) had actually 'taken over' - nothing that we could do about it GRRRRRR. Tonight I sw

aw that RBS has announced that it will be passing the full 1.5% cut to its mortgage rates from 1 December - so they're trousering a pretty hefty wedge this month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I can't offer useful advice or info about why this is. It is now fully 5 days after BofE reduced rates to 3% and there is STILL an automated message on their phone line saying they are "reviewing" the interest rate. I am as enraged as no doubt every other One Account customer, not just at the prevarication here (clearly they are trying to find ways of justifying NOT passing on the rate cut), but at the shere arrogance. We have only just recently bailed out this bank to the tune of billions, while Virgin have consistently had a higher rate than almost all the major lenders, their justifcation being that it is an offset mortgage. (Hello, so is almost every other product these days as in you can make overpayments whenever you want).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also pretty discusted with the way RBS is responding. It simply updates the phone message every day to say it is still reviewing.

I have sent an email to Alistair Darling [email protected] telling him the bank has misled him over the action they were promising to take over the BoE interest rate cut. We do have a varaible rate mortgage with RBS, whether they like it or not, and we know that they promised Darling last friday that they would bring down their variable rates by the same amount.

I suggest we try and get as many people as possible to email the chancellor in the same vein.

I also spent a long long time on the phone trying to talk my way up the tree in RBS, but got nowhere, except an admission that they were being inundated with calls of complaint and the customer base "was not happy". I think the only way is to keep piling the pressure on them by whichever way you can until they realise the groundswell that is there. No business, even banks, like it when their customers start to hate them. Anyone know any financial editors on nationals who may pick this story up?

I also note that the NatWest "One Account" is no longer being offered to new customers and on the Virgin One as was website they quote a rate of 6.2% vs a typical market rate of 6.5%.

I have been a customer now for 11 years and I have persuaded at least 6 of my friends to join the bank over that time. RBS will certainly have to change their ways before I persuade anyone else to join.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've previously done the One Account favours by telling people how happy I was with the service. I'm sure they have had good business due to us. Like people here though I feel like they are breaking a promise with regards to the tracking the base rate.

 

I'm going to join the crowds and write to them tomorrow to demand my 1.5% cut and express my willingness to move mortgages. Maybe a letter explaining that I believe them to be in continuing breach of contract will at least get a proper letter of explanation from them.

 

I've considered for a while asking the dozen people I know with the One Account if they want to sign up to say cut it or lose us. In total a couple of million in business should be more of a factor for them than just one or two grumbles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anything we can do to get V1 to pass on the rate cuts. As of today they are still dithering.

 

RBS have passed on the rate cut why can't V1.

 

We are all paying 2% higher than we should be, that amounts to about £266 per month in my case.

 

I joined in the begining and was PROMISED rate changes would be passed on the next day, its all very well them saying that it was not in their terms and conditions, i think they need to look up the meaning or the word Promise! Con more like it.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received the following from V1:

 

The One Account is a variable rate product and does not track or never has tracked the Bank of England Base Rate, nor is it linked to either the RBS or NatWest Standard Variable Rates. We use any changes in the Bank of England base rate to review One Account interest rates and I appreciate that you believe we should make a decision more quickly. In setting interest rates, we consider a wide range of factors including the cost of funding variable rate mortgages, which is currently significantly higher than the Bank of England Base Rate. At this time our interest rates remain under review and I have no further information, but I can assure you we will communicate any changes in line with the Terms and Conditions of your account.
I really think that the ombudsman should get involved here; what do people think?
Link to post
Share on other sites

"does not track or never has tracked the Bank of England Base Rate"

 

Have I missed something over the last 10 years, but it always has tracked the Bank of England Base Rate.

 

Something needs to be done.... As soon as the markets stabilise I am OFF!!

 

This product is no longer viable and will die (maybe that’s what they want)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt they will weasel out of their obligations (to keep the rate tracked), and I haven't studied the V1 T&Cs small print enough to be able to challenge them on it. I expect they are gambling on not many of their customers having the time/energy etc to move their mortgage in these times, so feel they have got us over a barrel. I am disgusted at the insulting way they keep updating their recorded message saying they are "reviewing" their rates. They could at least have the balls to admit they haven't the slightest intention of lowering their rates, unless they get forced to do so. I personally would move my mortgage in a flash but can't right now, so despite the fact we taxpayers have all just bailed them out, we go on paying - in my case - over £100 a month over the odds. That's their way of saying Thank You. I will never forgive or forget this, and if anybody has any practical suggestions on what else we can do, speak up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the fixed facility or gap between balance and facility leaves RBS open to massive negetive equity problems and they know it. Anyone in financial difficulty who kept a fixed facility will be able to draw back up to the level they agreed in much more prosperous times. They are deperate for some to move. My advice if you can go and get a lower rate mortgage do so, unless you need that facilty as a backup.

 

If like me you can't move, my household income has dropped since taking out the mortgage then we need to need to make noise that they are ripping us off. But who to? I guess the goverment now as they own it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a fallacy to think RBS is exposed to additional negative equity risk on account of the ability to increase borrowing at any time to the account limit. If you run your One account at the limit all the time, you simply have a conventional mortgage. If you are below your limit, you are ahead on payments compared to a conventional mortgage. A One Account is never more exposed to negative equity than the equivalent conventional mortgage.

 

Because the graduated interest rate applies to the whole loan, the true interest rate on the top slice of the facility is very high. In fact if you have a 95% facility, you are effectively paying unsecured credit card rates on the top 5%. So RBS is well paid for its risk.

