Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC/Restons/Charging Order - ***ORDER REMOVED***WON***


Satterthwaite
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4994 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My problem with HFC/Reston’s go back to August 2006 when they caught me at a particular low ebb coupled with not knowing what to do.

I was on a DMP with CCCS, I missed one payment which resulted in receiving a claim form issued at Northampton by Reston’s.

 

The default balance was £9913.78 but they also added a collection charge of £1652.62. Interest at £3225.74 then subtracted Post Refrl Cr at £827 which gave a total of £13965.14 then court fee and solicitors costs brought it to £14305.14.

To be honest I just ignored everything which resulted in a CCJ and then a charging order.

We received a letter 3 days before Christmas from Reston’s demanding payment in one week, of a new total of £14732.00 the trouble that this caused at home was horrendous. I did actually manage to get them to agree to let me carrying on the DMP.

 

It is only recently that I have started to tackle things and have been made aware of what can be done.

 

I have CCA’d HFC and what I received does not constitute an agreement.

I then followed this up with a SAR, all they sent was six years worth of statements, so I wrote back pointing out they had not fulfilled my request.

They wrote back requesting I send proof of my identity then they will action my request.

I thought this was ridiculous and told them so.

I sent a SAR to Reston’s, there reply was unequivocal, they did not have any agreements, statements or T&C’s and referred me back to HFC.

Because I want to try and sort this out without giving HFC any excuses I sent a SAR with ID to HFC.

After another reminder from me I finally received a bundle from HFC.

Curiously there was no copy of the “agreement” no default letter and no mention of Restons involvement.

 

If anybody could help with any advice on what I should do next and whether I have a chance of overturning the CCJ and CO which is ultimately what I hoping to do.

Thanks for reading.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, I would be very interested in the opinions of some of the experts on here regarding your question as I have a very similar situation where I was unable to deal with the mess I was in due to a breakdown. I now have a couple of charging orders going through and would like to know if its possible to treat a debt as unenforceable after the CCJ?

 

Thanks in advance.

FF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

Welcome to the forum, thanks for drawing this thread to my attention!

 

Restons seem to be a very aggressive creditor and I'm sorry to learn of the stress caused by their actions.

 

Regarding a possible CCJ set-aside one thing that instantly comes to mind is that the debt has a large collection charge applied to it. My guessing that their right to apply this charge may not actually exist within the original agreement and even if it did, it is likely to be unlawful (same argument as bank/credit card charges etc). I'm going to bring this thread to the attention of some of the other site-helpers/mods to see if we can offer further advice.

 

Best wishes,

 

Seq

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for such prompt attention, I really need to try and sort this out as it has caused a lot of problems at home.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they just add on all that interest?

 

I have just read this at nationaldebtline.co.uk

INTEREST

 

If the creditor has taken the debt to the county court, they may be able to add extra interest once a charging order is made. Interest cannot be added if:

  • the debt is for an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act. This includes most ordinary credit agreements, including bank overdrafts;

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a look round and found the answer to my question,

A collection charge is basically the original debt plus 16.3% to cover the expenses of passing it on to Restons,

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from the OFT debt collection guidelines.

 

2.9 >> Charges should not be levied unfairly

 

Examples of unfair practices are as follows

 

2.10a >> claiming collection costs from a debtor in the absense of express contractual or other legal provision

 

b >> misleading debtors into beleving they are legally liable to pay collection charges when this is not the case, e.g when there is no contractual provision

 

c >> not giving an indication in credit agreements of the amount of any charges payable on default

 

d >> applying unreasnable costs

 

e >> applying charges which are disproportionate to the main debt

 

I found this posted by sequenci.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never received a default notice.

I have had a look through everything that I have been sent by HFC as a result of my SAR and there is no copy of a default notice.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a look round and found the answer to my question,

A collection charge is basically the original debt plus 16.3% to cover the expenses of passing it on to Restons,

 

I can't view your agreement due to the fact that my PC blocks images at work. Is there any mention of this collection charge within the agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing on the so called agreement that refers to a collection charge,

It does refer to terms shown overleaf but i have never been given a copy of the reverse.

 

Also in the small print it refers to this being an application,

" I authorise you to obtain such information as you may require concerning statements made in this application"

 

They did send me a copy of terms and conditions effective from August 2006, my application was in 1993 and the default was registered 28/2/2005 so i do not see how they are relevant.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have gone through all the statements and there are total charges of £234 all though some of them date back longer than six years,

Can I still refer to the ones over 6 years as part of my claim to overturn the CCJ?

Also can I claim interest.

Thanks

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

O K I need to start to try moving this along,

 

reasons I see for overturning the CCJ in no particular order.

 

1) No CCA agreement

2) No Default notice.

3) £234 of Charges

4) Adding Collection Charge without an agreement

5) Adding interest without an agreement

 

If any body else has any ideas could they please post them

 

I am going to attempt to put something together over the weekend to put to my local court, N244?

 

Thanks

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi S

 

I'm in a similar situation to you regarding a HFC/Restons CCJ + CO just over a year ago (but still not made my application for a set-aside yet).

 

Regarding your points 1) and 2), in addition did they fail to send a LBA?

 

I'm thinking this could strengthen a possible argument that they brought the claim unlawfully (or is it illegally :confused:), as they were not entiled to do so having failed in those 3 points.

 

I look forward to seeing the details of your submission if you post it!

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...