Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I (and other respondents) always advise “not getting caught in a lie” it hardens their response. Why would they now believe protestations of remorse and “I won’t do it again” if they've already seen you'd lie and say it was a one-off when it wasn't..  You can try approaching the prosecutor on the day, but "I wouldn't hold my breath" …..  
    • I told them that it was an accident and that I used the oyster card as my debit card was lost. However, they did an investigation and realised it was not a one off. I have told them how remorseful I feel and how a criminal conviction would result in expulsion from my degree but they still want to take me to court. I have received the court summons letter
    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vehicle Finance issue


scaz40
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is my first post.

 

I entered into a 5 year Finance agreement with Fortis Lease for a vehicle in 2005. I recently requested a setlement figure and a copy of the loan agreement (moved house couldn't find it).

 

Upon inspection of the finance agreement I noticed the following:

  1. A Deposit was showing on the agreement, no deposit was paid by me to the dealer.
  2. The agreement states that it should have been signed at the dealers premises. The agreement was sent to me in the post and a no point did I visit the dealers premises.
  3. The delivery of the car happened after the first finance payment was due and the dealer recompensed me for this first initial payment.

Now I fully understand that this should have been picked up by me initially, however I fell into the trap of 'trusting' someone to work this through on my behalf and I should have checked the main terms of the agreement prior to signing it, however I was under pressure from my then employer to move from a company car to a car allowance. I enquired about this with a friend who mentioned something about antecedent negotiations, however I'm unsure whether this is applicable?

 

My question is, do I have any recourse against the Finance provider at all? The dealer has subsequently gone bankrupt and allegedly left a trail of these such issues behind him. Any advice would be gratefully received.

Rgds Paul:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, this is my first post.

My question is, do I have any recourse against theFinance provider at all? The dealer has subsequently gone bankrupt and allegedly left a trail of these such issues behind him. Any advice would be gratefully received.

It all depends what you hope to gain from it. None of the points you mention change the fact that you have had the agreement running for three years, presumably without problem. Are there any other issues with either the car or the agreement that make you dissatisfied?

 

In answer to the individual points you have made.

 

1. It could be that the dealer has added a deposit on the docuemnt because this is what the finance company expected. This is obviously wrong. Whether you have suffered a loss from this is another matter because assuming you do agree with the actual amount of credit, the amount repayable will be identical to that if there was no deposit showing. Because also the amount of any deposit counts directly towards your termination ficure (assuming it is a HP agreement) it could be argued that the dealer actually did you a fovour!!!

 

2. Signing an on-trade agreement at you home......again a very naughty action by the dealer. Your 'loss' here is that you were not given your statutory cooling off period that comes as standard with any off-trade agreement. As such the agreement is technically unenforceable. To counter this, however, it could be argued that you have clearly accepted the agreement having repaid it for the last 3 years and the finance co may be able to apply to the court to have it made enforceable.

 

3. If the dealer paid your first installment for you then all I can say is 'well done'!!

 

What sort of recourse did you have in mind. Do you want 'out' of the agreement or are you otherwise happy with it?

 

Hope this helps.

 

RR:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx for the info RR.

 

The issue had originally been raised approx two years ago. I sent various emails to the Finance company querying the agreement and the issues identified in my first post. The response is received was 'you signed the agreement'. I have to admit, I should have been more thorough. However, if I can prove that I flagged the issue and concerns with them early do you think it would help?:confused:

 

My main goal is to exit the agreement if possible and revert back to a company vehicle.

 

Rgds

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have already flagged the issue and they have not appeared interested then you may have to put the account into dispute over this and take it from there - possibly in court.

 

This may not be the best option however based on the reasons in my first post. A court could quite legitimately ask you why you are disputing it now when you have been paying it for 3 years.

 

Is it a HP agreement? If so the you should be past the point under which you can voluntarily terminate it. If its not a HP agreement, but the car still has value, it may be worth explaining your situation to the lender and seeing if they can come to an aceeptable arrangement to end the agreement early and take the car back.

 

If your credit rating is otherwise good then I would not advise that you just stop paying it as it could screw things up for when you next want a car, or indeed anything else, on credit.

 

HTH.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...