Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
    • 2. Is correct disregard 1. You must attend ad per the order 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5857 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have read thru many many posts but not come across this so far ... Today my wife had an intesting conversation with BH .. over the DLC .. she was "informed" that to make a claim again the DLC she wil have to pay a £100 excess ... so not only is she paying heavily over the odds for a single item insurance thats as flimsly as an old silk blouse but that there is also an exorbitant excess on it .. something that was never mentioned at the time of taking the policy out .. although they were fast enough to say our home insurance wouldnt cover the item .... is this legal of them or just another avoidance tactic from these high street cowboys

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. And welcome to CAG

 

Having heard a similar case recently, I dug out some copies of BrightHouse agreements I keep locked away safely in my BrightHouse vault! :o

 

Looks like you have come across something I wasn't fully aware of. Hidden deep within the miniscule text of their terms and conditions I found this:

 

Section C (Damage Liabilty Cover Terms and Conditions)

 

(a) In the event of theft of any of the goods, or if any of them is lost or damaged beyond economical repair – all amounts payable by you under the agreement in relation to the theft, loss or damage and to terminate the agreement in respect of the relevant goods (other than damages or other amounts payable for any breach by you of the agreement). This amount shall be paid by the insurers on your behalf direct to BrightHouse, who may request this payment on your behalf.

 

(b) In the event of other damage to any goods – the provision of: the services of a technician to repair the damage; or, (at the insurers’ option) a cash payment to be used solely to pay for the services of any technician so to repair the damage, the insurers making the cash payment direct to the relevant technician.

 

© You will be liable for the first £100 for each claim for laptop computers, the first £50 for each claim for video cameras, the first £30 for each claim for portable games consoles, the first £30 for each claim for portable DVD players, the first £20 for each claim for portable audio devices and the first £20 for each claim for mobile telephones.

 

Now then, this CERTAINLY is not explained to customers when they (have to) take this cover, and - I would think - any excess should be an integeral part of the policy overview, and certainly on the front page AND at the point of signature.

 

Therefore I will PM one of our insurance experts and ask them give this thread a look over on your behalf.

 

Stay tuned!

 

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick call to my "disillusioned" BrightHouse "snitch" revealed that only PORTABLE goods from BrightHouse are subject to a policy excess on Damage Liabilty Insurance. Suites, TVs, Cookers, Fridges, Beds etc are not.

 

Naturally, he reckons this is clearly explained to customers - but from my own personal experience (ie: having had a laptop computer from BrightHouse) I can confirm that, until now, I had no idea about this.

 

Something as important as a policy excess is no good hidden away in tiny terms and conditions on the back of the third page of an agreement - which, half the time, BrightHouse don't give you anyway!

 

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking a peek, HSBCrusher. Appreciated.

Hopefully the OP will clarify, but it looks like the item is a laptop computer.

But, should not an excess on a policy be CLEARLY stated BOTH in the terms and conditions AND at the point of sale? Should it not be part of the insurance schedual that the customer signs?

Surely it is not right to only find out there is an excess on a policy when you come to claim on it?

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i am pdoffs wife :) it was a laptop computer the circumstances were as follow, i have a disability which makes my back suffer with sever poain and i end up paralysed i had just walked into the sitting room with a nice glass of red wine to relax on the couch as was feeling a bit sore when my legs completely gave out and i collapsed and unfortunately the glass with the wine in flew and went all over the latop, we telephoned bright house immediately the next morning and thus started all this nonsense, now bright house telephoned me on wednesday morning at 8.30am as i have not paid apyments on my laptop since it went to the store * as i do not have the laptop in my posession* and was told if they dont repair it etc i won't get it back... i told the man phoning at that time basically that i wasn't impressed and i was going to complain to their head office at the timing of their calls and also that they are less than truthful with people and that i was NEVER told about the excess etc on the policy and so on an so on, he then telephoned at 9am on Thursday ( yesterday) and informed me that the manager of the store would use his discretion and "waive" the excess amount for the laptop so long as i brought ym account up todate ( i owe 2 weeks so no hardship), so i asked why if it was store discretion was the excess added at all because if peole cannot afford their excess they would simply cancel their contracts which they say you can.

He coul not or would not answer me so now i have to decide what to do about laptop, maybe they waived the excess because theyre scared of a lawsuit :)

 

i will keep all updated as and when i can

 

Also for anyone who read my post about the fire that they would not accept my cash for when it was all sorted and they had wiped off what was owed... i have now made them take it back, needless to say they werent happy but they had no choice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

 

There's something you need to understand very clearly... You will NEVER get a product replaced by BrightHouse - regardless of whether you have OSC or DLC policies - due to own damage - be in accidental or otherwise.

 

There is absolutely NO COVER anywhere in your agreements for this.

 

OSC will only cover repairs due to failure

 

DLC will only cover any outstanding payments on your agreement in the event of a successful claim.

 

That is it. There is no more. You will not REPEAT NOT get a replacement laptop.

 

If you bring your account up to date, BrightHouse may (then again, they may decide not to) invoke your DLC policy and end the agreement. You will simply walk away with nothing. Remember, you were only HIRING the laptop until all payments on it were finished.

 

Oh, and it's no good looking at the OSC contract either. Because if BrightHouse decide the laptop is beyond ecconomic repair, they can simply cancel your policy with 7 days notice to you.

 

I will say this until I am blue in the face... THESE POLICIES ARE TOTALLY WORTHLESS!

 

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having given this a little more thought, I think I would try speaking to the FSA about possible unfair contract terms. Just so as you know, BrightHouse are not actually regulated as an insurance provider through the FSA, but CAVERSHAM INSURANCE (MALTA) LTD is... and it is through that associate company that BrightHouse DLC policies are underwritten. Hope this helps.

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...