Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • depends what the fees are, typically nothing can be added once judgement is passed bar litigation costs. on document retention time limits etc at least 6yrs previous must be held though many hold complete info. as for acronyms and abbreviations ideally yes they should     
    • Still have to submit a statement either system....if they fail they can only give verbal because they failed to file and serve.
    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide taking Benefits


jackieandwayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I need to help my friend out. He has just tried to take some cash from his account to find that he has recevied a bank charge leaving him with nothing. His sole income is made up entirely of benefits as he is registered disabled. He has pleaded with the bank to give him his money as he needs it to live on but they just tell him to go away.

 

I saw on here a while ago that this is a no no but I cannot find the thread anywhere with all the letters etc.

 

This is bad as he suffers with night time epilepsy and the money was to pay for personal care overnight as he is suffering at the moment!

 

Could anyone give me a pointer? I'm quite prepared to go down to his branch with him in a minute and let them have hell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jackieandwayne!

 

Have U considered switching to another Bank, or at the very least, opening a 'parachute' current account??...:confused:

 

Then, whilst U are reclaiming against Nationwide, they won't be able to put U under any duress by keep on taking unlawful debits out of your current account, making U short of funds each month!

 

Here are a couple of links for U to have a look at...

Example Step-By-Step Instructions

Do you need a parachute account?

 

Depending on your Credit History etc, some current accounts may be more obtainable/available to U elsewhere.

Try to research the ones that U feel will accept U + are suit your needs most, BEFORE U apply to them.

 

To apply for more than a couple in any 6 month period + be refused, will make your Credit Report look horrendous + make it even more unlikely that any other Bank will accept your application for a NEW current account with them!...:wink:

 

I suggest the above advice cos Banks have been notoriously slow at acknowledging the existence of ANY legislation concerning 'Right of Appropriation'.

Nationwide will continue to'throw a deaf un' until U start threatening to 'get medieval' with them, by pointing the exact laws out to them + insisting that U will take them to Court over the matter.

 

Whilst U will be in the right (...+ they KNOW it, but will STILL insist in playing silly b*gg*rs with U!), the process can take some time to go through. This won't help U out financially in the immediate short time though, when U will probably NEED your every single penny the most!

 

Below are several further Threads, concerning this subject, for U to have a look through...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/36790-bank-taking-your-benefits.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/42170-right-appropriation-stop-bank.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/getting-out-debt/73030-taking-back-control-your.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/92393-theyre-taking-all-my.html

 

 

A start for U to get Nationwide's attention, may be to use a basic letter similar to the one below (...adapted from steven4064's original)...

 

 

Your address

 

Your date

 

 

Nationwide Building Society

Member Service Department

1st Floor, Old Building

King's Park Road

Moulton Park

Northampton

NN3 6NW

 

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992 - Request for repayment

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxx SORT CODE xxxxx

 

I am give brief description of circumstances and in receipt of state which benefits-include child benefit which are paid in to the above account by the department of Social Security (and…). No other income is paid into my account.

 

Section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (‘the Act’) states that these benefits are inalienable, that is, every assignment of or charge on these benefits and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void.

 

During the period start date to end date, charges totalling £xxx have been applied to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth in direct contravention of the Act. In addition, interest totalling £xxx has been applied to my account in relation to these charges. The charges are detailed in the attached schedule.

 

I am writing to ask you to refund to me the charges and interest listed in the schedule which you have levied from my account in contravention of the Act.

 

I will give you 16 days from the date of this letter to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim through the Small Claims Court immediately on the expiry of the second deadline.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Your signature/name

 

 

 

 

...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...