 

I think what RBS is afraid of is large numbers of One Account holders maxing out their loans at short notice in response to a future political / economic event, requiring more than normal liquidity.

 

I am one of the ones who took the mortgage immediately it was available and received the letter promising to track base rate, and it has been a wonderful tool for managing through financial difficulties such as redundancy.

 

At the very least it should be tracking Libor, since that is what determines RBS costs, even if RBS break their promise on BOE rate tracking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well finally today the OneAccount has reduced its interest rate by 1% - the issue now is that the reduction is not the 1.5% passed on by many of the other banks.

I suspect the point made by Sleepyg that RBS are worried that a percentage of account holders hit by the credit crunch may decide to utilise their full borrowing facility - causing a run on required funds. So limiting the reduction to 1% may discourage people from doing so.

Whatever the justification for the way RBS is behaving, there is something strange about the way the OneAccount has been run since it was purchased from Virgin.

I was also intrigued by a statement from one of the (very helpful) staff at my local RBS branch. She commented that RBS "...simply act as the clearing bank for the OneAccount" & that is why whenever I go into my branch a member of staff tries to get me consider moving from the "OneAccount" offset mortgage to the RBS Offset mortgage ! When I ask what the difference is between 2 offset mortgages both apparently from RBS/NatWest, no-one has an answer.

Call me suspicious but I sense that the OneAccount has some form of commercial independence from RBS/NatWest (perhaps the OneAccount is a joint venture over which RBS has limited control or perhaps there were certain restrictions placed on the OneAccount when it was sold on by Virgin ?). Either way, RBS branches certainly seem keen to encourage OneAccount holders to move their business to the "RBS Offset" offering.

I am awaiting a call back from the Mortgage Advisor in my local branch so I can find out how the interest rates compare between the 2 accounts & if RBS applied the full 1.5% reduction to their own branded offset mortgage as a further encouragement for OneAccount holders to move their business ?

If anyone can shed any light on the "ownership/relationship" question between the OneAccount offering & the RBS offering I would be very interested.

... GP2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a disgrace that RBS Group have headlines about reducing by a full 1.5% all variable rate deals, and yet The One account got 1%. Come on Stephen Hester, do the decent thing and put the full 1.5% cut. Disappointing.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to our MP Rt Hon Kelvin Hopkins about this lot - what a waste of effor that was! My husband was whooping with delight when I got home from work tonight about this 'generous gift' I take the view that they owe us 1.5% for the last cut plus .5% for the October cut and that they have trousered nearly a months worth of 'reduction't that should have been passed back to us. RBS are the bank backing this and as we own 60% of this bank now I reckon they 'jumped before they were pushed'.

 

Incidentally one of the chaps on Virgin One account account management team told us that he was also praying for them to get their a**es in gear as he too had a mortgage with them and the pips were squeaking!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all - and thanks for your very helpful threads. I believe we have got 1% in no small part due to this forum and the pressue we have been putting on the bank and MPs. I also wrote to mine (what a waste of space they are, but that's another story). I was also intrigued to hear from a V1 manager that RBS doesn't own Virgin One in the conventional sense, that it is the "clearing bank". I have no idea what this means. Still massively disappointing that it is 1% and that it starts now (it should be backdated). I got letters from V1 in May and June 2004 saying that after BofE rate increase their rate was going up the same amount FROM MIDNIGHT TONIGHT!!! Who is the banking omudsman and how does one write to him/her?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Paddy, I have the same copies of cuts as well as raises of the interest rate. V1 always rose and cut rates as soon as the BoE raised or lowered theirs. I had a rate increase though this year with the first cut so they are still 1/4 percent up!!! :(

Ripped v Barclaycard - WON!!! :D

Ripped v MBNA - with FOS since Jan 08 with adjudicator ;)

 

I owe my attitude to Gene Hunt :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have the original written info stating that the One Account would track the base rate that they could scan and upload (or post to me and I'll do it and return it).

 

It would be difficult to make an official complaint without it; and I can't find my copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm new to this forum but, like a lot of other people it seems, I too am rather fed-up with RBS and the One Account interest rate scenario that is currently going on.

 

I've recommended friends and family to the One Account (and some of them have taken it up) and I've always been pleased with it. In fact, I still am - apart from this interest rate business.

 

I contacted them on 01 December to ask why they had not passed on the full 1.5% interest rate cut and received this reply:-

"Thank you for contacting us through our website. With effect from 1 December, interest rates on your flexible mortgage reduce by 1%. Your flexible mortgage is a variable rate product but is not linked to Bank of England Base rate or RBS/NW Standard Variable Rate. In deciding rates on flexible mortgages, we have had to consider a wide range of other factors in addition to the 1.5% Base Rate reduction, including market conditions and the cost of variable rate funding which is not linked to Bank of England Base Rate. If you have any further queries regarding this, or any other matter, please feel free to contact us via the online service or call us on 08456 000 000. We are here Monday to Sunday, 8am to 11pm. Kind regards...Virgin One account"

 

Looks like a standard canned response to me.

 

The Conditions booklet that I have, dated October 2001, states that the interest rate may change at any time but it does not say it is linked in any way to the BoE base rate. I have always held the impression that it is but I cannot find anything in writing to that effect.

 

We all receive the letters that state when interest rates change that "all One Account interest rates will decrease/increase by the same amount from midnight on *** insert date of letter here ***". That seemed to stop with the letter dated 14 April 2008, after a succession of interest rate rises and two reductions.

 

Basically the way they're treating customers really isn't good enough is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...